6 research outputs found

    City of Concord Complete Streets Study

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this report is to summarize the data collected as a part of the Concord Complete Streets Study and to provide the City with preliminary support in the progress to construct a safer, more bike and pedestrian friendly Concord. The developments and visions found in this document provide a platform for continued discussion on creating a more pedestrian and bicycle friendly environment that encourages other forms of transportation and provides alternatives to dependency on automobiles

    City of San Luis Obispo, Open Space Survey

    Get PDF
    The City of San Luis Obispo (SLO) has eleven official public open spaces. Managing these places presents a challenge in providing top-tier environmental stewardship, while also accommodating passive recreational use and access, in an era of fiscal limitations and competing priorities. Given that reality and the changing population dynamics in the US, providing equal access to these facilities is of increasing importance, whether by car, bike, on foot or via public transit. These open spaces provide value (environmental, economic and social) primarily to residents, as well as visitors, and gaining a data-driven understanding of that value was a primary goal of this study. Within this framework, team of undergraduate and graduate students from CalPoly, San Luis Obispo worked under the direction of Dr. William Riggs and Natural Resources Manager Robert Hill, to evaluate the conditions, characteristics-of, and visitors-to SLO open spaces. To accomplish this, the project team conducted an initial facilities assessment of the existing conditions at the entrances to SLO’s open spaces. Following this, a survey was conducted to gather information about use, conditions and travel / access to local open spaces. This was complimented by use data gathered from electronic counters placed at open space entrances

    San Luis Obispo Open Space Survey

    Get PDF
    The City of San Luis Obispo (SLO) has eleven official public open spaces. Managing these places presents a challenge in providing top-tier environmental stewardship, while also accommodating passive recreational use and access, in an era of fiscal limitations and competing priorities. Given that reality and the changing population dynamics in the US, providing equal access to these facilities is of increasing importance, whether by car, bike, on foot or via public transit. These open spaces provide value (environmental, economic and social) primarily to residents, as well as visitors, and gaining a data-driven understanding of that value was a primary goal of this study. Within this framework, team of undergraduate and graduate students from CalPoly, San Luis Obispo worked under the direction of Dr. William Riggs and Natural Resources Manager Robert Hill, to evaluate the conditions, characteristics-of, and visitors-to SLO open spaces. To accomplish this, the project team conducted an initial facilities assessment of the existing conditions at the entrances to SLO’s open spaces. Following this, a survey was conducted to gather information about use, conditions and travel / access to local open spaces. This was complimented by use data gathered from electronic counters placed at open space entrances

    Nicotine Products Relative Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    No full text
    Background Nicotine products have been the subject of considerable innovation over the past few decades. While the health risks of combustible cigarettes and most tobacco-based products are well characterized, there is less clarity regarding newer nicotine products, and how they compare with the traditional forms. Methods In this study, we have developed a relative risk hierarchy (RRH) of 13 nicotine products based on systematic review of the scientific literature and analysis of the best available evidence. In total, 3980 publications were identified and screened, with 320 studies being carried through to the final analysis. The health risk data for each product was extracted and the level assessed. The products were analyzed in terms of their toxin emissions and epidemiological data, which were combined on an arbitrary scale from 0 to 100 (low to high risk) to derive a combined risk score for each nicotine product. Results Combustible tobacco products dominate the top of the RRH, with combined risk scores ranging from 40 to 100. The most frequently consumed products generally score highest. Dipping and chewing tobacco place considerably lower on the hierarchy than the combustible products with scores of 10 to 15, but significantly above heat-not-burn devices and snus, which score between 3 and 4. The lowest risk products have scores of less than 0.25 and include electronic cigarettes, non-tobacco pouches and nicotine replacement therapy. Conclusions The RRH provides a framework for the assessment of relative risk across all categories of nicotine products based on the best available evidence regarding their toxin emissions and the observed risk of disease development in product users. As nicotine products continue to evolve, and more data comes to light, the analyses can be updated to represent the best available scientific evidence
    corecore