22 research outputs found
The Passions and Disinterest: From Kantian Free Play to Creative Determination by Power, via Schiller and Nietzsche
I argue that Nietzscheâs criticism of the Kantian theory of disinterested pleasure in beauty reflects his own commitment to claims that closely resemble certain Kantian aesthetic principles, specifically as reinterpreted by Schiller. I show that Schiller takes the experience of beauty to be disinterested both (1) insofar as it involves impassioned âplayâ rather than desire-driven âworkâ, and (2) insofar as it involves rational-sensuous (âaestheticâ) play rather than mere physical play. In figures like Nietzsche, Schillerâs generic notion of playâwhich is itself influenced by Kantâs claim that aesthetic pleasure is orthogonal to desire-satisfactionâbecomes decoupled from his (further) Kantian view that aesthetic play essentially involves a harmony of sensuous receptivity and rational spontaneity. The result, I suggest, is a self-standing opposition between desires and passions. This motivates a recognizably Romantic vision of aesthetic disinterestedness, as freedom from desire realized in a state of creative determination by passion
Nietzsche contra Sublimation
Many commentators have claimed that Nietzsche views the âsublimationâ (Sublimierung) of drives as a positive achievement. Against this tradition, I argue that, on the dominant if not universal Nietzschean use of Sublimierung and its cognates, sublimation is just a broad psychological analogue of the traditional (al)chemical process: the âvaporizationâ of drives into a finer or lighter state, figuratively if not literally. This can yield ennobling elevation, or purity in a positive senseâthe intensified âsublimateâ of an unrefined original sample. But it can also yield drives that are attenuated or otherworldly, in a pejorative sense. One (but only one) kind of Nietzschean sublimation is the âtranslationâ of drives to âimaginative and spiritualâ (Imaginative und Seelische) modes of expression. I conÂclude that, despite certain appearances to the contrary, Nietzsche ultimately values basic drivesâ powerful expression, without preferring either that this occur specifically as âhigher cultureâ or as âsavageâ natural impulse
Revaluing Laws of Nature in Secularized Science
Discovering laws of nature was a way to worship a law-giving God, during the Scientific Revolution. So why should we consider it worthwhile now, in our own more secularized science? For historical perspective, I examine two competing early modern theological traditions that related laws of nature to different divine attributes, and their secular legacy in views ranging from Kant and Nietzsche to Humean and âgoverningâ accounts in recent analytic metaphysics. Tracing these branching offshoots of ethically charged God-concepts sheds light on how our ethical ideals and ideas of natural order can still be valuably integrated. Early modern intellectualists valued the law-governed order of nature as a sign of divine Reason. In turn, Reason traditionally ascribed to God has now been partly reclaimed for humans, reframing the value of natural order anthropocentrically, in terms of the value of our own intelligence. Alternatively, Reason may be reclaimed for nature itself, as in an âobjectiveâ idealism or metaphysical rationalism. However, beyond divine Reason, an influential voluntarist tradition in theology stressed a connection between laws of nature and Godâs Power or free Will. Tracking how divine Power has been reinvested in human beings provides a broader context for instrumentalism and related lineages of empiricism. But secularization can also transfer Power from God to the impersonal natural world. In this light, current scientific interest in lawlike order may also reflect the inherent value of brute necessity or inhuman causal power in nature: this is a deeper way to reject anthropocentrism and to show our respect for the environment
How Anti-Humeans Can Embrace a Thermodynamic Reduction of Timeâs Causal Arrow
Some argue that timeâs causal arrow is grounded in an underlying thermodynamic asymmetry. Often, this is tied to Humean skepticism that causes produce their effects, in any robust sense of âproduceâ. Conversely, those who advocate stronger notions of natural necessity often reject thermodynamic reductions of timeâs causal arrow. Against these traditional pairings, I argue that âreduction-plus-productionâ is coherent. Reductionists looking to invoke robust production can insist that there are metaphysical constraints on the signs of objectsâ velocities in any state, given otherâincluding far laterâstatesâ properties. The Past Hypothesis may thus be a metaphysical condition, not a physical law
Inconvenient Truth and Inductive Risk in Covid-19 Science
To clarify the proper role of values in science, focusing on controversial expert responses to Covid-19, this article examines the status of (in)convenient hypotheses. Polarizing cases like health experts downplaying mask efficacy to save resources for healthcare workers, or scientists dismissing âaccidental lab leakâ hypotheses in view of potential xenophobia, plausibly involve modifying evidential standards for (in)convenient claims. Societies could accept that scientists handle (in)convenient claims just like nonscientists, and give experts less political power. Or societies could hold scientists to a higher bar, by expecting them not to modify evidential standards to avoid costs only incidentally tied to error
(Mis)Understanding scientific disagreement: Success versus pursuit-worthiness in theory choice
Scientists often diverge widely when choosing between research programs. This can seem to be rooted in disagreements about which of several theories, competing to address shared questions or phenomena, is currently the most epistemically or explanatorily valuableâi.e. most successful. But many such cases are actually more directly rooted in differing judgments of pursuit-worthiness, concerning which theory will be best down the line, or which addresses the most significant data or questions. Using case studies from 16th-century astronomy and 20th-century geology and biology, I argue that divergent theory choice is thus often driven by considerations of scientific process, even where direct epistemic or explanatory evaluation of its final products appears more relevant. Broadly following Kuhnâs analysis of theoretical virtues, I suggest that widely shared criteria for pursuit-worthiness function as imprecise, mutually-conflicting values. However, even Kuhn and others sensitive to pragmatic dimensions of theory âacceptanceâ, including the virtue of fruitfulness, still commonly understate the role of pursuit-worthinessâespecially by exaggerating the impact of more present-oriented virtues, or failing to stress how âcompetingâ theories excel at addressing different questions or data. This framework clarifies the nature of the choice and competition involved in theory choice, and the role of alternative theoretical virtues
Inconvenient Truth and Inductive Risk in Covid-19 Science
To clarify the proper role of values in science, focusing on controversial expert responses to Covid-19, this article examines the status of (in)convenient hypotheses. Polarizing cases like health experts downplaying mask efficacy to save resources for healthcare workers, or scientists dismissing âaccidental lab leakâ hypotheses in view of potential xenophobia, plausibly involve modifying evidential standards for (in)convenient claims. Societies could accept that scientists handle (in)convenient claims just like nonscientists, and give experts less political power. Or societies could hold scientists to a higher bar, by expecting them not to modify evidential standards to avoid costs only incidentally tied to error
Symmetry Breaking in Few Layer Graphene Films
Recently, it was demonstrated that the quasiparticle dynamics, the
layer-dependent charge and potential, and the c-axis screening coefficient
could be extracted from measurements of the spectral function of few layer
graphene films grown epitaxially on SiC using angle-resolved photoemission
spectroscopy (ARPES). In this article we review these findings, and present
detailed methodology for extracting such parameters from ARPES. We also present
detailed arguments against the possibility of an energy gap at the Dirac
crossing ED.Comment: 23 pages, 13 figures, Conference Proceedings of DPG Meeting Mar 2007
Regensburg Submitted to New Journal of Physic