38 research outputs found

    Strong microsite control of seedling recruitment in tundra

    Get PDF
    The inclusion of environmental variation in studies of recruitment is a prerequisite for realistic predictions of the responses of vegetation to a changing environment. We investigated how seedling recruitment is affected by seed availability and microsite quality along a steep environmental gradient in dry tundra. A survey of natural seed rain and seedling density in vegetation was combined with observations of the establishment of 14 species after sowing into intact or disturbed vegetation. Although seed rain density was closely correlated with natural seedling establishment, the experimental seed addition showed that the microsite environment was even more important. For all species, seedling emergence peaked at the productive end of the gradient, irrespective of the adult niches realized. Disturbance promoted recruitment at all positions along the environmental gradient, not just at high productivity. Early seedling emergence constituted the main temporal bottleneck in recruitment for all species. Surprisingly, winter mortality was highest at what appeared to be the most benign end of the gradient. The results highlight that seedling recruitment patterns are largely determined by the earliest stages in seedling emergence, which again are closely linked to microsite quality. A fuller understanding of microsite effects on recruitment with implications for plant community assembly and vegetation change is provided

    Mechanismic approaches to explanation in ecology

    No full text
    The search for mechanisms and their description of explanatory and predictive purposes has been, and continues to be, a common practice in scientific research, even after the decline of classical mechanism. However, from the empiricist critique of causality and especially during the second third of the twentieth century, other perspectives came to the forefront of the discussion in the philosophy of scientific explanation. In particular, the deductivist approach of the covering-law model shaped the debate over the nature of explanation in science during some three or four decades, despite the insistent criticisms of authors like Michael Scriven who pointed to the importance of describing the relevant causes for understanding a given fact. The hegemony of the deductivist approach to scientific explanation diminished significantly with the admission of the existence of irreducible random facts, which elicited a wave of failed attempts to construct an inductive model of explanation. The sustained effort of authors such as Mario Bunge and Wesley Salmon contributed to restoring to the causality the respectability that had lost at the hands of the radical wing of empiricism, first due to the Humean critique and later with the general rejection of the metaphysics that professed the logical empiricists. With the decline of logical empiricism, attempts to develop a causal perspective of scientific explanation thrived, and the causal model came to share the hitherto exclusive role of the deductivist perspective in the philosophy of scientific explanation. At present, the field is paying renewed attention to the description of mechanisms, especially causal ones, as a central aspect of explanation and other research practices in several areas of science. This approach offers viable solutions to the various ontological and methodological objections that are opposed to the two traditional approaches (the purely deductive and the purely causal). In this essay we will review the basic characteristics of a bunch of philosophical proposals that highlight the description of mechanisms as a central element to explanation in science and we will briefly discuss its suitability for the field of ecology.Fil: Gonzalez del Solar, Rafael. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaFil: Marone, Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; ArgentinaFil: Lopez de Casenave, Javier Nestor. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentin
    corecore