The Ways I\u27m a Fraud: Essays on Imposter Syndrome in Identity

In this day and age, great progress is being made in acceptance of all kinds of alternative identities. With growing numbers of identities, imposter syndrome about identity rises with people feeling as though they don\u27t fully belong to an identity group. What does it even mean to be a member of an identity group, and why do I, and many others, feel like an imposter in them? I offer two essays discussing the matter. The first covers alcoholism and how not committing fully to sobriety feels like it excludes my using the identity of alcoholic or addict. The other on being LGBTQIA+ tackles feeling like the \u27+\u27 in that group and what it means to be uncertain about queerness, resulting in feeling like an imposter. Through essays that, at times, feel more like rants, I journey to understand my own imposter syndrome while simultaneously delving into larger discussions of identity and labels and their place in the modern world

In The Heart Of Kentucky : Fox Trot Song

https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mmb-vp/1864/thumbnail.jp

Resolving Conflict Together: The Understanding-Based Model of Mediation

The following excerpt is from a book in progress-tentatively titled, Resolving Conflict Together: The Understanding-Based Model of Mediation-that is planned to be published in 2007 by the American Bar Association. In this book, we seek to set out the approach to mediation that we have been developing through our work with the Center for Mediation in Law (the Center). We have termed this approach the Understanding-Based Model of mediation. The book develops twelve mediation cases, in which Gary served as mediator and which, with commentary, serve to transmit our approach to mediation. Each case focuses on a different aspect of the mediation process. The excerpt here, which we call The Publishing Case, focuses on the role of law in mediation

The Optimisation of Bayesian Classifier in Predictive Spatial Modelling for Secondary Mineral Deposits

This paper discusses the general concept of Bayesian Network classifier and the optimisation of a predictive spatial model using Naive Bayes (NB) on secondary mineral deposit data. A different NB modelling approaches to mineral distribution data was used to predict the occurrence of a particular mineral deposit in a given area, which include; predictive attributes sub-selection, normalised attributes selection, NB dependent attributes and the strictness to NB model assumptions of attributes independence selection. The performance of the model was determined by selecting a model with the best predictive accuracy. The NB classifier that violates assumptions of attributes independence was used to compare with other forms of NB. The aim is to improve the general performance of the model through the best selection of predictive attribute data. The paper elaborates the workings of a Bayesian Network learning model, the concept of NB and its application to predicting mineral deposit potentials. The result of the optimised NB model based on predictive accuracies and the Receivr Operating Characteristics (ROC) value is also determined

What Makes You So Sure? Dogmatism, Fundamentalism, Analytic Thinking, Perspective Taking and Moral Concern in the Religious and Nonreligious

Better understanding the psychological factors related to certainty in one’s beliefs (i.e., dogmatism) has important consequences for both individuals and social groups. Generally, beliefs can find support from at least two different routes of information processing: social/moral considerations or analytic/empirical reasoning. Here, we investigate how these two psychological constructs relate to dogmatism in two groups of individuals who preferentially draw on the former or latter sort of information when forming beliefs about the world- religious and non religious individuals. Across two studies and their pooled analysis, we provide evidence that although dogmatism is negatively related to analytic reasoning in both groups of individuals, it shares a divergent relationship with measures of moral concern depending on whether one identifies as religious or not. Study 1 showed that increasing levels of dogmatism were positively related to prosocial intentions among the religious and negatively related to empathic concern among the nonreligious. Study 2 replicated and extended these results by showing that perspective taking is negatively related to dogmatism in both groups, an effect which is particularly robust among the nonreligious. Study 2 also showed that religious fundamentalism was positively related to measures of moral concern among the religious. Because the current studies used a content neutral measure to assess dogmatic certainty in one’s beliefs, they have the potential to inform practices for most effectively communicating with and persuading religious and nonreligious individuals to change maladaptive behavior, even when the mode of discourse is unrelated to religious belief