Withdrawal and Re-treatment with Filgotinib in Ulcerative Colitis: Post Hoc Analyses of the Phase 2b/3 SELECTION and SELECTIONLTE Studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis may be discontinued for multiple reasons. This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of re-treatment with filgotinib, an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, in the phase 2b/3 SELECTION trial and its long-term extension [LTE] study in ulcerative colitis. METHODS Partial Mayo Clinic Score [pMCS] response and remission were evaluated in patients who received induction with filgotinib 200 mg [FIL200] or 100 mg [FIL100], were randomized to treatment withdrawal [placebo] during maintenance, and following disease worsening, were re-treated with open-label FIL200 in the LTE study. Factors were evaluated for association with pMCS remission at LTE week 12, and safety outcomes were reported. RESULTS Analyses included 86 patients [FIL200: n = 51; FIL100: n = 35]. Median time to disease worsening following treatment withdrawal was 15.1 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.1-18.7) for FIL200-induced patients and 9.6 weeks [95% CI: 6.3-12.0] for FIL100-induced patients. Three-quarters [75%] of patients achieved a pMCS response within 4-5 weeks of re-treatment in both groups. At LTE week 48, pMCS remission was achieved by 45.1% and 51.4% of FIL200- and FIL100-induced patients, respectively. Factors independently associated with restoring efficacy included no concomitant use of corticosteroids at induction baseline, and high albumin levels, pMCS remission and endoscopic score at maintenance baseline. No new safety signals were reported among re-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS In induction responders, re-treatment with FIL200 following temporary withdrawal from therapy restores response and/or remission in the majority of patients within 12 weeks. Re-treatment is well-tolerated

Treat to Target: A Proposed New Paradigm for the Management of Crohn's Disease.

International audience: The traditional management of CD, based on progressive, step-wise treatment intensification with re-evaluation of response according to symptoms, does not improve long-term outcomes of CD and places patients at risk for bowel damage. The introduction of novel therapies and the development of new approaches to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis led to better outcomes for patients. Prominent among these is a "treat to target" strategy that is based on regular assessment of disease activity using objective clinical and biological outcome measures and the subsequent adjustment of treatments. This approach is complementary to the concept of early intervention in high risk patients. This review evaluates current literature on this topic and proposes a definition for the concept treating to targets for Crohn's disease

Endoscopic, radiologic, and histologic healing with vedolizumab in patients with active Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective monoclonal antibody for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). We performed a prospective study of endoscopic, radiologic, and histologic healing in patients with CD who received vedolizumab therapy. METHODS: We performed a phase 3b, open-label, single-group study of 101 patients with at least 3 months of active CD (a CD Activity Index [CDAI] score of 220-450, a simple endoscopic score for CD [SES-CD] of 7 or more, 1 or more mucosal ulcerations [identified by endoscopy], and failure of conventional therapy) from March 2015 through December 2017. Among the patients enrolled, 54.5% had previous failure of 1 or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and 44.6% had severe endoscopic disease activity (SES-CD scores above 15) at baseline. Participants received vedolizumab (300 mg intravenously) at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks thereafter, for 26 weeks (primary study) or 52 weeks (substudy, 56 patients). The primary endpoint at week 26 was endoscopic remission (SES-CD score of 4 or less); other endpoints included endoscopic response (50% reduction in SES-CD), radiologic remission (magnetic resonance index of activity score below 7), and histologic response (modified global histologic disease activity score of 4 or less). RESULTS: At week 26, 11.9% of patients were in endoscopic remission (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.3-9.8); at week 52, 17.9% of the patients were in endoscopic remission (95% CI 8.9-30.4). Higher proportions of patients naïve to TNF antagonists achieved endoscopic remission than patients with TNF-antagonist-failure at weeks 26 and 52. Higher proportion of patients with moderate CD (SES-CD scores, 7-15) achieved endoscopic remission at weeks 26 and 52 than patients with severe CD (SES-CD scores above 15). The proportion of patients with complete mucosal healing increased over time, with greater rates of healing in the colon than in the ileum. Remission was detected by magnetic resonance enterography in 21.9% of patients at week 26 (95% CI 9.3-40.0) and in 38.1% at week 52 (95% CI 18.1-61.6). At week 26, 24.4% of patients had a histologic response in the colon (95% CI 15.3-35.4) and 28.3% of patients had a histologic response in the ileum (95% CI 17.5-41.4). At week 52, 20.5% of patients had a histologic response in the colon (95% CI 9.8-35.3) and 34.3% of patients had a histologic response in the ileum (95% CI 19.1-52.2). There were no notable safety issues, including worsening of extraintestinal manifestations. CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 3b trial, we found that 26 and 52 weeks of treatment with vedolizumab (300 mg, at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks thereafter) induces endoscopic, radiologic, and histologic healing in patients with moderately to severely active CD. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02425111. ispartof: GASTROENTEROLOGY vol:157 issue:4 pages:1007-+ ispartof: location:United States status: publishe

Medical Management Following Surgical Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Evidence from Cochrane Reviews

