32 research outputs found
The Impact of Bilingual Labeling in the U.S. on Package and Product Evaluation
This paper explores the effect of bilingual (English-Spanish) product packaging on the perceptions of U.S. consumers toward the package and the product inside. Two experimental studies show that 1) products in bilingual packages are seen as targeting Hispanics living in the U.S., 2) package characteristics and the product itself are rated lower when the product is in a bilingual package versus an English-only package, especially among highly ethnocentric subjects, and 3) of the three bilingual formats tested (English on two sides with Spanish on the other two; an English paragraph followed by a Spanish paragraph on the same side; and alternating lines of English and Spanish on the same side), the alternating paragraph format is rated most favorably
How formulating implementation plans and remembering past actions facilitate the enactment of effortful decisions
Building on prior research studying effortful decision making and enactment processes (Bagozzi, Dholakia, & Basuroy, 2003; BDB), we identify and provide an in-depth understanding of two specific self-regulatory strategies: (1) formulating an implementation plan, and (2) remembering past actions, that decision makers can use in facilitating enactment of effortful decisions. The results of three experiments, in which the decision maker's goal and self-regulatory strategy were manipulated, showed that for goals that decision makers chose volitionally, the motivational effects of both these strategies lay in increasing levels of proximal implementation-related variables (implementation intentions, plan completeness, plan enactment, and goal realization) significantly. In contrast, for goals that were assigned to participants, these strategies' motivational effects additionally extended to significantly increasing distal goal-related variables (goal desire, goal intentions, perceived self-efficacy, and implementation desires). The theoretical implications of our findings are discussed, and future research opportunities are explored. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57372/1/562_ftp.pd
The Role of Regulatory Focus in the Experience and SelfâControl of Desire for Temptations
Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141440/1/jcpy163.pd
Geometric quantum computation using fictitious spin- 1/2 subspaces of strongly dipolar coupled nuclear spins
Geometric phases have been used in NMR, to implement controlled phase shift
gates for quantum information processing, only in weakly coupled systems in
which the individual spins can be identified as qubits. In this work, we
implement controlled phase shift gates in strongly coupled systems, by using
non-adiabatic geometric phases, obtained by evolving the magnetization of
fictitious spin-1/2 subspaces, over a closed loop on the Bloch sphere. The
dynamical phase accumulated during the evolution of the subspaces, is refocused
by a spin echo pulse sequence and by setting the delay of transition selective
pulses such that the evolution under the homonuclear coupling makes a complete
rotation. A detailed theoretical explanation of non-adiabatic geometric
phases in NMR is given, by using single transition operators. Controlled phase
shift gates, two qubit Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm and parity algorithm in a
qubit-qutrit system have been implemented in various strongly dipolar coupled
systems obtained by orienting the molecules in liquid crystal media.Comment: 37 pages, 17 figure
Hadamard NMR spectroscopy for two-dimensional quantum information processing and parallel search algorithms
Hadamard spectroscopy has earlier been used to speed-up multi-dimensional NMR
experiments. In this work we speed-up the two-dimensional quantum computing
scheme, by using Hadamard spectroscopy in the indirect dimension, resulting in
a scheme which is faster and requires the Fourier transformation only in the
direct dimension. Two and three qubit quantum gates are implemented with an
extra observer qubit. We also use one-dimensional Hadamard spectroscopy for
binary information storage by spatial encoding and implementation of a parallel
search algorithm.Comment: 28 pages, 10 figures. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (In Press
Recommended from our members
Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance: Evidence regarding corticosteroid use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited. Objective: To determine whether hydrocortisone improves outcome for patients with severe COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: An ongoing adaptive platform trial testing multiple interventions within multiple therapeutic domains, for example, antiviral agents, corticosteroids, or immunoglobulin. Between March 9 and June 17, 2020, 614 adult patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and randomized within at least 1 domain following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for respiratory or cardiovascular organ support at 121 sites in 8 countries. Of these, 403 were randomized to open-label interventions within the corticosteroid domain. The domain was halted after results from another trial were released. Follow-up ended August 12, 2020. Interventions: The corticosteroid domain randomized participants to a fixed 7-day course of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg or 100 mg every 6 hours) (nâ=â143), a shock-dependent course (50 mg every 6 hours when shock was clinically evident) (nâ=â152), or no hydrocortisone (nâ=â108). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was organ support-free days (days alive and free of ICU-based respiratory or cardiovascular support) within 21 days, where patients who died were assigned -1 day. