47 research outputs found

    RNA-interference in rice against Rice tungro bacilliform virus results in its decreased accumulation in inoculated rice plants

    Get PDF
    Rice tungro is a viral disease seriously affecting rice production in South and Southeast Asia. Tungro is caused by the simultaneous infection in rice of Rice tungro bacilliform virus (RTBV), a double-stranded DNA virus and Rice tungro spherical virus (RTSV), a single-stranded RNA virus. To apply the concept of RNA-interference (RNAi) for the control of RTBV infection, transgenic rice plants expressing DNA encoding ORF IV of RTBV, both in sense as well as in anti-sense orientation, resulting in the formation of double-stranded (ds) RNA, were raised. RNA blot analysis of two representative lines indicated specific degradation of the transgene transcripts and the accumulation of small molecular weight RNA, a hallmark for RNA-interference. In the two transgenic lines expressing ds-RNA, different resistance responses were observed against RTBV. In one of the above lines (RTBV-O-Ds1), there was an initial rapid buildup of RTBV levels following inoculation, comparable to that of untransformed controls, followed by a sharp reduction, resulting in approximately 50-fold lower viral titers, whereas the untransformed controls maintained high levels of the virus till 40 days post-inoculation (dpi). In RTBV-O-Ds2, RTBV DNA levels gradually rose from an initial low to almost 60% levels of the control by 40 dpi. Line RTBV-O-Ds1 showed symptoms of tungro similar to the untransformed control lines, whereas line RTBV-O-Ds2 showed extremely mild symptoms

    Assessing the genetic variation of Ty-1 and Ty-3 alleles conferring resistance to Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus in a broad tomato germplasm

