122 research outputs found

    Coupling Matrix Compression Technique for High-Isolation Dual-Mode Dual-Band Filters

    Get PDF

    A Design Method of Multimode Multiband Bandpass Filters

    Get PDF

    Neutrino Physics with JUNO

    Get PDF
    The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO), a 20 kton multi-purposeunderground liquid scintillator detector, was proposed with the determinationof the neutrino mass hierarchy as a primary physics goal. It is also capable ofobserving neutrinos from terrestrial and extra-terrestrial sources, includingsupernova burst neutrinos, diffuse supernova neutrino background, geoneutrinos,atmospheric neutrinos, solar neutrinos, as well as exotic searches such asnucleon decays, dark matter, sterile neutrinos, etc. We present the physicsmotivations and the anticipated performance of the JUNO detector for variousproposed measurements. By detecting reactor antineutrinos from two power plantsat 53-km distance, JUNO will determine the neutrino mass hierarchy at a 3-4sigma significance with six years of running. The measurement of antineutrinospectrum will also lead to the precise determination of three out of the sixoscillation parameters to an accuracy of better than 1\%. Neutrino burst from atypical core-collapse supernova at 10 kpc would lead to ~5000inverse-beta-decay events and ~2000 all-flavor neutrino-proton elasticscattering events in JUNO. Detection of DSNB would provide valuable informationon the cosmic star-formation rate and the average core-collapsed neutrinoenergy spectrum. Geo-neutrinos can be detected in JUNO with a rate of ~400events per year, significantly improving the statistics of existing geoneutrinosamples. The JUNO detector is sensitive to several exotic searches, e.g. protondecay via the pK++νˉp\to K^++\bar\nu decay channel. The JUNO detector will providea unique facility to address many outstanding crucial questions in particle andastrophysics. It holds the great potential for further advancing our quest tounderstanding the fundamental properties of neutrinos, one of the buildingblocks of our Universe

    Real-time Monitoring for the Next Core-Collapse Supernova in JUNO

    Full text link
    Core-collapse supernova (CCSN) is one of the most energetic astrophysical events in the Universe. The early and prompt detection of neutrinos before (pre-SN) and during the SN burst is a unique opportunity to realize the multi-messenger observation of the CCSN events. In this work, we describe the monitoring concept and present the sensitivity of the system to the pre-SN and SN neutrinos at the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO), which is a 20 kton liquid scintillator detector under construction in South China. The real-time monitoring system is designed with both the prompt monitors on the electronic board and online monitors at the data acquisition stage, in order to ensure both the alert speed and alert coverage of progenitor stars. By assuming a false alert rate of 1 per year, this monitoring system can be sensitive to the pre-SN neutrinos up to the distance of about 1.6 (0.9) kpc and SN neutrinos up to about 370 (360) kpc for a progenitor mass of 30MM_{\odot} for the case of normal (inverted) mass ordering. The pointing ability of the CCSN is evaluated by using the accumulated event anisotropy of the inverse beta decay interactions from pre-SN or SN neutrinos, which, along with the early alert, can play important roles for the followup multi-messenger observations of the next Galactic or nearby extragalactic CCSN.Comment: 24 pages, 9 figure

    Potential of Core-Collapse Supernova Neutrino Detection at JUNO

    Get PDF
    JUNO is an underground neutrino observatory under construction in Jiangmen, China. It uses 20kton liquid scintillator as target, which enables it to detect supernova burst neutrinos of a large statistics for the next galactic core-collapse supernova (CCSN) and also pre-supernova neutrinos from the nearby CCSN progenitors. All flavors of supernova burst neutrinos can be detected by JUNO via several interaction channels, including inverse beta decay, elastic scattering on electron and proton, interactions on C12 nuclei, etc. This retains the possibility for JUNO to reconstruct the energy spectra of supernova burst neutrinos of all flavors. The real time monitoring systems based on FPGA and DAQ are under development in JUNO, which allow prompt alert and trigger-less data acquisition of CCSN events. The alert performances of both monitoring systems have been thoroughly studied using simulations. Moreover, once a CCSN is tagged, the system can give fast characterizations, such as directionality and light curve

    Detection of the Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background with JUNO

