The Flemish Organic Research & Knowledge Network: bridging research and practice for organic food and farming in Flanders

The Flemish Organic Research & Knowledge Network (FORK-Network) forms since 2012 the heart of research and knowledge exchange for the organic sector in Flanders. The Fork-Network involves CCBT, NOBL and BBN. Drivers of the network are participatory research and knowledge exchange and dissemination of knowledge tailored to farmers

Fodder trees for organic dairy goats

The tool offers a video in which a researcher explains the advantages of fodder trees for dairy goats and a farmer talks about his experiences with the plantation. Images of the plantation in early stage. It is targeted ar experienced farmers and advisors and is specific for organic farming, but can also be interesting for other dairy farmers. The suggested type of plantation is specific to a location (Flanders), but ideas and concepts are broader

Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface

Objectives: Composites may undergo biodegradation in the oral cavity. The objective was to investigate the effect of single- and multi-species biofilms on the surface roughness and topography of two composites. Methods: Disk-shaped specimens of a paste-like, Bis-GMA-free (Gradia Direct Anterior, GC), and a flowable, Bis-GMA- based composite (Tetric EvoFlow, Ivoclar-Vivadent) were prepared. After ethylene-oxide sterilization (38 degrees C), specimens (n = 3) were incubated with Streptococcus mutans or mixed bacterial culture (Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Actinomyces naeslundii and Fusobacterium nucleatum). As negative controls, unexposed specimens and specimens exposed to sterile medium (BHI) were used. Specimens exposed to acidified BHI medium (pH = 5) and enzymatic solution of cholesterol esterase served as positive control. Following 6-week incubation, the attached biofilms were collected for real-time PCR assessment, after which the surface roughness and topography of the specimens were analyzed with atomic force microscopy. Surface hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity was determined by contact angle measurements. Biofilm structure was analyzed with scanning electron microscopy. Results: Even though multi-species biofilms were thicker, with more cells attached, they did not significantly affect the surface roughness of the composites. On the other hand, S. mutans alone significantly increased the roughness of Tetric by 40.3%, while its effect on Gradia was lower (12%). The total amount of attached bacteria, however, did not differ between the composites. Conclusions: S. mutans can increase the surface roughness of composites, depending on their composition. This ability of S. mutans is, however, mitigated in co-culture with other species. In particular, bacterial esterases seem to be responsible for the increased composite surface roughness upon biofilms exposure. Clinical significance: Cariogenic bacteria can degrade composites, thereby increasing the surface roughness. Increased roughness and subsequent improved bacterial accumulation may facilitate the development of secondary caries around composites, which is the most common reason for the restoration failure.status: publishe

Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface

OBJECTIVES: Composites may undergo biodegradation in the oral cavity. The objective was to investigate the effect of single- and multi-species biofilms on the surface roughness and topography of two composites. METHODS: Disk-shaped specimens of a paste-like, Bis-GMA-free (Gradia Direct Anterior, GC), and a flowable, Bis-GMA-based composite (Tetric EvoFlow, Ivoclar-Vivadent) were prepared. After ethylene-oxide sterilization (38°C), specimens (n=3) were incubated with Streptococcus mutans or mixed bacterial culture (Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Actinomyces naeslundii and Fusobacterium nucleatum). As negative controls, unexposed specimens and specimens exposed to sterile medium (BHI) were used. Specimens exposed to acidified BHI medium (pH=5) and enzymatic solution of cholesterol esterase served as positive control. Following 6-week incubation, the attached biofilms were collected for real-time PCR assessment, after which the surface roughness and topography of the specimens were analyzed with atomic force microscopy. Surface hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity was determined by contact angle measurements. Biofilm structure was analyzed with scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Even though multi-species biofilms were thicker, with more cells attached, they did not significantly affect the surface roughness of the composites. On the other hand, S. mutans alone significantly increased the roughness of Tetric by 40.3%, while its effect on Gradia was lower (12%). The total amount of attached bacteria, however, did not differ between the composites. CONCLUSIONS: S. mutans can increase the surface roughness of composites, depending on their composition. This ability of S. mutans is, however, mitigated in co-culture with other species. In particular, bacterial esterases seem to be responsible for the increased composite surface roughness upon biofilms exposure. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Cariogenic bacteria can degrade composites, thereby increasing the surface roughness. Increased roughness and subsequent improved bacterial accumulation may facilitate the development of secondary caries around composites, which is the most common reason for the restoration failure

An EULAR study group pilot study on reliability of simple capillaroscopic definitions to describe capillary morphology in rheumatic diseases

Objective. To propose simple capillaroscopic definitions for interpretation of capillaroscopic morphologies and to assess inter-rater reliability. Methods. The simple definitions proposed were: normal-hairpin, tortuous or crossing; abnormal-not hairpin, not tortuous and not crossing; not evaluable-whenever rater undecided between normal and abnormal. Based upon an aimed kappa of 0.80 and default prevalences of normal (0.4), abnormal (0.4) and not evaluable (0.2) capillaries, 90 single capillaries were presented to three groups of raters: experienced independent raters, n = 5; attendees of the sixth EULAR capillaroscopy course, n = 34; novices after a 1-h course, n = 11. Inter-rater agreement was assessed by calculation of proportion of agreement and by kappa coefficients. Results. Mean kappa based on 90 capillaries was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.39, 0.54) for expert raters, 0.40 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.44) for attendees and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.52) for novices, with overall agreements of 67% (95% CI: 63, 71), 63% (95% CI: 60, 65) and 67% (95% CI: 63, 70), respectively. Comparing only normal vs the combined groups of abnormal and not evaluable capillaries did increase the kappa: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.65), 0.53 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.58) and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.62). On the condition that the capillaries were classifiable, the mean kappa was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.74) for expert raters (n = 65), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.83) for attendees (n = 20) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.89) for novices (n = 44). Conclusion. This multicentre, international study showed moderate reliability of simple capillaroscopic definitions for describing morphology of capillaries by rheumatologists with varying levels of expertise. Novices were capable of distinguishing normal from abnormal capillaries by means of a 1-h training session. In future studies, the class not evaluable may be obsolete. © The Author 2015