    Get PDF
    The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11032-015-0329-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.[EN] Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) hampers tomato production worldwide. Our previous studies have focussed on mapping and ultimately cloning of the TYLCV resistance genes Ty-1 and Ty-3. Both genes are derived from Solanum chilense and were shown to be allelic. They code for an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDR) belonging to the RDR gamma type defined by a DFDGD catalytic domain. In this study, we first fine-mapped the TYLCV resistance in S. chilense LA1932, LA1960 and LA1971. Results showed that chromosomal intervals of the causal genes in these TYLCV-resistant accessions overlap and cover the region where Ty-1/Ty-3 is located. Further, virus-induced gene silencing was used to silence Ty-1/Ty-3 in tomato lines carrying TYLCV resistance introgressed from S. chilense LA1932, LA1938 and LA1971. Results showed that silencing Ty-1/Ty-3 compromised the resistance in lines derived from S. chilense LA1932 and LA1938. The LA1971-derived material remained resistant upon silencing Ty-1/Ty-3. Further, we studied the allelic variation of the Ty-1/Ty-3 gene by examining cDNA sequences from nine S. chilense-derived lines/accessions and more than 80 tomato cultivars, landraces and accessions of related wild species. The DFDGD catalytic domain of the Ty-1/Ty-3 gene is conserved among all tomato lines and species analysed. In addition, the 12 base pair insertion at the 5-prime part of the Ty-1/Ty-3 gene was found not to be specific for the TYLCV resistance allele. However, compared with the susceptible ty-1 allele, the Ty-1/Ty-3 allele is characterized by three specific amino acids shared by seven TYLCV-resistant S. chilense accessions or derived lines. Thus, Ty-1/Ty-3-specific markers can be developed based on these polymorphisms. Elevated transcript levels were observed for all tested S. chilense RDR alleles (both Ty-1 and ty-1 alleles), demonstrating that elevated expression level is not a good selection criterion for a functional Ty-1/Ty-3 allele.The infectious TYLCV clone was kindly provided by Professor Eduardo Rodriguez Bejarano (Universidad de Malaga). We thank Dick Lohuis for his help with agro-infiltrations, Marc Hendriks and Marjon Arens for RNA isolation and sequencing. This project was financed by the Centre for BioSystems Genomics (CBSG), which is part of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (http://www.cbsg.nl). Olga Julian was granted a scholarship by Generalitat Valenciana. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.Caro, M.; Verlaan, MG.; JuliĂĄn RodrĂ­guez, O.; Finkers, R.; Wolters, AA.; Hutton, S.; Scott, JW.... (2015). Assessing the genetic variation of Ty-1 and Ty-3 alleles conferring resistance to Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus in a broad tomato germplasm. Molecular Breeding. 35. doi:10.1007/s11032-015-0329-yS13235Agrama H, Scott J (2006) Quantitative trait loci for tomato yellow leaf curl virus and tomato mottle virus resistance in tomato. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131:267–272Anbinder I, Reuveni M, Azari R, Paran I, Nahon S, Shlomo H, Chen L, Lapidot M, Levin I (2009) Molecular dissection of tomato leaf curl virus resistance in tomato line TY172 derived from Solanum peruvianum. Theor Appl Genet 119:519–530Bai Y, Van der Hulst R, Huang C, Wei L, Stam P, Lindhout P (2004) Mapping Ol-4, a gene conferring resistance to Oidium neolycopersici and originating from Lycopersicon peruvianum LA2172, requires multi-allelic, single-locus markers. Theor Appl Genet 109:1215–1223Butterbach P, Verlaan MG, Dullemans A, Lohuis D, Visser RGF, Bai Y, Kormelink R (2014) The TYLCV Resistance Gene Ty-1 confers resistance in tomato through enhanced transcriptional gene silencing. PNAS 111:12942–12947Cohen S, Lapidot M (2007) Appearance and expansion of TYLCV: a historical point of view. In: Czosnek H (ed) Tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 3–12Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, McVean G, Durbin R, Group GPA (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27:2156–2158Fauquet CM, Briddon RW, Brown JK, Moriones E, Stanley J, Zerbini M, Zhou X (2008) Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature. Arch Virol 153:783–821Friedmann M, Lapidot M, Cohen S, Pilowsky M (1998) A novel source of resistance to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus exhibiting a symptomless reaction to viral infection. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:1004–1007Hanson PM, Green SK, Kuo G (2006) Ty-2, a gene on chromosome 11 conditioning geminivirus resistance in tomato. Tomato Genet Coop Rep 56:17–18Hutton SF, Scott JW (2013) Fine-mapping and cloning of Ty-1 and Ty-3; and mapping of a new TYLCV resistance locus, “Ty-6”. In: Tomato breeders round table proceedings 2013, Chiang Mai, ThailandHutton SF, Scott JW, Schuster DJ (2012) Recessive resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus from the tomato cultivar tyking is located in the same region as Ty-5 on chromosome 4. HortScience 47:324–327Ji Y, Schuster DJ, Scott JW (2007) Ty-3, a begomovirus resistance locus near the Tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance locus Ty-1 on chromosome 6 of tomato. Mol Breeding 20:271–284Ji Y, Scott JW, Schuster DJ, Maxwell DP (2009) Molecular mapping of Ty-4, a new tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance locus on chromosome 3 of tomato. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 134:281–288Levin I, Karniel U, Fogel D, Reuveni M, Gelbart D, Evenor D, Chen L, Nahon S, Shlomo H, Machbosh Z, Lapidot M (2013) Cloning and analysis of the tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance gene Ty-5. In: Tomato breeders round table proceedings 2013, Chiang Mai, ThailandLi H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079MejĂ­a L, Teni RE, Vidavski F, Czosnek H, Lapidot M, Nakhla MK, Maxwell DP (2005) Evaluation of tomato germplasm and selection of breeding lines for resistance to begomoviruses in Guatemala. In: Momol MT, Ji P, Jones JB (eds) Proceedings 1st international symposium on tomato diseases. Acta Horticult 695:251–256Menda N, Strickler SR, Edwards JD, Bombarely A, Dunham DM, Martin GB, Mejia L, Hutton SF, Havey MJ, Maxwell DP, Mueller LA (2014) Analysis of wild-species introgressions in tomato inbreds uncovers ancestral origins. BMC Plant Biol 14(1):287PĂ©rez de Castro A, DĂ­ez MJ, Nuez F (2007) Inheritance of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance derived from Solanum pimpinellifolium UPV16991. Plant Dis 91:879–885PĂ©rez de Castro A, JuliĂĄn O, DĂ­ez M (2013) Genetic control and mapping of Solanum chilense LA1932, LA1960 and LA1971-derived resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl disease. Euphytica 190:203–214Pico B, Ferriol M, Diez MJ, Nuez F (1999) Developing tomato breeding lines resistant to tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Plant Breeding 118:537–542Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP (2011) Integrative genomics viewer. Nature. Biotech 29:24–26Sahu PP, Puranik S, Khan M, Prasad M (2012) Recent advances in tomato functional genomics: utilization of VIGS. Protoplasma 249(4):1017–1027Scott JW, Stevens MR, Barten JHM, Thome CR, Polston JE, Schuster DJ, Serra CA (1996) Introgression of resistance to whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses from Lycopersicon chilense to tomato. In: Gerling D, Mayer RT (eds) Bemisia 1995; taxonomy, biology, damage control, and management. Intercept Press, Andover, pp 357–367Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739The 100 Tomato Genome Sequencing Consortium (2014) Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) clade by whole-genome sequencing. Plant J 80:136–148The Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635–641Vanitharani R, Chellappan P, Pita JS, Fauquet CM (2004) Differential roles of AC2 and AC4 of cassava geminiviruses in mediating synergism and suppression of posttranscriptional gene silencing. J Virol 78:9487–9498Verlaan MG, Szinay D, Hutton SF, de Jong H, Kormelink R, Visser RGF, Scott JW, Bai Y (2011) Chromosomal rearrangements between tomato and Solanum chilense hamper mapping and breeding of the TYLCV resistance gene Ty-1. Plant J 68:1093–1103Verlaan MG, Hutton SF, Ibrahem RM, Kormelink R, Visser RGF, Scott JW, Edwards JD, Bai Y (2013) The tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance genes Ty-1 and Ty-3 are allelic and code for DFDGD-class RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. PLoS Genet 9(3):e1003399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003399Vidavski F (2007) Exploitation of resistance genes found in wild tomato species to produce resistant cultivars; Pile up of Resistant Genes. In: Czosnek H (ed) Tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease. Springer, Netherlands, pp 363–372Willmann MR, Endres MW, Cook RT, Gregory BD (2011) The functions of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases in arabidopsis. In: The Arabidopsis Book, e0146Yang X, Caro M, Hutton SF, Scott JW, Guo Y, Wang X, Rashid MH, Szinay D, de Jong H, Visser RGF, Bai Y, Du Y (2014) Fine mapping of the tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance gene Ty-2 on chromosome 11 of tomato. Mol Breeding 34:749–760Zamir D, Ekstein Michelson I, Zakay Y, Navot N, Zeidan M, Sarfatti M, Eshed Y, Harel E, Pleban T, van Oss H (1994) Mapping and introgression of a tomato yellow leaf curl virus tolerance gene, Ty-1. Theor Appl Genet 88:141–14

