Nicaragua: logros y desafíos de la izquierda

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Schematic representation of the mirror mating design. As an example, the figure shows the pedigree of two Epi+ and Epi− birds from the G3 generation (9E− and 9E+) starting from their four founding single-pair matings (SPM) at generation G0. Lines of descent are identified with a different color from each founding SPM. Transmission arrows have solid lines for Epi+ birds and broken ones for Epi− birds. Homologous birds 9E+ and 9E− have mirror-like, parallel, pedigrees with the same expected genetic contribution from their founders. In this study, matings were designed so that only homologous birds were obtained in the G3 generation. The 8E+ and 8E− parents are produced the same way as the 7E+ and 7E−, from 4 different founder pairs

Number of analyzed RNA and DNA sequences in the study (after alignment to Galgal4).

<p>Number of analyzed RNA and DNA sequences in the study (after alignment to Galgal4).</p

RDD candidates after filtering steps.

<p>In bold, candidates tested for validation</p><p>RDD candidates after filtering steps.</p

Number of RDD candidates obtained after each filter.

<p>Number of RDD candidates obtained after each filter.</p

P-values from an analysis of variance for tissue and stage effect on editing frequency.

<p>Positions of candidates tested on multiple tissues by pyrosequencing are shown.</p><p>P-values from an analysis of variance for tissue and stage effect on editing frequency.</p

Additional file 2: of Mapping of leptin and its syntenic genes to chicken chromosome 1p

Characterization of RBM28. Figure S1. cDNA and predicted protein sequences of RBM28. Table S2. RBM28 Exons in chicken alligator and human. (XLSX 13 kb

Proportion of base changes of RDD candidates before /after filters.

<p>Proportion of base changes of RDD candidates before /after filters.</p

Distribution of RDD sites in genomic features.

<p>Distribution of RDD sites in genomic features.</p

<i>In silico</i> prediction of functional consequence on edited variants.

<p>* Computed using Cravat 3.0, functional score close to 1 means functional effect (score p-value)</p><p><i>In silico</i> prediction of functional consequence on edited variants.</p

Addition of the microchromosome GGA25 to the chicken genome sequence assembly through radiation hybrid and genetic mapping-2

Ochromosomes of similar size as the one hybridised by the BAC clone from E26C13 are shown: (a): BAC clones for GGA19, GGA21, GGA22, GGA23 (red) and BAC clone bw90F5 for E26C13 (green). (b): BAC clones for GGA24, GGA26, GGA27, GGA28 (red) and BAC clone bw90F5 for E26C13 (green).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Addition of the microchromosome GGA25 to the chicken genome sequence assembly through radiation hybrid and genetic mapping"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/129</p><p>BMC Genomics 2008;9():129-129.</p><p>Published online 17 Mar 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2275740.</p><p></p