Validation of the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) Bleeding Severity Definition

Background This study evaluated the prognostic significance of a novel bleeding severity classification in adult patients undergoing cardiac operations. Methods The European multicenter study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) bleeding severity classification proposes 4 grades of postoperative bleeding: grade 0, no need of blood products with the exception of 1 unit of red blood cells (RBCs); grade 1, transfusion of platelets, plasma, or 2 to 4 units of RBCs, or both; grade 2, transfusion of 5 to 10 units of RBCs or reoperation for bleeding, or both; grade 3, transfusion of more than 10 units of RBCs. This classification was tested in a cohort of 7,491 patients undergoing CABG or valve operations, or combined procedures. Results The E-CABG bleeding severity grading method was an independent predictor of in-hospital death, stroke, acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy, deep sternal wound infection, atrial fibrillation, intensive care unit stay of 5 days or more, and composite adverse events of death, stroke, renal replacement therapy, and intensive care unit stay of 5 days or more. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the E-CABG bleeding severity grading method for predicting in-hospital death was 0.858 (95% confidence interval, 0.827 to 0.889). E-CABG bleeding severity grades 0 to 3 were associated with in-hospital mortality rates of 0.2%, 1.1%, 7.9%, and 29.0%, respectively (p <0.001), and with composite adverse events of 2.7%, 9.6%, 29.7%, and 75.8%, respectively (p <0.001). Conclusions The E-CABG bleeding severity classification seems to be a valuable tool in the assessment of the severity and prognostic effect of perioperative bleeding in cardiac operations

Predictive factors of long-term survival in the octogenarian undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement: 12-year single-centre follow-up

The improvement of life expectancy created more surgical candidates with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and age >80. Therefore, the main objective of this observational, retrospective single-centre study is to compare the long-term survival of octogenarians that have undergone surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) to the survival of the general population of the same age and to establish whether any perioperative characteristics can anticipate a poor long-term result, limiting the prognostic advantage of the procedure at this age. From 2000 to 2014, 264 octogenarians underwent AVR at our institution. Perioperative data were retrieved from our institutional database and patients were followed up by telephonic interviews. The follow-up ranged between 2 months and 14.9 years (mean 4.1 \ub1 3.1 years) and the completeness was 99.2 %. Logistic multivariate analysis and Cox regression were respectively applied to identify the risk factors of in-hospital mortality and follow-up survival. Our patient population ages ranged between 80 and 88 years. Isolated AVR (I-AVR) was performed in 136 patients (51.5 %) whereas combined AVR (C-AVR) in 128 patients (48.5 %). Elective procedures were 93.1 %. Logistic EuroSCORE was 15.4 \ub1 10.6. In-hospital mortality was 4.5 %. Predictive factors of in-hospital mortality were the non-elective priority of the procedure (OR 5.7, CI 1.28\u201325.7, p = 0.02), cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR 1.02, CI 1.01\u20131.03, p = 0.004) and age (OR 1.36, CI 1.01\u20131.84, p = 0.04). Follow-up survival at 1, 4, 8 and 12 years was 93.4 % \ub1 1.6 %, 72.1 % \ub1 3.3 %, 39.1 % \ub1 4.8 % and 20.1 % \ub1 5.7 %, respectively. The long-term survival of these patients was not statistically different from the survival of an age/gender-matched general population living in the same geographic region (p = 0.52). Predictive factors of poor long-term survival were diabetes mellitus (HR 1.55, CI 1.01\u20132.46, p = 0.05), preoperative creatinine >200 \u3bcmol/L (HR 2.07, CI 1.21\u20133.53, p = 0.007) and preoperative atrial fibrillation (HR 1.79, CI 1.14\u20132.80, p = 0.01). In our experience, AVR can be safely performed in octogenarians. After a successful operation, the survival of these patients returns similar to the general population. Nevertheless, the preoperative presence of major comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction and atrial fibrillation significantly impact on long-term results

