Tumor de pancoast presentación de un caso

Introducción: El Tumor de Pancoast se produce por crecimiento local de un tumor del vértice pulmonar que penetra fácilmente en el canal neural y destruye las raíces nerviosas octava cervical y primera y segunda torácicas. Su causa más frecuente es el cáncer de pulmón.Objetivo: Al presentar este caso, nuestro objetivo es mostrar de forma ilustrativa una de las formas neurológicas de presentación del cáncer de pulmóny señalar una vez más cómo este tipo de paciente casi siempre acude por Ortopedia y rara vez por Neumología o Medicina Interna.Presentación del caso: Se presentó una paciente que aquejó primeramente dolor en  hombro derecho, acude al ortopédico y al reumatólogo, este último  al verle las manos (uñas en vidrio de reloj y dedos hipocráticos), la remite a Neumología, se realiza radiografía de tórax, se ingresa en Medicina Interna, donde se le practica una  serie de estudios, incluida cirugía de mínimo acceso por el Grupo de TóraxConclusiones: El estudio histológico corroboró  el diagnóstico de carcinoma bronquial epidermoide, así como demostró cómo estos casos entran por Ortopedia, lo cual atrasa el  accionar médico.Motivación: Tuvimos a bien presentar este caso, que ilustra cómo los pacientes con esta patología, en muchas ocasiones, entran por Ortopedia, lo cual demora el diagnóstico y, por ende, la conducta.Palabras clave: tumor de pancoast, uñas en vidrio de reloj, dedos hipocráticos. carcinoma bronquial epidermoide.</p

Tumor de pancoast presentación de un caso Pancoast´s tumor case presentation

Introducción: El Tumor de Pancoast se produce por crecimiento local de un tumor del vértice pulmonar que penetra fácilmente en el canal neural y destruye las raíces nerviosas octava cervical y primera y segunda torácicas. Su causa más frecuente es el cáncer de pulmón. Objetivo: Al presentar este caso, nuestro objetivo es mostrar de forma ilustrativa una de las formas neurológicas de presentación del cáncer de pulmón y señalar una vez más cómo este tipo de paciente casi siempre acude por Ortopedia y rara vez por Neumología o Medicina Interna. Presentación del caso: Se presentó una paciente que aquejó primeramente dolor en hombro derecho, acude al ortopédico y al reumatólogo, este último al verle las manos (uñas en vidrio de reloj y dedos hipocráticos), la remite a Neumología, se realiza radiografía de tórax, se ingresa en Medicina Interna, donde se le practica una serie de estudios, incluida cirugía de mínimo acceso por el Grupo de Tórax. Conclusiones: El estudio histológico corroboró el diagnóstico de carcinoma bronquial epidermoide, así como demostró cómo estos casos entran por Ortopedia, lo cual atrasa el accionar médico. Motivación: Tuvimos a bien presentar este caso, que ilustra cómo los pacientes con esta patología, en muchas ocasiones, entran por Ortopedia, lo cual demora el diagnóstico y, por ende, la conducta.<br>Introduction: Pancoast tumor refers to a tumor located in the vertex of the lung. It can easily penetrate the neural channel destroying the eight cervical and first and second thoracic nervous roots. The most frequent cause of this tumor is lung cancer. Objective: To present this case, we wants to show a neurological presentation form of lung cancer and demostrate again that this type of patient often not consult in Neumology or Internal Medicine inicially. Case presentation: Female patient complaining of pain in the right shoulder was seen in the orthopedic and rheumatology office. On Physical exam the rheumatologists detects watch glass nails and Hippocratic fingers and refers the patient to the pneumatological department. A decrease in the breath sounds of the right vertex was detected. An x-ray of the thorax was taken and the patient was admitted in the internal medicine ward. Studies carried out included minimal access thoracic surgery. Conclusions: Histologically the diagnosis was an epidermoid bronchial carcinoma, also demostrate that this type of patient often not consult in Neumology or Internal Medicine inicially. Motivation: This case shows how often patients with this pathology consult by orthopedic, retarding diagnosis and the treatment

Endoscopics findings in patients with hemoptysis and normal chest X-ray

Hemoptysis is defined as the outcomming of blood from the subglotic region, habitually by the mechanism of cough. A cross- sectional, retrospective, transverse and descriptive study was carried out in patients with hemoptysis and normal PA thorax's x-ray. To whom were practiced bronchoscopy in the "Benéfico Jurídico" Neumologyc Hospital from January 1999, to January 2009, with the purpose of identifing the endoscopyc discoveries obtained through this procedure. The information was obtained from the bronchoscopy, microbiology and pathological Anatomy records of this center. The population was composed by 197 sick people and the sample was constituted by 67 patients. The statistical analysis was carried out in the program EPIDAT version 3.0. Mediates and standard (SD) were used for quantitative variables and absolute frequency and the percentages with their respective intervals of trust of 95% were used in all the variables. The masculine sex prevailed with a total of 45 patients (67.2%) and the age group was among 40-49 years old. In 70.1% of the cases it was observed inflammatory signs, and it was also obtained growth of pathogenics germs in 16 patients and in 17 (25.3%) it was confirmed the diagnosis of neoplasic desease by biopsy and/or bronchial brushing