The Cochrane Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Group presented a symposium at Digestive Diseases Week 2019 entitled “Medical Management Following Surgical Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Evidence from Cochrane Reviews”. This article summarizes the data presented at this symposium

tofacitinib treatment is associated with modest and reversible increases in serum lipids in patients with ulcerative colitis

Background & Aims Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We analyzed inflammation, lipid concentrations, and incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACEs) in patients who received tofacitinib in worldwide studies. Methods We collected data from 1157 patients who participated in 3 8-week induction studies (1 phase-2 study and 2 phase-3 studies; patients received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily or placebo), a 52-week phase-3 maintenance study of responders (patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or placebo), and an ongoing long-term extension study of patients who did and did not respond to induction or maintenance therapy (patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily). Lipid concentrations were assessed from induction baseline to week 61 (week 52 of maintenance therapy). We calculated MACE incidence rates (patients with ≥1 event per 100 patient-years of exposure) and Reynolds risk score (RRS; a composite score used to determine CV risk) for patients given tofacitinib vs placebo. Results The mean RRS was P Conclusions In an analysis of data from 5 trials of patients with UC who received tofacitinib, we found reversible increases in lipids with treatment and inverse correlations with reduced levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. We did not find clinically meaningful changes in lipid ratios or RRS. MACEs were infrequent and not dose-related. Clinical trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov : A3921063 ( NCT00787202 ); OCTAVE Induction 1 ( NCT01465763 ); OCTAVE Induction 2 ( NCT01458951 ); OCTAVE Sustain ( NCT01458574 ); OCTAVE Open ( NCT01470612

Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Used in Observational Studies of Adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND Over the last 20 years, diverse outcome measures have been used to evaluate the effectiveness of therapies for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This systematic review aims to identify the readouts used in observational studies of topical corticosteroids, diet, and dilation in adult EoE patients. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and Embase for prospective and retrospective studies (cohorts/case series, randomized open-label, and case-control) evaluating the use of diets, dilation, and topical corticosteroids in adults with EoE. Two authors independently assessed the articles and extracted information about histologic, endoscopic, and patient-reported outcomes and tools used to assess treatment effects. RESULTS We included 69 studies that met inclusion criteria. EoE-associated endoscopic findings (assessed either as absence/presence or using Endoscopic Reference Score) were evaluated in 24/35, 11/17, and 9/17 studies of topical corticosteroids, diet, and dilation, respectively. Esophageal eosinophil density was recorded in 32/35, 17/17, and 11/17 studies of topical corticosteroids, diet, and dilation, respectively. Patient-reported outcomes were not uniformly used (only in 14, 8, and 3 studies of topical corticosteroids, diet, and dilation, respectively), and most tools were not validated for use in adults with EoE. CONCLUSIONS Despite the lack of an agreed set of core outcomes that should be recorded and reported in studies in adult EoE patients, endoscopic EoE-associated findings and esophageal eosinophil density are commonly used to assess disease activity in observational studies. Standardization of outcomes and data supporting the use of outcomes are needed to facilitate interpretation of evidence, its synthesis, and comparisons of interventions in meta-analyses of therapeutic trials in adults with EoE

Rapid and Sustained Symptom Relief in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Treated With Filgotinib: Data From the Phase 2b/3 SELECTION Trial

INTRODUCTION Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) regard rapid onset of action among the most important aspects of their treatment. We used the partial Mayo Clinic Score (pMCS) and component patient-reported subscores to assess the rapidity and sustainability of response to filgotinib, a once-daily, oral Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, in adults with moderately to severely active UC in the phase 2b/3 SELECTION trial. The association between early symptomatic improvements and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes was also assessed. METHODS In these post hoc analyses of the double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled 58-week SELECTION trial (NCT02914522), rectal bleeding and stool frequency diary data on days 1-15 and pMCS remission and response at multiple time points including weeks 10 and 58 were evaluated. HRQoL was assessed using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire at weeks 10 and 58. RESULTS Filgotinib 200 mg relative to placebo improved rectal bleeding and stool frequency within 7 days ( P < 0.05). By week 2, greater proportions of filgotinib 200 mg-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved pMCS remission (biologic-naive, 15.1% vs 8.0%, P = 0.0410; biologic-experienced, 10.3% vs 4.2%, P = 0.0274). A similar treatment effect was observed at week 58 ( P < 0.0001). Day 7 rectal bleeding and stool frequency subscores were associated with the Mayo Clinic Score response at weeks 10 and 58. Patients in pMCS remission at weeks 10 and 58 had greater improvements in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score than those not in pMCS remission. DISCUSSION Filgotinib 200 mg daily resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in both UC symptoms and HRQoL

Reliability and Initial Validation of the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity

