Unifying Large- and Small-Scale Theories of Coordination

Coordination is a ubiquitous feature of all living things. It occurs by virtue of informational coupling among component parts and processes and can be quite specific (as when cells in the brain resonate to signals in the environment) or nonspecific (as when simple diffusion creates a source–sink dynamic for gene networks). Existing theoretical models of coordination—from bacteria to brains to social groups—typically focus on systems with very large numbers of elements (N→∞) or systems with only a few elements coupled together (typically N = 2). Though sharing a common inspiration in Nature’s propensity to generate dynamic patterns, both approaches have proceeded largely independent of each other. Ideally, one would like a theory that applies to phenomena observed on all scales. Recent experimental research by Mengsen Zhang and colleagues on intermediate-sized ensembles (in between the few and the many) proves to be the key to uniting large- and small-scale theories of coordination. Disorder–order transitions, multistability, order–order phase transitions, and especially metastability are shown to figure prominently on multiple levels of description, suggestive of a basic Coordination Dynamics that operates on all scales. This unified coordination dynamics turns out to be a marriage of two well-known models of large- and small-scale coordination: the former based on statistical mechanics (Kuramoto) and the latter based on the concepts of Synergetics and nonlinear dynamics (extended Haken–Kelso–Bunz or HKB). We show that models of the many and the few, previously quite unconnected, are thereby unified in a single formulation. The research has led to novel topological methods to handle the higher-dimensional dynamics of coordination in complex systems and has implications not only for understanding coordination but also for the design of (biorhythm inspired) computers

Solving large-scale MEG/EEG source localisation and functional connectivity problems simultaneously using state-space models

State-space models are widely employed across various research disciplines to study unobserved dynamics. Conventional estimation techniques, such as Kalman filtering and expectation maximisation, offer valuable insights but incur high computational costs in large-scale analyses. Sparse inverse covariance estimators can mitigate these costs, but at the expense of a trade-off between enforced sparsity and increased estimation bias, necessitating careful assessment in low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) situations. To address these challenges, we propose a three-fold solution: (1) Introducing multiple penalised state-space (MPSS) models that leverage data-driven regularisation; (2) Developing novel algorithms derived from backpropagation, gradient descent, and alternating least squares to solve MPSS models; (3) Presenting a K-fold cross-validation extension for evaluating regularisation parameters. We validate this MPSS regularisation framework through lower and more complex simulations under varying SNR conditions, including a large-scale synthetic magneto- and electro-encephalography (MEG/EEG) data analysis. In addition, we apply MPSS models to concurrently solve brain source localisation and functional connectivity problems for real event-related MEG/EEG data, encompassing thousands of sources on the cortical surface. The proposed methodology overcomes the limitations of existing approaches, such as constraints to small-scale and region-of-interest analyses. Thus, it may enable a more accurate and detailed exploration of cognitive brain functions

Multistability and metastability: understanding dynamic coordination in the brain

Multistable coordination dynamics exists at many levels, from multifunctional neural circuits in vertebrates and invertebrates to large-scale neural circuitry in humans. Moreover, multistability spans (at least) the domains of action and perception, and has been found to place constraints upon, even dictating the nature of, intentional change and the skill-learning process. This paper reviews some of the key evidence for multistability in the aforementioned areas, and illustrates how it has been measured, modelled and theoretically understood. It then suggests how multistability—when combined with essential aspects of coordination dynamics such as instability, transitions and (especially) metastability—provides a platform for understanding coupling and the creative dynamics of complex goal-directed systems, including the brain and the brain–behaviour relation