Tumor characterization using radiolabeled anti-cancer drugs in NSCLC patients

Hendrikse, N.H. [Promotor]Smit, E.F. [Promotor]Lammertsma, A.A. [Promotor]Yaqub, M.M. [Copromotor

Feasibility of salvage resection following locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy and consolidation durvalumab for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: In patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer, high-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation durvalumab improves the 5-year overall survival compared to CRT alone. The feasibility and safety of salvage surgery for such patients who subsequently develop locoregional failure (LRF) is unclear. We evaluated our institutional experience with radical-intent salvage surgery in this patient population. Materials and methods: Details of patients undergoing salvage surgery for locoregional failure after CRT and durvalumab were identified from an institutional surgical database. Each patient's case underwent multidisciplinary discussion at initial disease presentation, and again at time of progression. Results: Ten patients underwent salvage surgery for LRF after prior concurrent (n = 9) or sequential (n = 1) platinum-based high-dose chemo-radiotherapy followed by durvalumab. Consolidation durvalumab was completed in 4 patients, and discontinued in 6, due to either toxicity or disease progression. Median time between end of radiotherapy to detection of LRF was 19 months (range 6-75). Seven patients underwent a lobectomy, 1 a bilobectomy and 2 patients a pneumonectomy. Postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III-V) and 90-day mortality were 10% and 0%, respectively. Median follow-up after surgery was 7 months (range 1-25) during which 2 patients died (both 9 months post-operatively), one due to distant progression, and one of sepsis/ bleeding. Eight patients are alive at 1-23 months post-surgery, with 6 showing no evidence of disease. Conclusions: Our results suggest that salvage pulmonary resection can be performed safely in selected patients with LRF following chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab. This radical-intent treatment option merits consideration by multidisciplinary lung tumor boards.Thoracic Surger

Identifying advanced stage NSCLC patients who benefit from afatinib therapy using 18F-afatinib PET/CT imaging

Objectives: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors harboring common (exon19del, L858R) and uncommon (e.g. G719X, L861Q) activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are best treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) such as the first-generation EGFR TKI erlotinib, second-generation afatinib or third-generation osimertinib. However, identifying these patients through biopsy is not always possible. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate whether 18F-afatinib PET/CT could identify patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutations. Furthermore, we evaluated the relation between tumor 18F-afatinib uptake and response to afatinib therapy.Materials and methods: 18F-afatinib PET/CT was performed in 12 patients: 6 EGFR wild type (WT), 3 EGFR common and 3 EGFR uncommon mutations. Tumor uptake of 18F-afatinib was quantified using TBR_WB60-90 (tumor-to-whole blood activity ratio 60-90 min post-injection) for each tumor. Response was quantified per lesion using percentage of change (PC): [(response measurement (RM)?baseline measurement (BM))/BM]?100. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests, correlation plots and sensitivity/specificity analysis.Results: Twenty-one tumors were identified. Injected dose was 348 ? 31 MBq. Group differences were significant between WT versus EGFR (common and uncommon) activating mutations (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between EGFR common versus uncommon mutations (p = 0.94). A TBR_WB60-90 cut-off value of 6 showed the best relationship with response with a sensitivity of 70 %, a specificity of 100 % and a positive predictive value of 100 %.Conclusion: 18F-afatinib uptake was higher in tumors with EGFR mutations (common and uncommon) compared to WT. Furthermore, a TBR_WB60-90 cut-off of 6 was found to best predict response to therapy. 18F-afatinib PET/ CT could provide a means to identify EGFR mutation positive patients who benefit from afatinib therapy.Pathogenesis and treatment of chronic pulmonary disease

Cellular pharmacology studies of anticancer agents: recommendations from the EORTC-PAMM group

An increasing number of manuscripts focus on the in vitro evaluation of established and novel anti-tumour agents in experimental models. Whilst the design of such in vitro assays is inherently flexible, some of these studies lack the minimum information necessary to critically evaluate their relevance or have been carried out under unsuitable conditions. The use of appropriate and robust methods and experimental design has important implications for generating results that are reliable, relevant, and reproducible. The Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms (PAMM) group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) is the largest group of academic scientists working on drug development and bundle decades of expertise in this field. This position paper addresses all researchers with an interest in the preclinical and cellular pharmacology of anti-tumour agents and aims at generating basic recommendations for the correct use of compounds to be tested for anti-tumour activity using a range of preclinical cellular models of cancer

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Background: The neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently an area of active ongoing research. The place of neoadjuvant ICIs in the treatment guidelines needs to be determined. We carried out a systematic review of published data on neoadjuvant ICIs in resectable NSCLC to study its efficacy and safety. Patients and methods: A literature search was carried out using the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase databases to retrieve articles and conference abstracts of clinical trials measuring the efficacy [major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR)] and safety (failure to undergo resection, surgical delay, treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) grade ≥3) of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC until July 2021. Results: Nineteen studies with a total of 1066 patients were included in this systematic review. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy was associated with improved pathological response rates, especially in combination with chemotherapy. Using mono ICI, dual therapy–ICI, chemoradiation–ICI, radiotherapy–ICI, and chemo–ICI, the MPR rates were 0%-45%, 50%, 73%, 53%, and 27%-86%, respectively. Regarding pCR, the rates were 7%-16%, 33%-38%, 27%, 27%, and 9%-63%, respectively. Safety endpoints using monotherapy–ICI, dual therapy–ICI, chemoradiation–ICI, radiotherapy–ICI, and chemo–ICI showed a failure to undergo resection in 0%-17%, 19%-33%, 8%, 13%, and 0%-46%, respectively. The trAEs grade ≥3 rates were 0%-20%, 10%-33%, 7%, 23%, and 0%-67%, respectively. Conclusion: In patients with resectable NSCLC stage, neoadjuvant immunotherapy can improve pathological response rates with acceptable toxicity. Further research is needed to identify patients who may benefit most from this approach, and adequately powered trials to establish clinically meaningful benefits are awaited