    MicroRNA-binding viral protein interferes with Arabidopsis development

    No full text
    MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small (≈21 nt), noncoding RNAs that negatively regulate target mRNAs at the posttranscriptional level that are involved in development. In plants, virus-induced disease symptoms often result in developmental abnormalities resembling perturbation of miRNA-mediated function. Here, we report that expression in transgenic plants of a geminivirus-encoded AC4 protein from African cassava mosaic virus Cameroon Strain (ACMV), a suppressor of posttranscriptional gene silencing, was correlated with decreased accumulation of host miRNAs and increased development abnormalities in Arabidopsis. Down-regulation of miRNA correlated with an up-regulation of target mRNA level. In vitro binding assays revealed the ability of AC4 of ACMV (A-AC4) but not East African cassava mosaic Cameroon virus AC2 to bind single-stranded forms of miRNAs and short interfering RNAs but not double-stranded RNA forms. Normally, a labile intermediate during the miRNA biogenesis/RNA-induced silencing complex assembly, miRNA(*), was below the level of detection, indicating that AC4 might interfere at a point downstream of the miRNA duplex unwinding process. The association of AC4 with miRNA was demonstrated by the association of A-AC4–GFP fusion protein, extracted from Arabidopsis protoplasts, with 2â€Č-O-methyloligonucleotide complementary to miR159 (miR159(*)) and by the presence of miRNA with the A-AC4–GFP fusion protein after immunoprecipitation with antibody against GFP. In both assays, A-AC4 protein and miRNA complexes were copurified. These results provide direct evidence that AC4 is a unique virus-encoded posttranscriptional gene-silencing suppressor protein that binds to and presumably inactivates mature miRNAs and thus blocks the normal miRNA-mediated regulation of target mRNAs, resulting in developmental defects in Arabidopsis

    Factors contributing to deletion within Mungbean yellow mosaic virus partial dimers in binary vectors used for agroinoculation