    Get PDF
    As an underground multi-purpose neutrino detector with 20 kton liquid scintillator, Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is competitive with and complementary to the water-Cherenkov detectors on the search for the diffuse supernova neutrino background (DSNB). Typical supernova models predict 2-4 events per year within the optimal observation window in the JUNO detector. The dominant background is from the neutral-current (NC) interaction of atmospheric neutrinos with 12C nuclei, which surpasses the DSNB by more than one order of magnitude. We evaluated the systematic uncertainty of NC background from the spread of a variety of data-driven models and further developed a method to determine NC background within 15\% with {\it{in}} {\it{situ}} measurements after ten years of running. Besides, the NC-like backgrounds can be effectively suppressed by the intrinsic pulse-shape discrimination (PSD) capabilities of liquid scintillators. In this talk, I will present in detail the improvements on NC background uncertainty evaluation, PSD discriminator development, and finally, the potential of DSNB sensitivity in JUNO

    Robust estimation of bacterial cell count from optical density

    Get PDF
    Optical density (OD) is widely used to estimate the density of cells in liquid culture, but cannot be compared between instruments without a standardized calibration protocol and is challenging to relate to actual cell count. We address this with an interlaboratory study comparing three simple, low-cost, and highly accessible OD calibration protocols across 244 laboratories, applied to eight strains of constitutive GFP-expressing E. coli. Based on our results, we recommend calibrating OD to estimated cell count using serial dilution of silica microspheres, which produces highly precise calibration (95.5% of residuals <1.2-fold), is easily assessed for quality control, also assesses instrument effective linear range, and can be combined with fluorescence calibration to obtain units of Molecules of Equivalent Fluorescein (MEFL) per cell, allowing direct comparison and data fusion with flow cytometry measurements: in our study, fluorescence per cell measurements showed only a 1.07-fold mean difference between plate reader and flow cytometry data

    Calculation Method of LN Function Cross-section Implicit Sensitivity Coefficient

    No full text
    For many new reactors, the uncertainty caused by nuclear data has become the main source of uncertainty in reactor physics design due to the higher uncertainty of measurement cross-section in the high energy region. Previously, uncertainty analysis for fast spectrum reactors mainly focused on explicit sensitivity coefficient calculation and uncertainty analysis, with less analysis of implicit effects and little analysis of the magnitude of their impact. The implicit effect of sensitivity coefficient is related to the processing method of resonance self-shielding cross-section, and due to the complexity of resonance self-shielding calculation, the implicit effect of sensitivity coefficient also becomes more complex. For example, for the problem of pressurized water reactors, implicit effects can be considered by solving the continuous energy spectrum slowing equation or changing the effective resonance integral table in the library. For thermal reactors, due to the need for neutron moderation to pass through the intermediate energy region with strong resonance self-shielding effect, the implicit sensitivity effect is relatively significant. When calculating the sensitivity coefficient, the implicit effect needs to be considered. For fast spectrum reactors (fast reactors), although the implicit effect is not very significant in theory, there has been no good method for calculating the implicit effect of sensitivity coefficients. The resonance self-shielding processing method based on background cross-section iteration is widely used in many reactor physics programs. A new implicit sensitivity effect analysis method based on the Bondarenko background cross-section iteration method was proposed in this study. The LN function was used to interpolate the background cross-section to represent the influence of cross-section disturbance on neutron spectra, and the influence was transmitted to the explicit sensitivity coefficient, thereby obtaining the sensitivity coefficient considering the implicit effect. Due to the fact that the implicit sensitivity coefficient of the cross-section is mainly related to the LN function, it is called as the LN function implicit sensitivity calculation method (LNIS method). A simple fast energy spectrum benchmark problem was proposed for the above method, and the implicit effect of the cross-section calculated by the new method was analyzed using the benchmark problem, proving the correctness of the method by comparison with the results of MCNP. For the proposed fast spectral benchmark problem, multi-group cross-section calculation was used. In the energy group with strong resonance self-shielding effect, the implicit effect correction of some nuclear cross-section sensitivity coefficients can reach a maximum of 50%. For the few-group cross-section, for most reaction channels, the accuracy of the keff relative sensitivity coefficient and uncertainty calculation after considering the implicit effect was significantly improved, but there were some reaction channels. Perhaps due to issues with Bondarenko and narrow resonance approximation itself, the improvement in sensitivity coefficient and uncertainty accuracy is not significant
    corecore