A Lei Maria da Penha e a Intersetorialidade das Políticas Públicas no Atendimento às Mulheres em Situação de Violência Doméstica

RESUMO No Brasil, a violência contra mulheres se manifesta como uma das expressões da questão social com as quais atuam os Assistentes Sociais. Este trabalho apresenta a dinâmica da intersetorialidade entre as políticas públicas executadas no atendimento às mulheres em situação de violência doméstica. Para sua concretização realizou-se pesquisa bibliográfica, e uma pesquisa de campo, com uma entrevista semiestruturada, com duas profissionais de Serviço Social que atuam na Casa da Mulher Brasileira – Curitiba. O trabalho está organizado em dois itens; discussão teórica e apresentação dos relatos da pesquisa de campo. Como considerações finais, ressalta a importância, da Lei Maria da Penha para o atendimento de mulheres em situação de violência. Considera-se que por meio da intersetorialidade há melhor resultado para a garantia de direitos.  Palavras-chave: Intersetorialidade, Casa da Mulher Brasileira, mulheres vítimas de violência doméstica.  ABSTRACT In Brazil, violence against women manifests itself as one of the expressions of the social issue in which social workers deal with. This paper presents the dynamics of several sectors among the public policies used to help domestic abused women. For its accomplishment a bibliographical research and a field research were performed as well as a semi structured interview with two Social Workers who work at Casa da Mulher Brasileira - Curitiba. The study is organized into two items; theoretical discussion and presentation of field research reports. Finally, it highlights the importance of the Maria da Penha Law to help abused women. The authors believe the involvement of several sectors can guarantee rights. Keywords: Several Sectors, Casa da Mulher Brasileira, domestic abused women

Política de Assistência Social nos governos Lula: neodesenvolvimentista ou neoliberal?

RESUMOEste trabalho apresenta os resultados obtidos pelo projeto de pesquisa “Política de Assistência Social nos governos Lula: neodesenvolvimentista ou neoliberal?”, do Centro Universitário Internacional UNINTER ao longo dos anos de 2017 e 2018.  O projeto de pesquisa foi submetido à aprovação em fevereiro de 2017 e indicava a realização do trabalho em duas fases. Na primeira fase, ocorrida em 2017, foram analisados os conceitos de neoliberalismo e neodesenvolvimentismo como forma de oferecer subsídios teóricos para o segundo momento do projeto, ocorrido em 2018. A segunda fase compreendeu uma análise da Política de Assistência desenvolvida durante os governos Lula (2003-2010), buscando compreender qual foi a marca da política de governo. Nesse sentido, optou-se por uma análise do Programa Bolsa Família, o qual é tido como carro-chefe da Política de Assistência do Governo Federal nesse período.Palavras-chave: Neoliberalismo; Neodesenvolvimentismo; Programa Bolsa Família.ABSTRACTThis paper presents the results obtained by the research project “Social Assistance Policy on Lula administrations: neodevelopmentalist or neoliberal?”, at UNINTER International University Center, during 2017 and 2018. The research project was submitted for approval in February 2017 and the work was divided in two phases. In the first, which took place in 2017, the concepts of neoliberalism and neodevelopmentalism were analyzed to provide theoretical support for the second phase of the project, which took place in 2018. This second phase comprised an analysis of the Assistance Policy developed during the Lula administrations [as President of Brazil], from 2003 to 2010, seeking to understand what was the hallmark of that policy. To this end, the Bolsa Família Program was selected for an analysis, since it is considered the flagship of the Federal Government Assistance Policy during that period.Keywords: Neoliberalism; Neodevelopmentalism; Bolsa Familia Program.RESUMENEste trabajo presenta los resultados obtenidos por el proyecto de investigación “Política de Asistencia Social en los gobiernos de Lula: ¿Neodesarrollista o neoliberal?”, realizado en el Centro Universitario Internacional UNINTER a lo largo de los años 2017 y 2018. El proyecto fue sometido a aprobación en febrero de 2017 e indicaba la elaboración del trabajo en dos etapas. En la primera, desarrollada en 2017, se analizaron los conceptos de neoliberalismo y neodesarrollismo como forma de ofrecer subsidios teóricos para el segundo momento del estudio, llevado a cabo en 2018. La segunda etapa implicó el análisis de la Política de Asistencia desarrollada durante los gobiernos de Lula (2003-2010), tratando de comprender la marca de la política desplegada por el gobierno. En ese sentido, se optó por el análisis del Programa Beca-Familia, que es percibido como el plato fuerte de la Política de Asistencia del Gobierno Federal en ese período.Palabras-clave: Neoliberalismo; Neodesarrollismo; Programa Beca-Familia

