What Regulates Galaxy Evolution? Open Questions in Our Understanding of Galaxy Formation and Evolution

In April 2013, a workshop entitled "What Regulates Galaxy Evolution" was held at the Lorentz Center. The aim of the workshop was to bring together the observational and theoretical community working on galaxy evolution, and to discuss in depth of the current problems in the subject, as well as to review the most recent observational constraints. A total of 42 astrophysicists attended the workshop. A significant fraction of the time was devoted to identifying the most interesting "open questions" in the field, and to discuss how progress can be made. This review discusses the four questions (one for each day of the workshop) that, in our opinion, were the focus of the most intense debate. We present each question in its context, and close with a discussion of what future directions should be pursued in order to make progress on these problems.Comment: 36 pages, 6 Figures, submitted to New Astronomy Review

The Mass Growth and Stellar Ages of Galaxies: Observations versus Simulations

Using observed stellar mass functions out to $z=5$, we measure the main progenitor stellar mass growth of descendant galaxies with masses of $\log{M_{*}/M_{\odot}}=11.5,11.0,10.5,10.0$ at $z\sim0.1$ using an evolving cumulative number density selection. From these mass growth histories, we are able to measure the time at which half the total stellar mass of the descendant galaxy was assembled, $t_{a}$, which, in order of decreasing mass corresponds to redshifts of $z_{a}=1.28, 0.92, 0.60$ and $0.51$. We compare this to the median light-weighted stellar age $t_{*}$ ($z_{*} = 2.08, 1.49, 0.82$ and $0.37$) of a sample of low redshift SDSS galaxies (from the literature) and find the timescales are consistent with more massive galaxies forming a higher fraction of their stars ex-situ compared to lower mass descendants. We find that both $t_{*}$ and $t_{a}$ strongly correlate with mass which is in contrast to what is found in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation which shows a flat relationship between $t_{a}$ and $M_{*}$. However, the semi-analytic model of \citet{henriques2015} is consistent with the observations in both $t_{a}$ and $t_{*}$ with $M_{*}$, showing the most recent semi-analytic models are better able to decouple the evolution of the baryons from the dark matter in lower-mass galaxies.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ

Magnification as a Probe of Dark Matter Halos at high redshift

We propose a new approach for measuring the mass profile and shape of groups and clusters of galaxies, which uses lensing magnification of distant background galaxies. The main advantage of lensing magnification is that, unlike lensing shear, it relies on accurate photometric redshifts only and not galaxy shapes, thus enabling the study of the dark matter distribution with unresolved source galaxies. We present a feasibility study, using a real population of z > 2.5 Lyman Break Galaxies as source galaxies, and where, similar to galaxy-galaxy lensing, foreground lenses are stacked in order to increase the signal-to-noise. We find that there is an interesting new observational window for gravitational lensing as a probe of dark matter halos at high redshift, which does not require measurement of galaxy shapes