35,145 research outputs found

    Study of Λb→Λ(ϕ,η(′))\Lambda_b\to \Lambda (\phi,\eta^{(\prime)}) and Λb→ΛK+K−\Lambda_b\to \Lambda K^+K^- decays

    Full text link
    We study the charmless two-body Λb→Λ(ϕ,η(′))\Lambda_b\to \Lambda (\phi,\eta^{(\prime)}) and three-body Λb→ΛK+K−\Lambda_b\to \Lambda K^+K^- decays. We obtain B(Λb→Λϕ)=(3.53±0.24)×10−6{\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to \Lambda\phi)=(3.53\pm 0.24)\times 10^{-6} to agree with the recent LHCb measurement. However, we find that B(Λb→Λ(ϕ→)K+K−)=(1.71±0.12)×10−6{\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to \Lambda(\phi\to)K^+ K^-)=(1.71\pm 0.12)\times 10^{-6} is unable to explain the LHCb observation of B(Λb→ΛK+K−)=(15.9±1.2±1.2±2.0)×10−6{\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to\Lambda K^+ K^-)=(15.9\pm 1.2\pm 1.2\pm 2.0)\times 10^{-6}, which implies the possibility for other contributions, such as that from the resonant Λb→K−N∗, N∗→ΛK+\Lambda_b\to K^- N^*,\,N^*\to\Lambda K^+ decay with N∗N^* as a higher-wave baryon state. For Λb→Λη(′)\Lambda_b\to \Lambda \eta^{(\prime)}, we show that B(Λb→Λη, Λη′)=(1.47±0.35,1.83±0.58)×10−6{\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to \Lambda\eta,\,\Lambda\eta^\prime)= (1.47\pm 0.35,1.83\pm 0.58)\times 10^{-6}, which are consistent with the current data of (9.3−5.3+7.3,<3.1)×10−6(9.3^{+7.3}_{-5.3},<3.1)\times 10^{-6}, respectively. Our results also support the relation of B(Λb→Λη)≃B(Λb→Λη′){\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to \Lambda\eta) \simeq {\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to\Lambda\eta^\prime), given by the previous study.Comment: 8 pages, 1 figure, revised version accepted by EPJ

    Observational Test of Coronal Magnetic Field Models I. Comparison with Potential Field Model

    Full text link
    Recent advances have made it possible to obtain two-dimensional line-of-sight magnetic field maps of the solar corona from spectropolarimetric observations of the Fe XIII 1075 nm forbidden coronal emission line. Together with the linear polarization measurements that map the azimuthal direction of the coronal magnetic field, these coronal vector magnetograms now allow for direct observational testing of theoretical coronal magnetic field models. This paper presents a study testing the validity of potential-field coronal magnetic field models. We constructed a theoretical coronal magnetic field model of active region AR 10582 observed by the SOLARC coronagraph in 2004 by a global potential field extrapolation of the synoptic map of Carrington Rotation 2014. Synthesized linear and circular polarization maps from thin layers of the coronal magnetic field model above the active region along the line of sight are compared with the observed maps. We found that reasonable agreement occurs from layers located just above the sunspot of AR 10582, near the plane of the sky. This result provides the first observational evidence that potential field extrapolation can yield a reasonable approximation of the magnetic field configuration of the solar corona for simple and stable active regions.Comment: 25 pages, 11 figures. ApJ in pres

    Finite-size scaling of pseudo-critical point distributions in the random transverse-field Ising chain

    Full text link
    We study the distribution of finite size pseudo-critical points in a one-dimensional random quantum magnet with a quantum phase transition described by an infinite randomness fixed point. Pseudo-critical points are defined in three different ways: the position of the maximum of the average entanglement entropy, the scaling behavior of the surface magnetization, and the energy of a soft mode. All three lead to a log-normal distribution of the pseudo-critical transverse fields, where the width scales as L−1/νL^{-1/\nu} with ν=2\nu=2 and the shift of the average value scales as L−1/νtypL^{-1/\nu_{typ}} with νtyp=1\nu_{typ}=1, which we related to the scaling of average and typical quantities in the critical region.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figure
    • …
    corecore