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model that included all patients enrolled with severe COVID-19, adjusting for age, sex, site, region, time, assignment to interventions within other domains, and domain and intervention eligibility. Superiority was defined as the posterior probability of an odds ratio greater than 1 (threshold for trial conclusion of superiority >99%). Results: After excluding 19 participants who withdrew consent, there were 384 patients (mean age, 60 years; 29% female) randomized to the fixed-dose (nâ=â137), shock-dependent (nâ=â146), and no (nâ=â101) hydrocortisone groups; 379 (99%) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The mean age for the 3 groups ranged between 59.5 and 60.4 years; most patients were male (range, 70.6%-71.5%); mean body mass index ranged between 29.7 and 30.9; and patients receiving mechanical ventilation ranged between 50.0% and 63.5%. For the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively, the median organ support-free days were 0 (IQR, -1 to 15), 0 (IQR, -1 to 13), and 0 (-1 to 11) days (composed of 30%, 26%, and 33% mortality rates and 11.5, 9.5, and 6 median organ support-free days among survivors). The median adjusted odds ratio and bayesian probability of superiority were 1.43 (95% credible interval, 0.91-2.27) and 93% for fixed-dose hydrocortisone, respectively, and were 1.22 (95% credible interval, 0.76-1.94) and 80% for shock-dependent hydrocortisone compared with no hydrocortisone. Serious adverse events were reported in 4 (3%), 5 (3%), and 1 (1%) patients in the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with severe COVID-19, treatment with a 7-day fixed-dose course of hydrocortisone or shock-dependent dosing of hydrocortisone, compared with no hydrocortisone, resulted in 93% and 80% probabilities of superiority with regard to the odds of improvement in organ support-free days within 21 days. However, the trial was stopped early and no treatment strategy met prespecified criteria for statistical superiority, precluding definitive conclusions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02735707
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19
IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 nonâcritically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022).
INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (nâ=â257), ARB (nâ=â248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; nâ=â10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; nâ=â264) for up to 10 days.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ supportâfree days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes.
RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ supportâfree days among critically ill patients was 10 (â1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (nâ=â231), 8 (â1 to 17) in the ARB group (nâ=â217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (nâ=â231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ supportâfree days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570
Product Failure and Warranty Purchase: Their Effects on Target-Specific Emotions and Attitude Toward the Brand
This paper investigates the consumer affective responses to product failure as a result of making a decision to buy or not buy a warranty at the time of product purchase. Specifically, we present hypotheses about differences in consumers' emotional reactions to products failure, and consequently their attitude toward the brand, depending upon whether they have purchased product warranties. The hypotheses are derived by arguing that different types of counterfactual thinking and attributions are invoked under conditions of product failure or no product failure, and the purchase of a warranty or no warranty purchase by the consumer. Theoretical and managerial implications are briefly discussed
Cognitive appraisals of consumption situations leading to consumer emotions and action tendencies: A new approach to consumer responses.
Four contributions of this research are (1) redefining customer satisfaction to include specific emotions for a deeper and finer grained approach, (2) specifying the antecedents to specific emotions in order to better explain complex consumer emotional reactions, (3) testing a model for co-existence of different target specific emotions, and (4) testing predictions for specific action tendencies for consumer emotions. This research builds on a cognitive approach to emotions and can be cogently summarized as follows: A distinct set of appraisals of different antecedent conditions should lead to discrete emotions and for each emotion there is a more or less clearly differentiated coping response. Two studies were conducted to look at which appraisal conditions elicit discrete emotions and coping responses in a consumer service context. Appraisal conditions were manipulated via scenarios in both the studies. Study 1 involves application of the emotion approach to a marketing context (automobile repair). In this 2 x 3 experiment, the factors manipulated were two levels of motive inconsistency (high and low) and agency (self, other and circumstances). Data were collected from 200 students at the University of Michigan. Study 2 applies the emotion approach to a realistic service marketing setting (the movie going experience). The additional set of hypotheses investigated in study 2 addresses target specific emotions and coping with emotional reactions. The factors manipulated in this (2 x 2 x 2) study were motive consistency (positive and negative), pleasantness (pleasant and unpleasant) and causal agency (self and other). The dependent variable measures include manipulation checks, intensity of 25 emotions directed at four targets, and various action tendencies. Data were collected from 202 students from the University of Michigan. By using the approach to emotions recently proposed in psychology by Ellsworth, Roseman, Lazarus, and others in consumer marketing contexts, we were able to predict the specific emotions elicited and consumer responses to appraisals, given a set of antecedent conditions. Data analyzed from study 1 and study 2 show strong support for hypotheses.Ph.D.Cognitive psychologyMarketingPsychologySocial SciencesUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/129999/2/9711975.pd