2 research outputs found

    Condiciones laborales y equipos de protecci贸n personal contra el COVID-19 en personal de salud, Lima-Per煤: Work conditions and personal protective equipment against COVID-19 in health personnel, Lima-Peru

    Get PDF
    Objective: To determine the association between working conditions and access to personal protective equipment (PPE) in health personnel in the city of Lima-Per煤. Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional and analytical study. The sample was of 323 respondents virtually in the city of Lima, who met the selection criteria, captured between 07/09/2020 to 08/09/2020. The data collection instrument was validated by expert judgment with a score> 80% (content validity). An analysis was carried out with the generalized linear model of the poisson family, log link function, robust models with fit. A statistically significant value of p <0.05 was considered. Results: 52% of health personnels (HP) worked more than 12 hours and only 55% received one PPE per work day. 50.9% of the HCP almost never received a mask. In the multivariate analysis, the SP with ages <26 years (p=0.00) and from 26 to 55 years (p=0.00) received an incomplete PPE. HP who did not have an employment relationship with the institution (p=0.006) and those who worked in areas with little contact with COVID-19 patients (p=0.022) received a mask on few occasions. Conclusion: Health personnels under 56 years of age rarely received PPE. When they work without an employment relationship and belonged to areas with little contact with COVID-19 patients, they sometimes received a mask.Objetivo: Determinar la asociaci贸n entre las condiciones laborales y el acceso al equipo de protecci贸n personal (EPP) en profesionales de la salud de la ciudad de Lima-Per煤. M茅todos: Estudio descriptivo, transversal y anal铆tico. La muestra fue de 323 encuestados virtualmente en la ciudad de Lima, que cumplieron los criterios de selecci贸n, captados entre el 09/07/2020 al 09/08/2020. El instrumento de recolecci贸n de datos fue validado por juicio de expertos con un puntaje >80% (validez de contenido). Se realiz贸 un an谩lisis con el modelo lineal generalizado de familia Poisson, funci贸n de enlace log, modelos robustos con ajuste. Se consider贸 un valor estad铆sticamente significativo de p<0,05. Resultados: El 52% de los profesionales de la salud (PS) trabajaron m谩s de 12 horas y solo el 55% recibieron un EPP por d铆a de trabajo. El 50,9% del PS casi nunca recibi贸 una mascarilla. En el an谩lisis multivariado el PS con edades <26 a帽os (p=0,00) y de 26 a 55 a帽os (p=0,00) recibieron un EPP incompleto. Los PS que no ten铆an un v铆nculo laboral con la instituci贸n (p=0,006) y los que trabajaban en 谩reas de poco contacto con pacientes COVID-19 (p=0,022) recibieron una mascarilla en pocas oportunidades. Conclusi贸n: Los profesionales de la salud menores de 56 a帽os recibieron con poca frecuencia un EPP. Cuando trabajan sin un v铆nculo laboral y pertenecen a 谩reas de poco contacto con pacientes COVID-19, reciben algunas veces una mascarilla

    Work conditions and personal protective equipment against COVID-19 in health personnel, Lima-Peru

    Get PDF
    Objetivo: Determinar la asociaci贸n entre las condiciones laborales y el acceso al equipo de protecci贸n personal (EPP) en profesionales de la salud de la ciudad de Lima-Per煤. M茅todos: Estudio descriptivo, transversal y anal铆tico. La muestra fue de 323 encuestados virtualmente en la ciudad de Lima, que cumplieron los criterios de selecci贸n, captados entre el 09/07/2020 al 09/08/2020. El instrumento de recolecci贸n de datos fue validado por juicio de expertos con un puntaje >80% (validez de contenido). Se realiz贸 un an谩lisis con el modelo lineal generalizado de familia Poisson, funci贸n de enlace log, modelos robustos con ajuste. Se consider贸 un valor estad铆sticamente significativo de p 80% (content validity). An analysis was carried out with the generalized linear model of the poisson family, log link function, robust models with fit. A statistically significant value of p <0.05 was considered. Results: 52% of health personnels (HP) worked more than 12 hours and only 55% received one PPE per work day. 50.9% of the HCP almost never received a mask. In the multivariate analysis, the SP with ages <26 years (p=0.00) and from 26 to 55 years (p=0.00) received an incomplete PPE. HP who did not have an employment relationship with the institution (p=0.006) and those who worked in areas with little contact with COVID-19 patients (p=0.022) received a mask on few occasions. Conclusion: Health personnels under 56 years of age rarely received PPE. When they work without an employment relationship and belonged to areas with little contact with COVID-19 patients, they sometimes received a mask
    corecore