a multicenter study

(1) Background: The Commercial Kit SIRE Nitratase® PlastLabor, is a drug susceptibility test kit used to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to first-line TB treatment drugs. The present study aimed at evaluating its performance in a multicenter study. (2) Methods: To determine its accuracy, the proportion methods in Lowenstein Jensen medium or the BACTECTMMGITTM960 system was used as a gold standard. (3) Results: The study revealed that the respective accuracies of the kit with 190 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, using the proportion methods in Lowenstein Jensen medium or BACTECTMMGITTM960 system as a gold standard, were 93.9% and 94.6%, 96.9% and 94.6%, 98.0% and 97.8%, and 98.0% and 98.9%, for streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol, respectively. (4) Conclusion: Thus, the kit can rapidly screen resistance to streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol. Additionally, it does not require sophisticated equipment; hence, it can be easily used in the laboratories of low and middle income countries.publishersversionpublishe

Detection of drug resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis strains using kit SIRE Nitratase®: a multicenter study

This research was funded by MINAS GERAIS STATE RESEARCH SUPPORT FOUNDATION (FAPEMIG), grants numbers 65/10 and CDS-APQ-03266-13, and by NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT (CNPQ) grants numbers 310174/2014-7 and 446796/2014-0.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Medicine. Mycobacteria Research Laboratory. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Medicine. Mycobacteria Research Laboratory. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Medicine. Mycobacteria Research Laboratory. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Medicine. Mycobacteria Research Laboratory. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Pharmacy. Department of Social Pharmacy. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Veterinary School. Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Rio Grande. Faculty of Medicine. Laboratory of Mycobacteria. Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.Federal University of Rio Grande. Faculty of Medicine. Laboratory of Mycobacteria. Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.Federal University of Rio Grande. Faculty of Medicine. Laboratory of Mycobacteria. Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Instituto Evandro Chagas. Ananindeua, PA, Brasil.Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado. Manaus, AM, Brazil.Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado. Manaus, AM, Brazil.Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Institute of Chest Diseases. Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Institute of Chest Diseases. Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Federal University of Grande Dourados. Faculty of Health Sciences. Dourados, MS, Brazil / Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, MS, Brazil.Adolfo Lutz Institute. Bacteriology Center. Tuberculosis and Mycobacteriosis Center. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Adolfo Lutz Institute. Bacteriology Center. Tuberculosis and Mycobacteriosis Center. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Adolfo Lutz Institute. Bacteriology Center. Tuberculosis and Mycobacteriosis Center. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.State Secretariat of Health of Rio Grande do Sul. State Center for Health Surveillance. Center for Scientific and Technological Development. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.State Secretariat of Health of Rio Grande do Sul. State Center for Health Surveillance. Center for Scientific and Technological Development. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. National Institute of Infectology Evandro Chagas. Laboratory of Bacteriology and Bioassays of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Sergio Arouca National Public Health School. Professor Hélio Fraga Reference Center. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Sergio Arouca National Public Health School. Professor Hélio Fraga Reference Center. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Nova University of Lisbon. Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Medical Microbiology Unit, Global Health and Tropical Medicine. Lisboa, Portugal.Nova University of Lisbon. Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Medical Microbiology Unit, Global Health and Tropical Medicine. Lisboa, Portugal.Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Faculty of Medicine. Tuberculosis Research Center. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Background: The Commercial Kit SIRE Nitratase® PlastLabor, is a drug susceptibility test kit used to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to first-line TB treatment drugs. The present study aimed at evaluating its performance in a multicenter study. (2) Methods: To determine its accuracy, the proportion methods in Lowenstein Jensen medium or the BACTECTMMGITTM960 system was used as a gold standard. (3) Results: The study revealed that the respective accuracies of the kit with 190 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, using the proportion methods in Lowenstein Jensen medium or BACTECTMMGITTM960 system as a gold standard, were 93.9% and 94.6%, 96.9% and 94.6%, 98.0% and 97.8%, and 98.0% and 98.9%, for streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol, respectively. (4) Conclusion: Thus, the kit can rapidly screen resistance to streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol. Additionally, it does not require sophisticated equipment; hence, it can be easily used in the laboratories of low and middle income countries