34 research outputs found
A Naturally Occurring Mutation of the Opsin Gene (T4R) in Dogs Affects Glycosylation and Stability of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor
Rho (rhodopsin; opsin plus 11-cis-retinal) is a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor responsible for the capture of a photon in retinal photoreceptor cells. A large number of mutations in the opsin gene associated with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa have been identified. The naturally occurring T4R opsin mutation in the English mastiff dog leads to a progressive retinal degeneration that closely resembles human retinitis pigmentosa caused by the T4K mutation in the opsin gene. Using genetic approaches and biochemical assays, we explored the properties of the T4R mutant protein. Employing immunoaffinity-purified Rho from affected RHOT4R/T4R dog retina, we found that the mutation abolished glycosylation at Asn2, whereas glycosylation at Asn15 was unaffected, and the mutant opsin localized normally to the rod outer segments. Moreover, we found that T4R Rho* lost its chromophore faster as measured by the decay of meta-rhodopsin II and that it was less resistant to heat denaturation. Detergent-solubilized T4R opsin regenerated poorly and interacted abnormally with the G protein transducin (Gt). Structurally, the mutation affected mainly the “plug” at the intradiscal (extracellular) side of Rho, which is possibly responsible for protecting the chromophore from the access of bulk water. The T4R mutation may represent a novel molecular mechanism of degeneration where the unliganded form of the mutant opsin exerts a detrimental effect by losing its structural integrity
Proteomics of Primary Uveal Melanoma: Insights into Metastasis and Protein Biomarkers
SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study pursued the proteomic analysis of primary uveal melanoma (pUM) for insights into the mechanisms of metastasis and protein biomarkers. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry quantitative proteomic technology was used to analyze 53 metastasizing and 47 non-metastasizing pUM. The determined proteome of 3935 proteins was very similar between the metastasizing and non-metastasizing pUM, but included the identification of 402 differentially expressed (DE) proteins. Bioinformatic analyses suggest significant differences in the immune response between metastasizing and non-metastasizing pUM. Immune protein profiling results were consistent with transcriptomic studies, showing the immune-suppressive nature and low abundance of immune checkpoint regulators in pUM, and suggest CDH1, HLA-DPA1, and several DE immune kinases and phosphatases as potential targets for immune therapy checkpoint blockade. Prediction modeling of the proteomic data identified 32 proteins capable of predicting metastasizing versus non-metastasizing pUM with 93% discriminatory accuracy. ABSTRACT: Uveal melanoma metastases are lethal and remain incurable. A quantitative proteomic analysis of 53 metastasizing and 47 non-metastasizing primary uveal melanoma (pUM) was pursued for insights into UM metastasis and protein biomarkers. The metastatic status of the pUM specimens was defined based on clinical data, survival histories, prognostic analyses, and liver histopathology. LC MS/MS iTRAQ technology, the Mascot search engine, and the UniProt human database were used to identify and quantify pUM proteins relative to the normal choroid excised from UM donor eyes. The determined proteomes of all 100 tumors were very similar, encompassing a total of 3935 pUM proteins. Proteins differentially expressed (DE) between metastasizing and non-metastasizing pUM (n = 402) were employed in bioinformatic analyses that predicted significant differences in the immune system between metastasizing and non-metastasizing pUM. The immune proteins (n = 778) identified in this study support the immune-suppressive nature and low abundance of immune checkpoint regulators in pUM, and suggest CDH1, HLA-DPA1, and several DE immune kinases and phosphatases as possible candidates for immune therapy checkpoint blockade. Prediction modeling identified 32 proteins capable of predicting metastasizing versus non-metastasizing pUM with 93% discriminatory accuracy, supporting the potential for protein-based prognostic methods for detecting UM metastasis
Substrate Specificity of Mammalian Prenyl Protein-Specific Endoprotease Activity<sup>†</sup>
We have previously identified proteolytic activity in rat liver
microsomes that cleaves an intact
tripeptide, VIS, from S-farnesylated-CVIS tetrapeptide.
This enzymatic activity, termed prenyl protein-specific endoprotease (PPEP) activity, has been solubilized in CHAPS and
purified 5-fold. To probe the
peptide recognition features of PPEP activity, 64 tripeptides
[N-acetyl-C(S-farnesyl)a1a2]
were prepared
and tested as competitive inhibitors of PPEP activity-catalyzed
hydrolysis of
N-acetyl-C(S-farnesyl)VI[3H]S. It was found that PPEP activity prefers large
hydrophobic residues in the a1 and a2
positions. A
subset of
N-acetyl-C(S-farnesyl)a1a2
peptides were prepared in radiolabeled form, and it was found
that
PPEP activity preferences for these substrates correlated well in most
cases with the inhibition data. The
exception is that R in the a1 position does not prevent
binding of peptide to PPEP activity, but such
peptides are poor substrates. The anionic residue D in the
a2 position is not tolerated by PPEP activity.
Five farnesylated radiolabeled tetrapeptides,
Ac-C(F)FM[3H]L,
Ac-C(F)LI[3H]L,
Ac-C(F)LL[3H]L, Ac-C(F)LM[3H]L, and
Ac-C(F)VI[3H]L were prepared, and PPEP activity
kinetic studies revealed that they
are good substrates and show comparable KM
values (2.2−13.5 μM). Ac-C(F)RL[3H]S
is a poor substrate.
The reported peptide binding preferences of PPEP activity should
be useful in designing compounds that
block the C-terminal proteolysis of prenylated proteins.
Nonprenylated peptides do not bind to PPEP
activity, and replacement of the farnesyl group with an
n-pentadecyl group modestly reduces binding.
Peptide−membrane partitioning studies were used together with
theoretical arguments to fully understand
the substrate specificity of PPEP activity toward these
compounds
