A Study on Headache Disorder in Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia Review (October 2013)

Headache is the most common central nervous systemdisorders & one of commonest health problem (1).It has psychological, social & economic effect on the patients &their surrounding populations. Although many epidemiologicalstudies about headache disorders are performed yearly; they areonly partially documented. Those studies are performed mainlyin the developed countries & only few numbers of studies wasperformed in the developing countries because of the limitedresources & funding and the present of difficult to be reachedcites or villages.ObjectivesThe aim of our study is to define the problem of headacheworldwide & to compare the world wide studies & experienceswith studies published in Arabian Gulf countries & Kingdom ofSaudi Arabia (KSA); to gain better understanding of the burdenof headache & situation of headache care in our country; if it issatisfying the patient and if the health resources are well utilizedto decrease their suffering. Worldwide experience should be usedto put helpful solutions & to make the management of headachedisorders in our country more effective & efficient.MethodsReview of most relevant worldwide studies related tointernational headache epidemiology including Arabian Gulfcountries & burden of headache worldwide. We searched studiespublished on PubMed & Google scholar for the most relevant &updated studies.An electronic survey that was performed will be discussed to,those surveys were spread through social websites to get someideas about general populations & physicians opinions on recentstatus of headache care provided to headache patients & the ideaof initiating a specialized headache clinic in Kingdom of SaudiArabia.ResultsIn KSA; prevalence of headache was measured throughsmall number of studies; 1-year prevalence of all headache was63% & it is accounted for 13% of all neurological outpatients.More than one-third of school students were absent from schooldue to headache. Mean headache-attributed lost work-days perperson/year was 24.0 days for migraine, 6.6 days for Tension typeheadache (TTH ) & 53.4 days for medication overuse headache .The results of our 3 questionnaires show that; almost half ofour samples have monthly attacks of headache & around 10-15%have daily headache attacks. More than one third of theresponders mentioned that headache prevent them fromperforming their daily activity , it causes social isolation in morethan 20 % of them , in almost equal percentage it is affect theirrelations & it is affect the school or work attendance in 8.33-9.3% of them.Almost all of our responders agree that there is a need formore organization in management of headache cases & moreeducation for headache patients in KSA.ConclusionEpidemiological studies worldwide show that headache has ahigh prevalence & burden; most of the developed country initiateheadache organizations, programs that is aiming for physicianeducations & specialized headache clinic. Studies in KSA showthat headache is affecting people life & most of the patients donot know where to go to manage their headaches. Moreorganized headache care is needed & a Saudi headache societyshould be built to perform more studies & provide optimal carefor headache patients

Migraine-attributed burden, impact and disability, and migraine-impacted quality of life: Expert consensus on definitions from a Delphi process

Delphi; Migraine; DisabilityDelphi; Migraña; DiscapacidadDelphi; Migranya; DiscapacitatBackground Migraine-attributed burden, impact, disability and migraine-impacted quality of life are important concepts in clinical management, clinical and epidemiological research, and health policy, requiring clear and agreed definitions. We aimed to formulate concise and precise definitions of these concepts by expert consensus. Methods We searched the terms migraine-attributed burden, impact, disability and migraine-impacted quality of life in Embase and Medline from 1974 and 1946 respectively. We followed a Delphi process to reach consensus on definitions. Results We found widespread conflation of concepts and inconsistent terminology within publications. Following three Delphi rounds, we defined migraine-attributed burden as “the summation of all negative consequences of the disease or its diagnosis”; migraine-attributed impact as “the effect of the disease, or its diagnosis, on a specified aspect of life, health or wellbeing”; migraine-attributed disability as “physical, cognitive and mental incapacities imposed by the disease”; and migraine-impacted quality of life as “the subjective assessment by a person with the disease of their general wellbeing, position and prospects in life”. We complemented each definition with a detailed description. Conclusion These definitions and descriptions should foster consistency and encourage more appropriate use of currently available quantifying instruments and aid the future development of others.The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by Eli Lilly and Company

Framing education on headache disorders into the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 : the European Headache Federation stands ready

Framing education on headache disorders into the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The European Headache Federation stands ready

Prednisone for the treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with medication overuse headache: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of prednisone for treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with medication overuse headache (MOH). Patients and methods: In this prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel designed multicentre trial, 96 consecutive patients with MOH were randomized to withdrawal treatment with either 100 mg prednisone or placebo over 5 days. Patients were enrolled if they met the International Headache Society criteria for MOH and were diagnosed with migraine or episodic tension-type headache as primary headache. Exclusion criteria comprised significant neurological or psychiatric disorders. Withdrawal symptoms, including headache severity and intake of rescue medication, were documented for 14 days after randomization. Results: Patients treated with prednisone did not experience fewer hours of moderate or severe headache than patients receiving placebo. However, patients requested less rescue medication within the first 5 days. Conclusions: During withdrawal in MOH, prednisone reduces rescue medication without decreasing the severity and duration of withdrawal headache

Medication-overuse headache : a widely recognized entity amidst ongoing debate

Medication overuse in primary headache disorders is a worldwide phenomenon and has a role in the chronification of headache disorders. The burden of disease on individuals and societies is significant due to high costs and comorbidities. In the Third Edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, medication-overuse headache is recognized as a separate secondary entity next to mostly primary headache disorders, although many clinicians see the disease as a sole complication of primary headache disorders. In this review, we explore the historical background of medication-overuse headache, its epidemiology, phenomenology, pathophysiology and treatment options. The review explores relevant unanswered questions and summarizes the current debates in medication-overuse headache