    No full text
    Mungbean yellow mosaic virus-Vigna (MYMV) sequences cloned as partial dimers within the T-DNA of a binary vector were deleted at a high frequency upon conjugal mobilization from Escherichia coli into Agrobacterium tumefaciens. This deletion involving the genome-length viral DNA did not occur when the binary plasmid was inside E. coli and when the binary plasmid was introduced into Agrobacterium by electroporation. Deletions occurred in both DNA A and DNA B partial dimers. A minimum of 500-nt continuity on either side of the nonanucleotide in the duplicated common region is required for deletion. A. tumefaciens cells in which deletion was complete, grew as larger colonies reflecting a growth advantage. The small, slow-growing colonies eventually lost the genome-length viral sequences after a few more cycles of growth. Partial dimers in binary plasmids pGA472 and pBin19 with RK2 replicon underwent deletion while those in pPZP with pVS1 replicon did not undergo deletion. Deletion was observed in A. tumefaciens strains C58, A136, A348 and A281 with C58 chromosome background, but not in Ach5 and T37. Interestingly, deletion did not occur in A. tumefaciens strain AGL1 with a recA mutation in C58 chromosome, implying a clear role for recombination in deletion. These observations suggest the choice of Agrobacterium strains and binary vectors for agroinoculation of geminiviruses

    Mungbean yellow mosaic virus-Vi agroinfection by codelivery of DNA A and DNA B from one Agrobacterium strain

    No full text
    Agroinfection of bipartite geminiviruses is routinely done by mixing two Agrobacterium strains that independently harbor partial tandem repeats of DNA A and DNA B. We report here an improved agroinfection method for bipartite geminiviruses that utilizes one strain of Agrobacterium that harbors DNA A and DNA B partial tandem repeats on two compatible replicons. A cointegrate vector, pGV2260::pGV1.3A, with the partial tandem repeat of Mungbean yellow mosaic virus-Vi (MYMV-Vi) DNA A and a binary vector, pGA1.9B, with the partial tandem repeat of MYMV-Vi DNA B gave an agroinfection efficiency of 24% when harbored in two Agrobacterium strains and an efficiency of 61% when harbored in one Agrobacterium strain. A combination of binary vectors, pGA1.9A with MYMV-Vi DNA A partial tandem repeat and pGA1.9B with DNA B partial tandem repeat, gave an agroinfection efficiency of 74% when harbored in two strains. But pGA1.9A and pPZP1.9B (a partial tandem repeat of DNA B), when present in the same Agrobacterium strain, gave 100% agroinfection. Accumulation of viral DNA was shown by Southern blotting. The single-strain method using two compatible replicons consistently gave 100% agroinfection efficiency

    Fighting geminiviruses by RNAi and vice versa

    No full text
    Geminiviruses have recently emerged not only as the cause of devastating diseases of important crop plants but also as a tool to study fundamental aspects of RNA interference (RNAi) and virus-induced gene silencing. RNA silencing is an evolutionary conserved mechanism protecting cell from pathogenic RNA and DNA, which is increasingly viewed as an adaptive immune system of plants against viruses. Here we summarize recent developments in the field of geminivirology presented by several leading groups at the Meeting "Gemini2004" (a total of 85 participants from all over the world) with the main focus on the anti-viral strategies that exploit RNAi and related silencing phenomena

    Analysis of an isolate of Mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV) with a highly variable DNA B component

    No full text
    One DNA A (KA30) and five different DNA B components (KA21, KA22, KA27, KA28 and KA34) of a geminivirus, Mungbean yellow mosaic virus-Vigna (MYMV-Vig) were cloned from a pooled sample of field-infected Vigna mungo plants from Vamban, South India. MYMV-Vig DNA A (KA30) and one of the DNA B components (KA27) exhibited 97% and 95% sequence identities, respectively, to those of MYMV reported from Thailand. However, the DNA B components KA21, KA22, KA28 and KA34 exhibited only 71 to 72% sequence identity to MYMV DNA B. Co-existence of multiple DNA B components in field-infected V. mungo was proved by Southern and PCR analyses. Each of the five DNA B components was infective together with the DNA A upon agroinoculation. Agroinoculation with mixed cultures of Agrobacterium with partial dimers of DNA A and all five DNA Bs proved that all five DNA B components can co-infect a single V. mungo plant
    corecore