Ablation of atrial tachycardia in the setting of prior mitral valve surgery

BACKGROUND: Data regarding catheter ablation of post-surgical atrial tachycardia occurring after mitral valve surgery are scarce. Through a search of the literature, this study aimed to assess the feasibility of catheter ablation and the characteristics of atrial arrhythmias ablated in these patients.METHODS: Studies assessing the main procedure parameters and the electrophysiologic findings of the investigated atrial tachycardia were selected. The electrophysiologic mechanism (focal vs. reentrant arrhythmias), site of arrhythmia origin (left atrium vs. right atrium) and their anatomic correlation with specific surgical access and/or prior Cox-Maze IV procedure were all addressed.RESULTS: Eleven studies including 206 patients undergoing catheter ablation of 297 post-surgical arrhythmia morphologies occurring after mitral valve surgery were considered. Major complications were observed in 2 patients only (0.9%). Restoration of sinus rhythm was achieved in 96% of patients. Macro-reentrant arrhythmia was mostly observed (90.4%) with a non-negligible proportion of focal arrhythmia (9.6%). Left-sided arrhythmia was common (54.4%,) but cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent arrhythmia was frequently reported (33%). Although specific atriotomies showed trends towards peculiar locations of the investigated arrhythmia, Cox-Maze IV procedure was the only independent predictor for left-sided arrhythmia (OR=17.3; 95% CI 7.2-41.2; p<0.0001).CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation of post-surgical arrhythmia occurring after mitral valve surgery is feasible, and, in this setting, the vast majority of the arrhythmia morphologies are based on macroreentry and in about one third of cases show cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent arrhythmia. Prior Cox-Maze-IV associated with mitral valve surgery is an independent predictor of left-sided arrhythmia possibly due to non-transmural surgical lesions

Safety and Efficacy of Biatrial vs. Left Atrial Surgical Ablation During Concomitant Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies With a Focus on the Causes of Pacemaker Implantation

Introduction: The latest STS guidelines recommend concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation not only during mitral surgery (Class IA) but also during other\u2010than mitral cardiac surgery procedures (Class IB) in patients with preoperative AF. Conventional Cox\u2010Maze III/IV procedures are performed on both atria (BA), but several studies reported excellent results with left atrial only (LA) ablations: the scope of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of BA vs LA approach. Methods and Results: Pubmed, Scopus, and WOS were searched from inception to November 2018: 28 studies including 7065 patients and comparing the performance of BA vs LA approaches were identified: of these, 16 (57.1%) enrolled exclusively patients with non\u2010paroxysmal AF forms, 10 (35.7%) focused on mitral surgery as main procedure, and 16 (57.1%) regarded patients undergone Cox\u2010Maze with radiofrequency. The 6\u2010 and 12\u2010months prevalence of sinus rhythm were higher in the BA group (OR, 1.37, CI, 1.09\u20101.73, P = .008 and OR, 1.37, CI, 0.99\u20101.88, P = .05 respectively). Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (OR, 1.85, CI, 1.38\u20102.49,P < .0001) and reopening for bleeding (OR, 1.70, CI, 1.05\u20102.75, P = .03) were higher in the BA group. Among patients undergone PPM implantation, BA group had a significantly higher risk of sinoatrial node dysfunction (OR, 3.01, CI, 1.49\u20106.07,P = .002). Conclusions: Concomitant BA ablation appears superior to LA ablation in terms of efficacy but is associated with a higher risk of bleeding and of PPM implantation, more frequently due to sinoatrial node dysfunction. LA approach should be preferable in patients with a higher risk of bleeding or with perioperative risk factors for PPM implantation

Mycobacterium chimaera infections following cardiac surgery in Italy: results from a National Survey Endorsed by the Italian Society of Cardiac Surgery