The impact of fremanezumab on medication overuse in patients with chronic migraine: subgroup analysis of the HALO CM study.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide, in patients with chronic migraine (CM) with and without medication overuse (MO). METHODS: In a 12-week, phase 3 trial, patients with CM were randomized to fremanezumab quarterly (675 mg/placebo/placebo), monthly (675 mg/225 mg/225 mg), or placebo. Post hoc analyses assessed the impact of fremanezumab in patients with and without MO (monthly use of acute headache medication ≥15 days, migraine-specific acute medication ≥10 days, or combination medication ≥10 days) on efficacy outcomes, including headache days of at least moderate severity (HDs), and six-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQoL) questionnaire scores. RESULTS: Of 1130 patients enrolled, 587 (51.9%) had baseline MO. Fremanezumab reduced placebo-adjusted least-squares mean (95% confidence interval) monthly HDs (- 2.2 [- 3.1 to - 1.2] and - 2.7 [- 3.7 to - 1.8]; P \u3c 0.0001) in patients with MO and without MO (quarterly - 1.4 [- 2.3 to - 0.5], P = 0.0026; monthly - 1.4 [- 2.3 to - 0.6], P = 0.0017). Significantly more fremanezumab-treated patients had ≥ 50% reduction in HDs versus placebo, regardless of baseline MO (with: quarterly 70/201 [34.8%], monthly 78/198 [39.4%] vs placebo 26/188 [13.8%]; without: quarterly 71/174 [40.8%], monthly 75/177 [42.4%] vs placebo 41/183 [22.4%]). Fremanezumab improved HIT-6 and MSQoL scores. Significantly more fremanezumab-treated patients reverted to no MO (quarterly 111/201 [55.2%], monthly 120/198 [60.6%]) versus placebo (87/188 [46.3%]). CONCLUSIONS: Fremanezumab is effective for prevention of migraine in patients with CM, regardless of MO, and demonstrated a benefit over placebo in reducing MO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02621931 (HALO CM), registered December 12, 2012

Migraine-attributed burden, impact and disability, and migraine-impacted quality of life : Expert consensus on definitions from a Delphi process

Migraine-attributed burden, impact, disability and migraine-impacted quality of life are important concepts in clinical management, clinical and epidemiological research, and health policy, requiring clear and agreed definitions. We aimed to formulate concise and precise definitions of these concepts by expert consensus. We searched the terms migraine-attributed burden, impact, disability and migraine-impacted quality of life in Embase and Medline from 1974 and 1946 respectively. We followed a Delphi process to reach consensus on definitions. We found widespread conflation of concepts and inconsistent terminology within publications. Following three Delphi rounds, we defined migraine-attributed burden as "the summation of all negative consequences of the disease or its diagnosis"; migraine-attributed impact as "the effect of the disease, or its diagnosis, on a specified aspect of life, health or wellbeing"; migraine-attributed disability as "physical, cognitive and mental incapacities imposed by the disease"; and migraine-impacted quality of life as "the subjective assessment by a person with the disease of their general wellbeing, position and prospects in life". We complemented each definition with a detailed description. These definitions and descriptions should foster consistency and encourage more appropriate use of currently available quantifying instruments and aid the future development of other

Migraine-attributed burden, impact and disability, and migraine-impacted quality of life : Expert consensus on definitions from a Delphi process

Migraine-attributed burden, impact, disability and migraine-impacted quality of life are important concepts in clinical management, clinical and epidemiological research, and health policy, requiring clear and agreed definitions. We aimed to formulate concise and precise definitions of these concepts by expert consensus. We searched the terms migraine-attributed burden, impact, disability and migraine-impacted quality of life in Embase and Medline from 1974 and 1946 respectively. We followed a Delphi process to reach consensus on definitions. We found widespread conflation of concepts and inconsistent terminology within publications. Following three Delphi rounds, we defined migraine-attributed burden as "the summation of all negative consequences of the disease or its diagnosis"; migraine-attributed impact as "the effect of the disease, or its diagnosis, on a specified aspect of life, health or wellbeing"; migraine-attributed disability as "physical, cognitive and mental incapacities imposed by the disease"; and migraine-impacted quality of life as "the subjective assessment by a person with the disease of their general wellbeing, position and prospects in life". We complemented each definition with a detailed description. These definitions and descriptions should foster consistency and encourage more appropriate use of currently available quantifying instruments and aid the future development of other

Prednisone for the treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with medication overuse headache: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of prednisone for treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with medication overuse headache (MOH). Patients and methods: In this prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel designed multicentre trial, 96 consecutive patients with MOH were randomized to withdrawal treatment with either 100 mg prednisone or placebo over 5 days. Patients were enrolled if they met the International Headache Society criteria for MOH and were diagnosed with migraine or episodic tension-type headache as primary headache. Exclusion criteria comprised significant neurological or psychiatric disorders. Withdrawal symptoms, including headache severity and intake of rescue medication, were documented for 14 days after randomization. Results: Patients treated with prednisone did not experience fewer hours of moderate or severe headache than patients receiving placebo. However, patients requested less rescue medication within the first 5 days. Conclusions: During withdrawal in MOH, prednisone reduces rescue medication without decreasing the severity and duration of withdrawal headache