Stellar feedback sets the universal acceleration scale in galaxies

It has been established for decades that rotation curves deviate from the Newtonian gravity expectation given baryons alone below a characteristic acceleration scale g†∼10⁻⁸ cm s⁻²⁠, a scale promoted to a new fundamental constant in MOND. In recent years, theoretical and observational studies have shown that the star formation efficiency (SFE) of dense gas scales with surface density, SFE ∼ Σ/Σ_(crit) with Σ_(crit)∼⟨p˙/m∗⟩/(πG)∼1000 M_⊙ pc⁻² (where ⟨p˙/m∗⟩ is the momentum flux output by stellar feedback per unit stellar mass in a young stellar population). We argue that the SFE, more generally, should scale with the local gravitational acceleration, i.e. that SFE ∼g_(tot)/g_(crit) ≡ (GM_(tot)/R²)/⟨p˙/m∗⟩⁠, where M_(tot) is the total gravitating mass and g_(crit) = ⟨p˙/m∗⟩ = πGΣ_(crit) ≈ 10⁻⁸ cm s⁻² ≈ g†. Hence, the observed g† may correspond to the characteristic acceleration scale above which stellar feedback cannot prevent efficient star formation, and baryons will eventually come to dominate. We further show how this may give rise to the observed acceleration scaling g_(obs) ∼ (g_(baryon)g†)^(1/2) (where g_(baryon) is the acceleration due to baryons alone) and flat rotation curves. The derived characteristic acceleration g† can be expressed in terms of fundamental constants (gravitational constant, proton mass, and Thomson cross-section): g†∼0.1Gmp_/σ_T⁠

A Flat Photoionization Rate at 2<z<4.2: Evidence for a Stellar-Dominated UV Background and Against a Decline of Cosmic Star Formation Beyond z~3

We investigate the implications of our measurement of the Lyman-alpha forest opacity at redshifts 2<z<4.2 from a sample of 86 high-resolution quasar spectra for the evolution of the cosmic ultraviolet luminosity density and its sources. The derived hydrogen photoionization rate is remarkably flat over this redshift range, implying an increasing comoving ionizing emissivity with redshift. Because the quasar luminosity function is strongly peaked near z~2, star-forming galaxies likely dominate the ionizing emissivity at z>~3. Our measurement argues against a star formation rate density declining beyond z~3, in contrast with existing state-of-the-art determinations of the cosmic star formation history from direct galaxy counts. Stellar emission from galaxies therefore likely reionized the Universe.Comment: 5 pages, including 1 figure, published by Ap

When Feedback Fails: The Scaling and Saturation of Star Formation Efficiency

We present a suite of 3D multi-physics MHD simulations following star formation in isolated turbulent molecular gas disks ranging from 5 to 500 parsecs in radius. These simulations are designed to survey the range of surface densities between those typical of Milky Way GMCs (\sim 10^2 M_\odot\,pc^{-2}}) and extreme ULIRG environments (\sim 10^2 M_\odot\,pc^{-2}}) so as to map out the scaling of the cloud-scale star formation efficiency (SFE) between these two regimes. The simulations include prescriptions for supernova, stellar wind, and radiative feedback, which we find to be essential in determining both the instantaneous per-freefall ($\epsilon_{ff}$) and integrated ($\epsilon_{int}$) star formation efficiencies. In all simulations, the gas disks form stars until a critical stellar surface density has been reached and the remaining gas is blown out by stellar feedback. We find that surface density is a good predictor of $\epsilon_{int}$, as suggested by analytic force balance arguments from previous works. SFE eventually saturates to $\sim 1$ at high surface density. We also find a proportional relationship between $\epsilon_{ff}$ and $\epsilon_{int}$, implying that star formation is feedback-moderated even over very short time-scales in isolated clouds. These results have implications for star formation in galactic disks, the nature and fate of nuclear starbursts, and the formation of bound star clusters. The scaling of $\epsilon_{ff}$ with surface density is not consistent with the notion that $\epsilon_{ff}$ is always $\sim 1\%$ on the scale of GMCs, but our predictions recover the $\sim 1\%$ value for GMC parameters similar to those found in sprial galaxies, including our own.Comment: 21 pages, 7 figures. Accepted to MNRA

Can magnetized turbulence set the mass scale of stars?

