Clima organizacional, bienestar laboral y work engagement en una empresa de paqueteria

       El presente estudio está dirigido a determinar la relación entre el clima organizacional con el bienestar laboral y el Work Engagement, a través de un estudio cuantitativo, transversal y correlacional con un muestreo aleatorio simple n=72, un nivel de confianza del 90% y un margen de error del 5% en trabajadores de una empresa de paquetería. Se encontró en el análisis descriptivo que las dimensiones de clima organizacional (autotomía, confianza y apoyo) se encuentran adecuadas; mientras que los trabajadores reportaron un nivel medio de bienestar laboral; en lo que refiere al Work Engagement se identificaron niveles altos en sus dimensiones vigor, dedicación y absorción. Del análisis inferencial se encontraron correlaciones moderadas y positivas en equidad y bienestar laboral y; autonomía con Work Engagement. Se concluye que un adecuado clima organizacional se encuentra relacionado de forma positiva con Bienestar Laboral y Work Engagement. Palabras clave: satisfacción laboral, clima organizacional, bienestar en el trabajo

Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

Background Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)