10 research outputs found
Coagulation : screening tests and diagnostic protocols [Coagulazione: test di screening e percorsi diagnostici]
Valutazione dell’efficacia dell’erogazione water mist nel controllo, nella soppressione e nell’estinzione degli incendi: implementazione di modelli di simulazione numerica e confronto con risultati sperimentali
Accuracy of a portable prothrombin time monitor (Coagucheck) in patients on chronic anticoagulant therapy: a prospective multicenter study
A portable prothrombin time (PT) monitor allows patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) to measure their PT at home. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a portable PT monitor (Coagucheck, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) as compared with laboratory methods. The prospective study was conducted in four centers of the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics. A one-month instruction phase was followed by a six-month surveillance phase. Seventy-eight subjects on stable OAT (48 men, 30 women, age range: 18-75) were selected on a volunteer basis. Dual measurements of INR values were performed in each subject both from finger capillary blood by the monitor and from venous blood by the Anticoagulation Clinic laboratory in three instruction sessions. The mean difference (bias) of the monitor INR results when compared with the average of laboratory INR and monitor INR results was -0.025 (limits of agreement-LA: -0.84/+0.81 INR units). The mean bias was -0.0675 (LA: -0.37/+0.23), +0.018 (LA: -0.39/+0.35), and +0.039 (LA: -0.49/+0.55), respectively, for INR values lower than 2.0, between 2.0 and 3.0, and greater than 3.0. The overall precision coefficient of monitor INR was 0.370, while it was 0.23, 0.46, 0.29, and 0.21, respectively, in Centers 1, 2, 3, and 4. The overall variation coefficient was 6.5% while it was 3.7%, 8.5%, 4.7%, and 4.9%, respectively, in Centers 1, 2, 3, and 4. Coagucheck has an acceptable level of accuracy for INR values in the range between 2.0 and 3.0. A wide variation in monitor performance was found among centers
Accuracy of a portable prothrombin time monitor (Coagucheck) in patients on chronic oral anticoagulant therapy: A prospective multicenter study
A portable prothrombin time (PT) monitor allows patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) to measure their PT at home. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a portable PT monitor (Coagucheck, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) as compared with laboratory methods. The prospective study was conducted in four centers of the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics. A one-month instruction phase was followed by a six-month surveillance phase. Seventy-eight subjects on stable OAT (48 men, 30 women, age range: 18-75) were selected on a volunteer basis. Dual measurements of INR values were performed in each subject both from finger capillary blood by the monitor and from venous blood by the Anticoagulation Clinic laboratory in three instruction sessions. The mean difference (bias) of the monitor INR results when compared with the average of laboratory INR and monitor INR results was -0.025 (limits of agreement-LA: -0.84/+0.81 INR units). The mean bias was -0.0675 (LA: -0.37/+0.23), +0.018 (LA: -0.39/+0.35), and +0.039 (LA: -0.49/+0.55), respectively, for INR values lower than 2.0, between 2.0 and 3.0, and greater than 3.0. The overall precision coefficient of monitor INR was 0.370, while it was 0.23, 0.46, 0.29, and 0.21, respectively, in Centers 1, 2, 3, and 4. The overall variation coefficient was 6.5% while it was 3.7%, 8.5%, 4.7%, and 4.9%, respectively, in Centers 1, 2, 3, and 4. Coagucheck has an acceptable level of accuracy for INR values in the range between 2.0 and 3.0. A wide variation in monitor performance was found among centers. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd
Assessment of patient capability to self-adjust oral anticoagulant dose: a multicenter study on home use of a portable prothrombin time monitor (COAGUCHECK)
Background and Objectives. Self-testing and self-monitoring with portable prothrombin time (PT) monitors has been shown to be feasible and safe. However the ability of patients an chronic oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) to self-adjust their dose without specific training has never been properly evaluated. The aims of this study were to evaluate: 1) the ability of patients on chronic OAT to self-adjust their dose without specific training; 2) the integration of a portable PT monitor (Coagucheck, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) for home use into routine patient care in anticoagulationDesign and Methods. A nested case-control study was conducted in four centers of the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics (FCSA). Patients (n=78) on stable OAT for at least 6 months (cases: 47 men, 31 women, age range: 18-75 years) were enrolled on a volunteer