THE IMPACT OF THE SPECIAL GENERAL ELECTION JUDICIARY ON THE AUTHORITY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

This study aims to analyze the establishment of a special general election Judiciary and to analyze if the special Judiciary can take over the constitutional court’s authority in handling the electoral disputes without going through changes to Article 24-C of the 1945 Constitution especially paragraph 1. The approach applied in order to answer the problems and objectives of this research was a normative juridical approach. This study employed several approaches to legal issues including the Statutory Approach, the Conceptual Approach, and the Historical Approach. The results of this study explain that although it has been mandated in Article 157 paragraph (1-2) of Law No. 10 of 2016 on a special general election Judiciary. However, the constitutional court’s authority is still well-maintained until the 2024 general elections or amendments to Article 24-C to such an extent that it concerns electoral disputes. The constitutional authority cannot be transferred immediately to the Special Courts according to Articles 156 and 157 of Law No. 10 of 2016 because there is no amendment to Article 24-C. Therefore, the constitutional court’s authority is still well-maintained until the special court is regulated by a special law

The Connection of Authority between Central Government and Regional Government in Managing Mining and Forestry in Papua

Mining and forestry must be protected for the sake of benefit of the people. The protection of it can be seen in some regulation such as in Article 33 (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Law No. 11 Year 1967 concerning Basic Provisions of Mining has been replaced to the Law No. 4 Year 2009 concerning Mineral Mining and Coal, the Law No. 41 year 1999 concerning Forestry, the Law No 32 Year 2009 concerning Protection and Management Environment, the Law No. 23 Year 2014 concerning the Regional Government, and the Government Regulation No. 25 Year 2000 concerning Government and Province Authority as Autonomous Region. This research is categorized as empirical legal research or non-doctrinal legal research. It uses a juridical socio-cultural approach. It is conducted in the Province of Papua, primarily Jayapura, Kerom, Sarmi, Mimika, and Nabire Regency. Mineral mining and coals are non-renewable natural resources and they are national wealth that are controlled by the state for the greatest benefit of the people. Control upon mines by the state is conducted by the government and/or regional government. Government has the authority to determine the amount of production of every commodity per year in each province. The connection of authority between Central Government and Regional Government often overlaps jurisdiction in terms of their policies. To deal with such overlapping law icluding overlapping between the Law No. 21 Year 2001 concerning Special Autonomous of Papua and the Law No. 4 Year 2009 Governor of papua has issued the Governor Regulation No. 41 Year 2011 concerning Mineral, Metals, and Coal Mining Business to counterbalance the licensing act and mineral natural resources management even though eventually such regulation is not admitted by the central government. In the context of foresty, Licensing issues and authorities related with forest are regulated by the central government. The central government has not provided a room to regional government, and only a particular group of people with sufficient capital that could obtain license. After reform era, there are not any Regional Office in the province because currently it is handled in Forestry Department directly or Governor. Keywords: Connection of Authority, Central Government, Regional Governemnt, Mining and Forestr

Eksistensi hak atas adat setelah berlakunya otonomi khusus Papua di Kabupaten Biak Numfor

Hal 544-55

Eksistensi hukum hak atas tanah adat dan pendaftarannya pasca otonomi khusus Papua di kabupaten Biak Numfor

v, 146 h

Efforts to Improve the International Status of Biak Frans Kaisiepo Airport

This study aims to identify the existence of Biak's Frans Kaisepo Airport as an International airport. This research was conducted in Biak Numfor Regency. The data was collected through the interview method and then analyzed through descriptive and qualitative analysis. This study shows that the existence of a Regional Regulation (Perda) regulates the existence of the Airport. In the era of Papua's special autonomy, there is a possibility that there will be government compensation for the rights of indigenous peoples and there is no agreement between several clans who consider the customary land owners where the Airport was established, including the lack of public awareness in maintaining and protecting the Airport as a regional asset in increasing Regional Original Income (PAD), as well as efforts to improve community welfare based on the mandate of Law Number 1 of 2001 (Special Autonomy for Papua Province) and Law Number 1 of 2009 concerning Aviation

Inkonsistensi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia

Perubahan berbagai perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah tidak diikuti oleh perubahan berbagai perundang-undangan sektoral yang menyebabkan terjadi inkonsisten ketentuan undang-undang sektoral dan daerah. Permasalahan inkonsistensi aturan undang-undang dalam pelaksanaan kepemerintahan di daerah sebagai konsekuensi dari perubahan bentuk, model, dan pola format kebijakan hukum era reformasi. Penelitian ini mengkaji berbagai bentuk Inkonsistensi Undang-Undang Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dimana sumber data sekunder digunakan dalam menganalisis fokus penelitian yang diperoleh melalui kajian kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah melakukan berbagai langkah kebijakan untuk menata perundang-undangan pemerintahan daerah, yang tidak diikuti berubahnya ketentuan undang-undang sectoral menyebabkan terjadi tumpang tindih kewenangan pemerintah daerah dan pusat dalam pelaksanaan administrasi kepemerintahan di daerah diantaranya : 1) inkonsistensi kewenangan perundang-undangan sektoral dan Pemerintahan 2) inkonsistensi perundang-undangan dan implementasinya 3) inkonsistensi pendanaan / pembiayiaan 4) inkonsistensi penegakan hukum, dan 5) inkonsistensi pengawasan dan pembinaan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penataan kembali (identifikasi), evaluasi dan harmonisasi perundang-undangan sektoral agar sejalan dengan undang-undang pemerintahan daerah. Sehingga tidak terjadi tumpang tindih kewenangan antar sektor dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan antara Pusat dan Daerah