Understanding the evolution of self-gravitating, isothermal, magnetized gas is crucial for star formation, as these physical processes have been postulated to set the initial mass function (IMF). We present a suite of isothermal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations using the GIZMO code that follow the formation of individual stars in giant molecular clouds (GMCs), spanning a range of Mach numbers found in observed GMCs (⁠M∼10−50⁠). As in past works, the mean and median stellar masses are sensitive to numerical resolution, because they are sensitive to low-mass stars that contribute a vanishing fraction of the overall stellar mass. The mass-weighted median stellar mass M₅₀ becomes insensitive to resolution once turbulent fragmentation is well resolved. Without imposing Larson-like scaling laws, our simulations find M₅₀∝∼M₀M⁻³α_(turb)SFE^(1/3) for GMC mass M₀, sonic Mach number M⁠, virial parameter α_(turb), and star formation efficiency SFE = M⋆/M₀. This fit agrees well with previous IMF results from the RAMSES, ORION2, and SPHNG codes. Although M₅₀ has no significant dependence on the magnetic field strength at the cloud scale, MHD is necessary to prevent a fragmentation cascade that results in non-convergent stellar masses. For initial conditions and SFE similar to star-forming GMCs in our Galaxy, we predict M₅₀ to be >20M⊙⁠, an order of magnitude larger than observed (⁠∼2M⊙⁠), together with an excess of brown dwarfs. Moreover, M₅₀ is sensitive to initial cloud properties and evolves strongly in time within a given cloud, predicting much larger IMF variations than are observationally allowed. We conclude that physics beyond MHD turbulence and gravity are necessary ingredients for the IMF

Unravelling the physics of multiphase AGN winds through emission line tracers

Observations of emission lines in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) often find fast (∼1000 km s−1) outflows extending to kiloparsec scales, seen in ionized, neutral atomic and molecular gas. In this work we present radiative transfer calculations of emission lines in hydrodynamic simulations of AGN outflows driven by a hot wind bubble, including non-equilibrium chemistry, to explore how these lines trace the physical properties of the multiphase outflow. We find that the hot bubble compresses the line-emitting gas, resulting in higher pressures than in the ambient interstellar medium or that would be produced by the AGN radiation pressure. This implies that observed emission line ratios such as [O IV]25μm / [Ne II]12μm⁠, [Ne V]14μm / [Ne II]12μm⁠, and [N III]57μm / [N II]122μm constrain the presence of the bubble and hence the outflow driving mechanism. However, the line-emitting gas is under-pressurized compared to the hot bubble itself, and much of the line emission arises from gas that is out of pressure, thermal and/or chemical equilibrium. Our results thus suggest that assuming equilibrium conditions, as commonly done in AGN line emission models, is not justified if a hot wind bubble is present. We also find that ≳50 per cent of the mass outflow rate, momentum flux, and kinetic energy flux of the outflow are traced by lines such as [N II]122μm and [Ne III]15μm (produced in the 104K phase) and [C II]158μm (produced in the transition from 104K to 100 K)

On The Nature of Variations in the Measured Star Formation Efficiency of Molecular Clouds

Measurements of the star formation efficiency (SFE) of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in the Milky Way generally show a large scatter, which could be intrinsic or observational. We use magnetohydrodynamic simulations of GMCs (including feedback) to forward-model the relationship between the true GMC SFE and observational proxies. We show that individual GMCs trace broad ranges of observed SFE throughout collapse, star formation, and disruption. Low measured SFEs (<<1%) are "real" but correspond to early stages, the true "per-freefall" SFE where most stars actually form can be much larger. Very high (>>10%) values are often artificially enhanced by rapid gas dispersal. Simulations including stellar feedback reproduce observed GMC-scale SFEs, but simulations without feedback produce 20x larger SFEs. Radiative feedback dominates among mechanisms simulated. An anticorrelation of SFE with cloud mass is shown to be an observational artifact. We also explore individual dense "clumps" within GMCs and show that (with feedback) their bulk properties agree well with observations. Predicted SFEs within the dense clumps are ~2x larger than observed, possibly indicating physics other than feedback from massive (main sequence) stars is needed to regulate their collapse.Comment: Fixed typo in the arXiv abstrac