Community engagement practices at research centers in U.S. minority institutions: Priority populations and innovative approaches to advancing health disparities research

This paper details U.S. Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Community Engagement Cores (CECs): (1) unique and cross-cutting components, focus areas, specific aims, and target populations; and (2) approaches utilized to build or sustain trust towards community participation in research. A mixed-method data collection approach was employed for this cross-sectional study of current or previously funded RCMIs. A total of 18 of the 25 institutions spanning 13 U.S. states and territories participated. CEC specific aims were to support community engaged research (94%); to translate and disseminate research findings (88%); to develop partnerships (82%); and to build capacity around community research (71%). Four open-ended questions, qualitative analysis, and comparison of the categories led to the emergence of two supporting themes: (1) establishing trust between the community-academic collaborators and within the community and (2) building collaborative relationships. An overarching theme, building community together through trust and meaningful collaborations, emerged from the supporting themes and subthemes. The RCMI institutions and their CECs serve as models to circumvent the historical and current challenges to research in communities disproportionately affected by health disparities. Lessons learned from these cores may help other institutions who want to build community trust in and capacities for research that addresses community-related health concerns

Colorectal cancer risk assessment and screening recommendation: a community survey of healthcare providers' practice from a patient perspective

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Family history is a common risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), yet it is often underused to guide risk assessment and the provision of risk-appropriate CRC screening recommendation. The aim of this study was to identify from a patient perspective health care providers' current practice relating to: (i) assessment of family history of CRC; (ii) notification of "increased risk" to patients at "moderately/potentially high" familial risk; and (iii) recommendation that patients undertake CRC screening.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>1592 persons aged 56-88 years randomly selected from the Hunter Community Study (HCS), New South Wales, Australia were mailed a questionnaire. 1117 participants (70%) returned a questionnaire.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Thirty eight percent of respondents reported ever being asked about their family history of CRC. Ever discussing family history of CRC with a health care provider was significantly more likely to occur for persons with a higher level of education, who had ever received screening advice and with a lower physical component summary score. Fifty one percent of persons at "moderately/potentially high risk" were notified of their "increased risk" of developing CRC. Thirty one percent of persons across each level of risk had ever received CRC screening advice from a health care provider. Screening advice provision was significantly more likely to occur for persons who had ever discussed their family history of CRC with a health care provider and who were at "moderately/potentially high risk".</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Effective interventions that integrate both the assessment and notification of familial risk of CRC to the wider population are needed. Systematic and cost-effective mechanisms that facilitate family history collection, risk assessment and provision of screening advice within the primary health care setting are required.</p

Primary care physicians' use of family history for cancer risk assessment

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Family history (FH) assessment is useful in identifying and managing patients at increased risk for cancer. This study assessed reported FH quality and associations with physician perceptions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Primary care physicians practicing in two northeastern U.S. states were surveyed (n = 880; 70% response rate). Outcome measures of FH quality were extent of FH taken and ascertaining age at cancer diagnosis for affected family members. Predictors of quality measured in this survey included: perceived advantages and disadvantages of collecting FH information, knowledge of management options, access to supportive resources, and confidence in ability to interpret FH.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Reported collection of information regarding second degree blood relatives and age of diagnosis among affected relatives was low. All hypothesized predictors were associated with measures of FH quality, but not all were consistent independent predictors. Perceived advantages of taking a family history, access to supportive resources, and confidence in ability to identify and manage higher risk patients were independent predictors of both FH quality measures. Perceived disadvantages of taking a family history was independently associated one measure of FH quality. Knowledge of management options was not independently associated with either quality measure.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Modifiable perception and resource factors were independently associated with quality of FH taking in a large and diverse sample of primary care physicians. Improving FH quality for identification of high risk individuals will require multi-faceted interventions.</p

Ultraviolet and Visible Imaging and Spectrographic Imaging (UVISI) Data Processing Center (DPC)

International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 28-31, 1996 / Town and Country Hotel and Convention Center, San Diego, CaliforniaThe nine sensors and one image processor of the Ultraviolet and Visible Imaging and Spectrographic Imaging (UVISI) instrument aboard the Midcourse Space Experiment (MSX) satellite can potentially generate up to three gigabytes of data of data per day. The UVISI Data Processing Center (DPC) must execute a multitude of complex processing functions in a 24-hour operational window, verify the UVISI data and also provide a compact, quantified record of the verification. The Center additionally must support higher-level data analysis functions. Data processing functions are divided into pipeline processing and data conversion processing. Pipeline processing, which consists of the main pipeline process, Pipeline, and several auxiliary processes is responsible for generating Data Quality Indices (DQI) that summarize sensor performance and Data Measurement Indices (DMI) that summarize sensor measurements. Both sets of indices provide scientists and engineers with a compact, easily-reviewed record of instrument performance. The conversion process, Convert, supports data analysis by converting raw telemetry into scientific/engineering units. On a pixel-by-pixel basis, Convert provides functions for dark-correction, flat-fielding, gain and gate adjustment, non-linearity correction, and count-to-photon conversion. Operating in conjunction with Convert, a pointing utility, Point, is used to determine the locations of selected objects in inertial space. The accomplishment of these myriad tasks relies on a state-of-the-art computer network using multiple workstations. Normal DPC operations are fully automated but remain flexible enough to allow prompt intervention by the UVISI Performance Assessment Team (PAT).International Foundation for TelemeteringProceedings from the International Telemetering Conference are made available by the International Foundation for Telemetering and the University of Arizona Libraries. Visit http://www.telemetry.org/index.php/contact-us if you have questions about items in this collection

Can visual analogue scale be used in radiologic subjective image quality assessment?

