Scientometric Analysis and Literature Research Growth of Lupus During 2010-2017

Abstract: The paper analyses the growth pattern of Lupus disease literature during 2010-2017. The data downloaded from web of science database, further interpreted and analyzed for the study purpose. Total number of publications has been identified as 38750 records. The distribution of publications based on the year of production, country wise productivity, document type of the publications, Major subject categories, Authors whose contribution is in the maximum level were studied. The study reveals a progressive increase on LUPUS research during 2010-2017. The year 2016 contributed highest number of publications. United States is the top contributor during 2010-2017. PETRI M is the leading author having 394 articles which is 1.017% of the total publications

Bibliometric Analysis of Research Productivity of Health Care Professionals in Saudi Arabia: An Exploratory Study

Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyze research productivity through literature mapping of Health care Professionals (HCPs) belonging to Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal university (IAU), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). To facilitate that, publications made by the HCPs in those journals indexed in the PubMed indexed medical database have been chosen for this study. The selected study period was between 2014 and 2018. This study also explores the literature growth, mapping of the health care literature and health care professional’s collaboration patterns in KSA. Methods: The chosen data were downloaded from PubMed Database through Endnote software. Publications are filtered to countries based on the affiliation. The following search terms have been used to yield the records from database on 10th April 2019, “(((((saudi[Affiliation] OR saudiarabia[Affiliation]) OR KSA[Affiliation]) OR K.S.A[Affiliation]) OR K.S.A.[Affiliation]) OR kingdom of saudi arabia[Affiliation]) AND ( 2014/01/01 [PDAT] : 2018/12/31 [PDAT])))))“. Result: It revealed that 33872 papers have been published with specific on health care literature during the study period. Among the published papers, 26.52% (N=8983) of them belonging to the year 2018 whereas 75% of the articles were published in a rest of the years. The journal “PLoS One” was the most productive Journal, with 680 of publication were produced during 2014-18, followed by Saudi Med J (N=619), Sci Rep (N=612), Saudi J Biol Sci (N=412). In terms of collaboration, 59.05% (N=20001) of the articles were published with more than five authors, demonstrating a high range of collaboration among the Saudi Arabian health professionals. Conclusion: This study concludes that there is a progressive growth in the number of publications as well as research collaborations among Saudi healthcare professionals

Bibliometric Analysis of Research Productivity of Health Care Professionals in Saudi Arabia: An Exploratory Study

Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyze research productivity through literature mapping of Health care Professionals (HCPs) belonging to Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal university (IAU), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). To facilitate that, publications made by the HCPs in those journals indexed in the PubMed indexed medical database have been chosen for this study. The selected study period was between 2014 and 2018. This study also explores the literature growth, mapping of the health care literature and health care professional’s collaboration patterns in KSA. Methods: The chosen data were downloaded from PubMed Database through Endnote software. Publications are filtered to countries based on the affiliation. The following search terms have been used to yield the records from database on 10th April 2019, “(((((saudi[Affiliation] OR saudiarabia[Affiliation]) OR KSA[Affiliation]) OR K.S.A[Affiliation]) OR K.S.A.[Affiliation]) OR kingdom of saudi arabia[Affiliation]) AND ( 2014/01/01 [PDAT] : 2018/12/31 [PDAT])))))“. Result: It revealed that 33872 papers have been published with specific on health care literature during the study period. Among the published papers, 26.52% (N=8983) of them belonging to the year 2018 whereas 75% of the articles were published in a rest of the years. The journal “PLoS One” was the most productive Journal, with 680 of publication were produced during 2014-18, followed by Saudi Med J (N=619), Sci Rep (N=612), Saudi J Biol Sci (N=412). In terms of collaboration, 59.05% (N=20001) of the articles were published with more than five authors, demonstrating a high range of collaboration among the Saudi Arabian health professionals. Conclusion: This study concludes that there is a progressive growth in the number of publications as well as research collaborations among Saudi healthcare professionals

Allelopathy Research in Global Perspective: A Scientometric Study of Academic Productivity over a Period of 25 Years (1995 - 2019)

This research is concerned with the Allelopathy research literature published from 1995 to 2019 obtained from SCOPUS and studied to identify the trends in research publication in terms of various document types, annual growth, the share of publication, citation growth, average citation per paper, most productive country, authors, journals, highly cited articles during this period. These factors were identified and compared for their research impact over a period of 25 years

Bibliometric Analysis of Research Productivity of Health Care Professionals in Saudi Arabia: An Exploratory Study

Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyze research productivity through literature mapping of Health care Professionals (HCPs) belonging to Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal university (IAU), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). To facilitate that, publications made by the HCPs in those journals indexed in the PubMed indexed medical database have been chosen for this study. The selected study period was between 2014 and 2018. This study also explores the literature growth, mapping of the health care literature and health care professional’s collaboration patterns in KSA. Methods: The chosen data were downloaded from PubMed Database through Endnote software. Publications are filtered to countries based on the affiliation. The following search terms have been used to yield the records from database on 10th April 2019, “(((((saudi[Affiliation] OR saudiarabia[Affiliation]) OR KSA[Affiliation]) OR K.S.A[Affiliation]) OR K.S.A.[Affiliation]) OR kingdom of saudi arabia[Affiliation]) AND ( 2014/01/01 [PDAT] : 2018/12/31 [PDAT])))))“. Result: It revealed that 33872 papers have been published with specific on health care literature during the study period. Among the published papers, 26.52% (N=8983) of them belonging to the year 2018 whereas 75% of the articles were published in a rest of the years. The journal “PLoS One” was the most productive Journal, with 680 of publication were produced during 2014-18, followed by Saudi Med J (N=619), Sci Rep (N=612), Saudi J Biol Sci (N=412). In terms of collaboration, 59.05% (N=20001) of the articles were published with more than five authors, demonstrating a high range of collaboration among the Saudi Arabian health professionals. Conclusion: This study concludes that there is a progressive growth in the number of publications as well as research collaborations among Saudi healthcare professionals

A Vacant Approach for Ranking of Open Access Journals of India’s: A Scientific Evaluation

The aim of this research is to show the presence and effect of vacant approaches to open access journals of India’s scientific journal with a view published in 2018. The excellence of the scientific journal mainly formed bibliometric indicators; Journal Impact Factor (JIF), Eigen Factor Score (ES), SCImago Journal Rank Indicator (SJR), Cite Score rank and Google Index rank. A special vacant approach of open access journals of India was chosen from their community. JIFs and ESs were collected from the Journal citation report and the SJR and Cite Score from the Scopus database, Google index from google scholar Metrix. All journals were listed in distinguished databases of Web of Science (WOS), Scopus and Google Scholar. The 21 open Access Journals were reviewed and studied the approaches calculated with all necessary formed data reclaimed from the basic and source sites in employing JIF, SJR, ES, CS and GS ranking quality. Interdependence indices were depicted using Pearson’s and Spearman’s statistical interconnection along with the application of SPSS 23.0 software. Tested JIFs varied within 3.03 and 0.551 changed medially in ES 0.00642 and 0.00049 as JSR classed within 0.816 and 0.236, CS value changed within 2.04 and 0.45 and GS value fall within 37 to 12. Multinomial interdependence within the chosen indices (JIF, ES, SJR, CS, and GS class) for classifying the chosen vacant approaches shows that there is a lofty Pearson’s (r). The analytical interdependence within JIF and SJR indices (rz 0.608) and CS preferably fewer indexes interdependence with JIF and CS class indices for periodicals in the chosen class (rz 029).This interconnection is without deescalate within JIF and ES value (rz0.246). As regard to Spearman’s rho statistical interdependence, a towering interdependence remained within JIF and SJR (coefficient values of 0.649), and a preferably small link within JIF and Es collaborating values of (0.368) indices for vacant approaches for Journals in India

A Vacant Approach for Ranking of Open Access Journals of India’s: A Scientific Evaluation

The aim of this research is to show the presence and effect of vacant approaches to open access journals of India’s scientific journal with a view published in 2018. The excellence of the scientific journal mainly formed bibliometric indicators; Journal Impact Factor (JIF), Eigen Factor Score (ES), SCImago Journal Rank Indicator (SJR), Cite Score rank and Google Index rank. A special vacant approach of open access journals of India was chosen from their community. JIFs and ESs were collected from the Journal citation report and the SJR and Cite Score from the Scopus database, Google index from google scholar Metrix. All journals were listed in distinguished databases of Web of Science (WOS), Scopus and Google Scholar. The 21 open Access Journals were reviewed and studied the approaches calculated with all necessary formed data reclaimed from the basic and source sites in employing JIF, SJR, ES, CS and GS ranking quality. Interdependence indices were depicted using Pearson’s and Spearman’s statistical interconnection along with the application of SPSS 23.0 software. Tested JIFs varied within 3.03 and 0.551 changed medially in ES 0.00642 and 0.00049 as JSR classed within 0.816 and 0.236, CS value changed within 2.04 and 0.45 and GS value fall within 37 to 12. Multinomial interdependence within the chosen indices (JIF, ES, SJR, CS, and GS class) for classifying the chosen vacant approaches shows that there is a lofty Pearson’s (r). The analytical interdependence within JIF and SJR indices (rz 0.608) and CS preferably fewer indexes interdependence with JIF and CS class indices for periodicals in the chosen class (rz 029).This interconnection is without deescalate within JIF and ES value (rz0.246). As regard to Spearman’s rho statistical interdependence, a towering interdependence remained within JIF and SJR (coefficient values of 0.649), and a preferably small link within JIF and Es collaborating values of (0.368) indices for vacant approaches for Journals in India