In-hospital care, complications, and 4-month mortality following a hip or proximal femur fracture: the Spanish registry of osteoporotic femur fractures prospective cohort study

We have characterised 997 hip fracture patients from a representative 45 Spanish hospitals, and followed them up prospectively for up to 4 months. Despite suboptimal surgical delays (average 59.1 hours), in-hospital mortality was lower than in Northern European cohorts. The secondary fracture prevention gap is unacceptably high at 85%. PURPOSE: To characterise inpatient care, complications, and 4-month mortality following a hip or proximal femur fracture in Spain. METHODS: Design: prospective cohort study. Consecutive sample of patients ≥ 50 years old admitted in a representative 45 hospitals for a hip or proximal femur fragility fracture, from June 2014 to June 2016 and followed up for 4 months post-fracture. Patient characteristics, site of fracture, in-patient care (including secondary fracture prevention) and complications, and 4-month mortality are described. RESULTS: A total of 997 subjects (765 women) of mean (standard deviation) age 83.6 (8.4) years were included. Previous history of fracture/s (36.9%) and falls (43%) were common, and 10-year FRAX-estimated major and hip fracture risks were 15.2% (9.0%) and 8.5% (7.6%) respectively. Inter-trochanteric (44.6%) and displaced intra-capsular (28.0%) were the most common fracture sites, and fixation with short intramedullary nail (38.6%) with spinal anaesthesia (75.5%) the most common procedures. Surgery and rehabilitation were initiated within a mean 59.1 (56.7) and 61.9 (55.1) hours respectively, and average length of stay was 11.5 (9.3) days. Antithrombotic and antibiotic prophylaxis were given to 99.8% and 98.2% respectively, whilst only 12.4% received secondary fracture prevention at discharge. Common complications included delirium (36.1 %) and kidney failure (14.1%), with in-hospital and 4-month mortality of 2.1% and 11% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite suboptimal surgical delay, post-hip fracture mortality is low in Spanish hospitals. The secondary fracture prevention gap is unacceptably high at > 85%, in spite of virtually universal anti-thrombotic and antibiotic prophylaxis

In-hospital care, complications, and 4-month mortality following a hip or proximal femur fracture : the Spanish registry of osteoporotic femur fractures prospective cohort study

Altres ajuts: DPA is funded by a National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist award (CS-2013-13-012). This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. This work was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford. Funded in part by CIBER on Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES), Instituto Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, FEDER funds. Unrestricted research grant from Amgen S.A. Amgen did not have any role in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing the report, and the decision to submit the report for publication.We have characterised 997 hip fracture patients from a representative 45 Spanish hospitals, and followed them up prospectively for up to 4 months. Despite suboptimal surgical delays (average 59.1 hours), in-hospital mortality was lower than in Northern European cohorts. The secondary fracture prevention gap is unacceptably high at 85%. To characterise inpatient care, complications, and 4-month mortality following a hip or proximal femur fracture in Spain. Design: prospective cohort study. Consecutive sample of patients ≥ 50 years old admitted in a representative 45 hospitals for a hip or proximal femur fragility fracture, from June 2014 to June 2016 and followed up for 4 months post-fracture. Patient characteristics, site of fracture, in-patient care (including secondary fracture prevention) and complications, and 4-month mortality are described. A total of 997 subjects (765 women) of mean (standard deviation) age 83.6 (8.4) years were included. Previous history of fracture/s (36.9%) and falls (43%) were common, and 10-year FRAX-estimated major and hip fracture risks were 15.2% (9.0%) and 8.5% (7.6%) respectively. Inter-trochanteric (44.6%) and displaced intra-capsular (28.0%) were the most common fracture sites, and fixation with short intramedullary nail (38.6%) with spinal anaesthesia (75.5%) the most common procedures. Surgery and rehabilitation were initiated within a mean 59.1 (56.7) and 61.9 (55.1) hours respectively, and average length of stay was 11.5 (9.3) days. Antithrombotic and antibiotic prophylaxis were given to 99.8% and 98.2% respectively, whilst only 12.4% received secondary fracture prevention at discharge. Common complications included delirium (36.1 %) and kidney failure (14.1%), with in-hospital and 4-month mortality of 2.1% and 11% respectively. Despite suboptimal surgical delay, post-hip fracture mortality is low in Spanish hospitals. The secondary fracture prevention gap is unacceptably high at > 85%, in spite of virtually universal anti-thrombotic and antibiotic prophylaxis. The online version of this article (10.1007/s11657-018-0515-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users