Background & AimsWe studied the reliability of the previously described Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) and validated it with an independent cohort of investigators.MethodsWe created a new library of 57 videos of flexible sigmoidoscopy and stratified them based on disease severity. Twenty-five investigators were each randomly assigned to assess 28 videos (which included 4 duplicates to assess intraobserver reliability). Investigators were blinded to clinical details except for 2 of 4 duplicated videos (to assess the impact of knowledge of symptoms on assessment). Three descriptors (“vascular pattern”, “bleeding”, and “erosions and ulcers”) comprising the UCEIS were scored with a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess overall severity. Intrainvestigator and interinvestigator agreement was characterized by κ statistical analysis; reliability ratios were used to compare VAS and UCEIS scores.ResultsThere was a high level of correlation between UCEIS scores and overall assessment of severity (correlation coefficient, 0.93). Internal consistency (Cronbach α analysis) was 0.86. Intrainvestigator and interinvestigator reliability ratios for UCEIS scores were 0.96 and 0.88, respectively. Intrainvestigator agreement in determination of the UCEIS score was good (κ = 0.72), with individual descriptors ranging from a κ of 0.47 (for bleeding) to 0.87 (for vascular pattern). Interinvestigator agreement in determination of UCEIS scores was moderate (κ = 0.50), with descriptors ranging from a κ of 0.48 (for bleeding) to 0.54 (for vascular pattern). Intrainvestigator variability in determining UCEIS scores did not change appreciably when a video was presented with clinical details.ConclusionsThe UCEIS and its components show satisfactory intrainvestigator and interinvestigator reliability. Among investigators, the UCEIS accounted for a median of 86% of the variability in evaluation of overall severity on the VAS when assessing the endoscopic severity of UC and was unaffected by knowledge of clinical details

The challenge of indication extrapolation for infliximab biosimilars

AbstractA biosimilar is intended to be highly similar to a reference biologic such that any differences in quality attributes (i.e., molecular characteristics) do not affect safety or efficacy. Achieving this benchmark for biologics, especially large glycoproteins such as monoclonal antibodies, is challenging given their complex structure and manufacturing. Regulatory guidance on biosimilars issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada and European Medicines Agency indicates that, in addition to a demonstration of a high degree of similarity in quality attributes, a reduced number of nonclinical and clinical comparative studies can be sufficient for approval. Following a tiered approach, clinical studies are required to address concerns about possible clinically significant differences that remain after laboratory and nonclinical evaluations. Consequently, a critical question arises: can clinical studies that satisfy concerns regarding safety and efficacy in one condition support “indication extrapolation” to other conditions? This question will be addressed by reviewing the case of a biosimilar to infliximab that was approved recently in South Korea, Europe, and Canada for multiple indications through extrapolation. The principles discussed should also apply to biosimilars of other monoclonal antibodies that are approved to treat multiple distinct conditions

Association Between Response to Etrolizumab and Expression of Integrin αE and Granzyme A in Colon Biopsies of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Background & AimsEtrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against the β7 integrin subunit that has shown efficacy vs placebo in patients with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients with colon tissues that expressed high levels of the integrin αE gene (ITGAE) appeared to have the best response. We compared differences in colonic expression of ITGAE and other genes between patients who achieved clinical remission with etrolizumab vs those who did.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of data collected from 110 patients with UC who participated in a phase 2 placebo-controlled trial of etrolizumab, as well as from 21 patients with UC or without inflammatory bowel disease (controls) enrolled in an observational study at a separate site. Colon biopsies were collected from patients in both studies and analyzed by immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiling. Mononuclear cells were isolated and analyzed by flow cytometry. We identified biomarkers associated with response to etrolizumab. In the placebo-controlled trial, clinical remission was defined as total Mayo Clinic Score ≤2, with no individual subscore >1, and mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic score ≤1.ResultsColon tissues collected at baseline from patients who had a clinical response to etrolizumab expressed higher levels of T-cell−associated genes than patients who did not respond (P < .05). Colonic CD4+ integrin αE+ cells from patients with UC expressed higher levels of granzyme A messenger RNA (GZMA mRNA) than CD4+ αE− cells (P < .0001); granzyme A and integrin αE protein were detected in the same cells. Of patients receiving 100 mg etrolizumab, a higher proportion of those with high levels of GZMA mRNA (41%) or ITGAE mRNA (38%) than those with low levels of GZMA (6%) or ITGAE mRNA (13%) achieved clinical remission (P < .05) and mucosal healing (41% GZMAhigh vs 19% GZMAlow and 44% ITGAEhigh vs 19% ITGAElow). Compared with ITGAElow and GZMAlow patients, patients with ITGAEhigh and GZMAhigh had higher baseline numbers of epithelial crypt-associated integrin αE+ cells (P < .01 for both), but a smaller number of crypt-associated integrin αE+ cells after etrolizumab treatment (P < .05 for both). After 10 weeks of etrolizumab treatment, expression of genes associated with T-cell activation and genes encoding inflammatory cytokines decreased by 40%−80% from baseline (P < .05) in patients with colon tissues expressing high levels of GZMA at baseline.ConclusionsLevels of GZMA and ITGAE mRNAs in colon tissues can identify patients with UC who are most likely to benefit from etrolizumab; expression levels decrease with etrolizumab administration in biomarkerhigh patients. Larger, prospective studies of markers are needed to assess their clinical value