22 research outputs found

    Images that produced the most distinct eye movements largely depicted social scenes.

    No full text
    <p>Significant differences (blue = men; women = red; dark = p<.05; light = p<.01) displayed for the top fifteen images that produced the most discriminating eye movements and the image that produced the least (bottom right). These images (displayed in full color during the experiment) largely depicted social scenes.</p

    Personality predicts the accuracy of fixation-based sex classification.

    No full text
    <p>Standardized beta values of a logistic regression model trained with personality data to predict sex classification accuracy. Positive beta values represent traits that are likely to be seen in correctly classified individuals while negative betas indicate traits prevalent in misclassified participants. After Bonferroni correction, extraversion (EX), premeditation (PR), perseverance (PE) and conscientiousness (CO) were still significant for both men and women. Openness to experience (OP) was also left significant for women and urgency (UR) for men. Emotional stability (EM), agreeableness (AG) and sensation-seeking (SE) were not significant for either men or women. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the 200 bootstrap estimates.</p

    Words associated with the each extreme of the three dimensions of Osgood's semantic differential.

    No full text
    <p>Participants rated each of the 80 images with respect to these three axis. Before a block (corresponding to one of the three dimensions), they were shown these words as examples of what they might want to be looking for in the images.</p

    Particularly while viewing images depicting people, women looked marginally below salient features.

    No full text
    <p>Violin plots illustrate how the difference in the distribution of Y-component fixations when fixating faces is likely to be behaviorally significant. While the male distributions tend to center on the eyes of the faces, the distribution of female fixations are shifted down to the nose or even the mouth.</p

    Women consistently fixated lower than men while there fixation distributions were more spread out than those of men.

    No full text
    <p>Panel A illustrates how the mean Y component of female fixations were lower than their male counterparts, especially during the potency block. This effect was replicated using a different, more accurate eye tracker and different participants. Panel B shows entropy calculations of the fixation maps show how, as expected, entropy increased with fixation number. Men's fixation distributions contained higher information than women's indicating women were employing more exploratory and diverse visual strategies, especially around the seventh fixation. Error bars are the standard error of the mean.</p

    Sex classification accuracies spanned from 40% to almost 80% while fixations from different image categories produced significantly different levels of performance.

    No full text
    <p>Panel A displays the distribution of accuracies. Panel B shows which image categories produced the most discriminable fixations. Women, in particular produced more predictable fixations when viewing images that typically contained people. Error bars are the standard error of the mean.</p

    WA_countershading_in_ruminants_comparative_data

    No full text
    Column A contains species names. The corresponding phylogenetic tree can be obtained at: (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S12968). Columns B-I are the countershading measures taken from analysis of calibrated images of museum specimens. Columns J-O are ecological and beavioural predictors of countershading variation. Column headings are self-explanatory. Can be saved as a tab-delimited .txt file

    Ant exploration trajectories

    No full text
    36 ant exploration trajectories, each ant tracked for 45 minutes. First column is time, columns 2 and 3 are coordinates x and y. (0,0) is centre of arena (nest entrance). File names indicate treatment 'NC' - no cleaning and 'C' - cleaning, and colony, e.g. 'C1' is colony 1. For example, 'C-C1-1' - cleaning treatment, colony 1, ant 1. Note that the first ants for NC were not used in the study (first ant of sequence enters a clean arena)
    corecore