AIMS: A global outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera infections following cardiac surgery and linked to contaminated heater-cooler units (HCUs) is currently ongoing. Neither the status of this outbreak in Italy nor the mitigation strategies adopted by adult cardiac surgery units (ACSUs) are currently known. In 2017, the Italian Society of Cardiac Surgery launched a national survey among the Italian ACSU to shed some light on this issue.METHODS: In Italy, there are 90 ACSUs across 20 regions. From May to November 2017, these ACSUs were surveyed collecting data on patients diagnosed with MC infections, ACSU workload, HCU models in use and control measures adopted in the operatory room.RESULTS: The response rate was 87.8%. The median number of cardiac procedures at each ACSU was 450/year [interquartile range (IQR) 350-650\u200aprocedures/year], and nationally, the number of procedures/year exceeded 40k. In Italy, seven patients with M. chimaera infections following cardiac procedures have been reported since 2015: all had aortic or valvular surgery as the first procedure; the median latency between the first operation and the infection was 2 years (IQR 2-3.25). Mortality for patients requiring redo cardiac surgery was 50%. M. chimaera infections risk was 0.4-1 patient every 1000 cardiac procedures. The most common HCU model in Italy is the 3T HCU (70.9%). The most common control measures adopted included implementing new HCU disinfection protocols, using sterile or filtrated water in the HCU and displacing HCU fans away from the patient: HCU replacement and microbiology testing were instead infrequent.CONCLUSION: In Italy, the risk of contracting M. chimaera infections and the mortality reported are in line with other European countries, but significant heterogeneity exists on the mitigation strategies adopted to prevent further M. chimaera inoculations, suggesting the development of national guidelines

The Preoperative Inflammatory Status Affects the Clinical Outcome in Cardiac Surgery

Aims: There are many reasons for the increase in post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery. In fact, an activated inflammatory state before cardiac surgery, can potentially worsen the patient’s prognosis and the effects of this preoperative inflammatory state in the medium-term remains unknown. Methods: There were 470 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery, and were divided in three groups according to the median values of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen (FBG): The first group was the low inflammatory status group (LIS) with 161 patients (CRP < 0.39 mg/dL and FBG < 366 mg/dL); the second was the medium inflammatory status group (MIS) with 150 patients (CRP < 0.39 mg/dL and FBG ≥ 366 mg/dL or CRP ≥ 0.39 mg/dL and FBG < 366 mg/dL,); and the third was the high inflammatory status group (HIS) with 159 patients (CRP ≥ 0.39 mg/dL and FBG ≥ 366 mg/dL,). Results: The parameters to be considered for the patients before surgery were similar between the three groups except, however, for age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the presence of arterial hypertension. The operative mortality was not significantly different between the groups (LIS = 2.5%, MIS = 6%, HIS = 6.9%, p = 0.16) while mortality for sepsis was significantly different (LIS = 0%, MIS = 1.3%, HIS = 3.7%, p = 0.03). The infections were more frequent in the HIS group (p = 0.0002). The HIS group resulted in an independent risk factor for infections (relative risk (RR) = 3.1, confidence interval (CI) = 1.2–7.9, p = 0.02). During the 48-months follow-up, survival was lower for the HIS patients. This HIS group (RR = 2.39, CI = 1.03–5.53, p = 0.05) and LVEF (RR = 0.96, CI = 0.92–0.99, p = 0.04) resulted in independent risk factors for mortality during the follow-up. Conclusions: The patients undergoing cardiac surgery with a preoperative highly activated inflammatory status are at a higher risk of post-operative infections. Furthermore, during the intermediate follow-up, the preoperative highly activated inflammatory status and LVEF resulted in independent risk factors for mortality

Hybrid three-stage repair of mega aorta with Lupiae technique: Tips and tricks

Mega aorta syndrome (MAS) poses a complex clinical challenge: the involvement of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending thoracic and abdominal aorta with extension below the origin of renal arteries requires almost total replacement of the aorta. The modality of treatment remains still controversial. Different aortic debranching techniques have been developed to re-route the origin of epiaortic and visceral vessels and achieve an optimal landing zone for implantation of subsequent endovascular grafts. We illustrate the Lupiae technique as a further evolution of the aortic debranching and hybrid repair of a mega aorta. It was developed with the purpose to exclude a very long segment of diseased aorta by implanting two or more endoprostheses between two surgically-generated landing zones. We describe a series of 27 patients treated by this hybrid three-stage mega-aorta repair; the tips and tricks discussed here facilitate a safe and effective procedure, enable treatment of frail patients and help to avoid life-threatening complications