Background Assessment of qualitative or subjective image quality in radiology is traditionally performed using a fixed-point scale even though reproducibility has proved challenging. Objective Image quality of 3-T coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was evaluated using three scoring methods, hypothesizing that a continuous scoring scale like visual analogue scale would improve the assessment. Materials and methods Adolescents corrected for transposition of the great arteries with arterial switch operation, ages 9–15 years (n=12), and healthy, age-matched controls (n=12), were examined with 3-D steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. Image quality of the coronary artery origin was evaluated by using a fixed-point scale (1–4), visual analogue scale of 10 cm and a visual analogue scale with reference points (figurative visual analogue scale). Satisfactory image quality was set to a fixed-point scale 3=visual analogue scale/figurative visual analogue scale 6.6 cm. Statistical analysis was performed using Cohen kappa coefficient and agreement index. Results The mean interobserver scores for the fixed-point scale, visual analogue scale and figurative visual analogue scale were, respectively, in the left main stem 2.8, 5.7, 7.0; left anterior descending artery 2.8, 4.7, 6.6; circumflex artery 2.5, 4.5, 6.2, and right coronary artery 3.2, 6.3, 7.7. Scoring with a fixed-point scale gave an intraobserver κ of 0.52–0.77 while interobserver κ was lacking. For visual analogue scale and figurative visual analogue scale, intraobserver agreement indices were, respectively, 0.08–0.58 and 0.43–0.71 and interobserver agreement indices were up to 0.5 and 0.65, respectively. Conclusion Qualitative image quality evaluation with coronary 3-D steady-state free precession MR angiography, using a visual analogue scale with reference points, had better reproducibility compared to a fixed-point scale and visual analogue scale. Image quality, being a continuum, may be better determined by this method

Can visual analogue scale be used in radiologic subjective image quality assessment?

Background Assessment of qualitative or subjective image quality in radiology is traditionally performed using a fixed-point scale even though reproducibility has proved challenging. Objective Image quality of 3-T coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was evaluated using three scoring methods, hypothesizing that a continuous scoring scale like visual analogue scale would improve the assessment. Materials and methods Adolescents corrected for transposition of the great arteries with arterial switch operation, ages 9–15 years (n=12), and healthy, age-matched controls (n=12), were examined with 3-D steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. Image quality of the coronary artery origin was evaluated by using a fixed-point scale (1–4), visual analogue scale of 10 cm and a visual analogue scale with reference points (figurative visual analogue scale). Satisfactory image quality was set to a fixed-point scale 3=visual analogue scale/figurative visual analogue scale 6.6 cm. Statistical analysis was performed using Cohen kappa coefficient and agreement index. Results The mean interobserver scores for the fixed-point scale, visual analogue scale and figurative visual analogue scale were, respectively, in the left main stem 2.8, 5.7, 7.0; left anterior descending artery 2.8, 4.7, 6.6; circumflex artery 2.5, 4.5, 6.2, and right coronary artery 3.2, 6.3, 7.7. Scoring with a fixed-point scale gave an intraobserver κ of 0.52–0.77 while interobserver κ was lacking. For visual analogue scale and figurative visual analogue scale, intraobserver agreement indices were, respectively, 0.08–0.58 and 0.43–0.71 and interobserver agreement indices were up to 0.5 and 0.65, respectively. Conclusion Qualitative image quality evaluation with coronary 3-D steady-state free precession MR angiography, using a visual analogue scale with reference points, had better reproducibility compared to a fixed-point scale and visual analogue scale. Image quality, being a continuum, may be better determined by this method

3.0T MR coronary angiography after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries—Gd-FLASH versus non-enhanced SSFP. A feasibility study

Background: Patency of the coronary arteries is an issue after reports of sudden cardiac death in patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) operated with arterial switch (ASO). Recent studies give rise to concern regarding the use of ionising radiation in congenital heart disease, and assessment of the coronary arteries with coronary MR angiography (CMRA) might be an attractive non-invasive, non-ionising imaging alternative in these patients. Theoretically, the use of 3.0T CMRA should improve the visualisation of the coronary arteries. The objective of this study was to assess feasibility of 3.0T CMRA at the coronary artery origins by comparing image quality with non-contrast CMRA in ASO TGA patients to healthy age-matched controls, and by comparing image quality with non-contrast CMRA to contrast enhanced CMRA in the patient group. Material and methods: Twelve patients, 9-15 years (mean 11.9 years, standard deviation 1.5 years), and 12 age-matched controls (mean 12.7 years, standard deviation 1.7 years) were examined with 3D balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP). Nine of twelve patients had Gadolinium-enhanced fast low-angle shot (Gd-FLASH) performed after SSFP. Image quality at the coronary artery origins was evaluated subjectively with a 10 cm figurative visual analogue scale (fVAS) and objectively by signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (SNR, CNR). Results: All, but one, coronary artery origins were identified. No significant difference in image quality scores was found between patients and controls with SSFP (mean values 6.5 cm—9.1 cm in patients and 7.0 cm—8.0 cm in controls, p-values > 0.1). With SSFP, intra-observer fVAS mean score was 6.7 cm—8.6 cm and with Gd-FLASH 7.7 cm—8.7 cm. CNR was higher with Gd-FLASH (p < 0.03). Intra-observer agreement index (AI) with SSFP was moderate-to-good (0.43–0.71) and with Gd-FLASH good (0.64–0.79) in all origins. Inter-observer AI was good in the left main stem (LMS) with SSFP (0.65). With Gd-FLASH inter-observer AI was good in LMS (0.78) and moderate (0.5) in the left anterior descending artery, but lacking in the other origins though with a good agreement on Bland-Altman plots. Conclusions: Our findings indicate a better, more reproducible image quality with Gd-FLASH than with non-contrast SSFP CMRA on 3.0T for evaluation of the coronary artery origins in ASO TGA children and adolescents