basis after passing an Abbreviated Mental Test and providing informed consent. After three instruction sessions on the use of Coaguchek, subjects performed the PT test at home, communicated the INR results to the Center and suggested the dose adjustment and date for next control as they thought appropriate. However, they were requested to follow the prescription made by the Center. Controls (78 subjects) matched by age (+/- 5 years), sex and therapeutic range with the cases, were selected from among those who attended the anticoagulation clinics and managed by usual care.Results. When compared with the dose prescribed by the Clinic, the dose suggested by warfarin and acenocoumarol users was equal to or within +/- 6% of the mean weekly dose in 80% and 82% of suggestions, respectively. Time spent in the therapeutic range during the study was the same (80%) for cases and controls.Interpretation and Conclusions. Selected patients on chronic anticoagulant therapy can acquire a satisfactory ability for sell-adjustment of OAT dose without specific training. (C)2000, Ferrata Storti Foundation
Increased plasma level of vascular endothelial glycoprotein thrombomodulin as an early indicator of endothelial damage in bone marrow transplantation
We investigated the nature of hemostatic alterations occurring after bone marrow transplantation. In 45 patients, we evaluated the coagulation parameters, naturally occurring anticoagulants and thrombomodulin at days +15 and +22 after conditioning therapy. It was observed that endothelial cell damage is a central pathogenetic mechanism in some BMT complications. The increased plasma level of thrombomodulin after conditioning therapy is therefore discussed as a marker of endothelial cell injury. At day +15 a significant increase of fibrinogen from 276.1 mg/dl to 389.1 mg/dl was observed, while the natural anticoagulants all decreased significantly. Eleven patients with clinical complications related to endothelial damage had a significant thrombomodulin increase which, in uncomplicated patients, remained unchanged or resulted in lower than baseline values. Analysis of the data shows a strong correlation between clinical findings, reflecting endothelial cell injury and thrombomodulin increase when the increment is ≤ 30%. We found a significant elevation in thrombomodulin in 70% of clinical complications related to endothelial cell damage namely: septicemia, GVHD, VOD. There were four cases (or 9%) of false positive data, and only two (or 4.5%) of false negative results. We therefore propose thrombomodulin assessment as a valid parameter to monitor chemotherapy toxicity-related complications
Increased plasma level of vascular endothelial glycoprotein thrombomodulin as an early indicator of endothelial damage in bone marrow transplantation
Assessment of patient capability to self-adjust oral anticoagulant dose: a multicenter study on home use of a portable prothombin time monitor (Coagucheck)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Self-testing and self-monitoring with portable prothrombin time (PT) monitors has been shown to be feasible and safe. However the ability of patients on chronic oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) to self-adjust their dose without specific training has never been properly evaluated. The aims of this study were to evaluate: 1) the ability of patients on chronic OAT to self-adjust their dose without specific training; 2) the integration of a portable PT monitor (Coagucheck, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) for home use into routine patient care in anticoagulation clinics.
DESIGN AND METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted in four centers of the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics (FCSA). Patients (n=78) on stable OAT for at least 6 months (cases: 47 men, 31 women, age range: 18-75 years) were enrolled on a volunteer basis after passing an Abbreviated Mental Test and providing informed consent. After three instruction sessions on the use of Coaguchek, subjects performed the PT test at home, communicated the INR results to the Center and suggested the dose adjustment and date for next control as they thought appropriate. However, they were requested to follow the prescription made by the Center. Controls (78 subjects) matched by age (+/- 5 years), sex and therapeutic range with the cases, were selected from among those who attended the anticoagulation clinics and managed by usual care.
RESULTS: When compared with the dose prescribed by the Clinic, the dose suggested by warfarin and acenocoumarol users was equal to or within +/- 6% of the mean weekly dose in 80% and 82% of suggestions, respectively. Time spent in the therapeutic range during the study was the same (80%) for cases and controls.
INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients on chronic anticoagulant therapy can acquire a satisfactory ability for self-adjustment of OAT dose without specific training