Real-time PCR detection of Human Herpesvirus 1-5 in patients lacking clinical signs of a viral CNS infection

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Infections of the central nervous system (CNS) with herpes- or enterovirus can be self-limiting and benign, but occasionally result in severe and fatal disease. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has revolutionized the diagnostics of viral pathogens, and by multiple displacement amplification (MDA) prior to real-time PCR the sensitivity might be further enhanced. The aim of this study was to investigate if herpes- or enterovirus can be detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients without symptoms.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 373 patients lacking typical symptoms of viral CNS infection were analysed by real-time PCR targeting herpesviruses or enteroviruses with or without prior MDA.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In total, virus was detected in 17 patients (4%). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was most commonly detected, in general from patients with other conditions (e.g. infections, cerebral hemorrhage). MDA satisfactorily amplified viral DNA in the absence of human nucleic acids, but showed poor amplification capacity for viral DNA in CSF samples, and did not increase the sensitivity for herpes virus-detection with our methodology.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Viral pathogens are rarely detected in CSF from patients without signs of CNS infection, supporting the view that real-time PCR is a highly specific method to detect symptomatic CNS-infection caused by these viruses. However, EBV may be subclinically reactivated due to other pathological conditions in the CNS.</p

Nasal vaccination using novel mucosal adjuvants : with main focus on influenza A virus

Influenza viruses have sporadically caused pandemics during the last century, with the most severe occurring in 1918 when the “Spanish flu”, an A/H1N1 influenza virus, passed around the globe killing about 20-100 million people. Today 250 000-500 000 deaths occur annually due to influenza virus or secondary infection after influenza, e.g. pneumonia. Influenza viruses cause severe infections in susceptible age groups like children and elderly and in individuals with impaired immune response due to other medical conditions. The best way to prevent an influenza epidemic is by vaccination. Since the 1950´s we have vaccines against seasonal flu, but vaccine efficacy is not 100 % and there is a need to develop better and more effective vaccines, especially for the risk groups. Since the virus enters the host through the nasal cavity, nasal vaccination is a good approach. By stimulating a mucosal immune response already in the nasal cavity, the goal with nasal vaccination is to stop the virus before it enters the host. Nasal vaccination also reduces the risk of transmission of blood-borne diseases, and is less painful and easier to administer, compared to injectable vaccines. In order to be able to use less immunogenic antigens, like split and subunit antigens, as nasal vaccine components, an adjuvant is needed to enhance the immune response. At the moment there is no licensed mucosal adjuvant for human use. Several studies are ongoing, but it is a complicated and long way to reach the market. In this thesis nasal vaccination with influenza antigen together with the mucosal adjuvant Endocine™ and other mucosal adjuvants has been evaluated. The Endocine™ adjuvant has been shown to be safe and well tolerated in clinical trials. Depending on the pathogen of interest, different approaches are necessary. For HIV, DNA-vaccination has been evaluated together with a plasmid encoding Salmonella typhimurium flagellin C and the mucosal adjuvant N3. The results found in paper I-IV show that by adding adjuvant to the antigen enhances the protective immune response towards the antigen. Enhanced systemic, mucosal and cell-mediated immunity were observed. Hopefully in the future these adjuvants evaluated in this thesis, will be used in vaccines for humans

Source Control of Gram-Negative Bacteria Using Self-Disinfecting Sinks in a Swedish Burn Centre

Several retrospective studies have identified hospital sinks as reservoirs of Gram-negative bacteria. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the bacterial transmission from sinks to patients and if self-disinfecting sinks could reduce this risk. Samples were collected weekly from sinks (self-disinfecting, treated with boiling water, not treated) and patients in the Burn Centre at Linkoping University Hospital, Sweden. The antibiotic susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates was tested, and eight randomly chosen patient isolates and their connected sink isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS). Of 489 sink samples, 232 (47%) showed growth. The most frequent findings were Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 130), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 128), and Acinetobacter spp. (n = 55). Bacterial growth was observed in 20% of the samplings from the self-disinfecting sinks and in 57% from the sinks treated with boiling water (p = 0.0029). WGS recognized one transmission of Escherichia coli sampled from an untreated sink to a patient admitted to the same room. In conclusion, the results showed that sinks can serve as reservoirs of Gram-negative bacteria and that self-disinfecting sinks can reduce the transmission risk. Installing self-disinfecting sinks in intensive care units is an important measure in preventing nosocomial infection among critically ill patients

Source Control of Gram-Negative Bacteria Using Self-Disinfecting Sinks in a Swedish Burn Centre

Several retrospective studies have identified hospital sinks as reservoirs of Gram-negative bacteria. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the bacterial transmission from sinks to patients and if self-disinfecting sinks could reduce this risk. Samples were collected weekly from sinks (self-disinfecting, treated with boiling water, not treated) and patients in the Burn Centre at Linkoping University Hospital, Sweden. The antibiotic susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates was tested, and eight randomly chosen patient isolates and their connected sink isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS). Of 489 sink samples, 232 (47%) showed growth. The most frequent findings were Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 130), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 128), and Acinetobacter spp. (n = 55). Bacterial growth was observed in 20% of the samplings from the self-disinfecting sinks and in 57% from the sinks treated with boiling water (p = 0.0029). WGS recognized one transmission of Escherichia coli sampled from an untreated sink to a patient admitted to the same room. In conclusion, the results showed that sinks can serve as reservoirs of Gram-negative bacteria and that self-disinfecting sinks can reduce the transmission risk. Installing self-disinfecting sinks in intensive care units is an important measure in preventing nosocomial infection among critically ill patients

The intranasal adjuvant Endocine((TM)) enhances both systemic and mucosal immune responses in aged mice immunized with influenza antigen

Despite availability of annual influenza vaccines, influenza causes significant morbidity and mortality in the elderly. This is at least in part a result of immunosenescence; the age-dependent decrease in immunological competence that results in greater susceptibility to infections and reduced responses to vaccination. To improve protective immune responses in this age group, new vaccines strategies, such as the use of adjuvants, are needed. Here, we evaluated the mucosal vaccine adjuvant Endocine(TM), formulated with split influenza antigen and administered intranasally in aged (20-month old) mice. Humoral immune responses were assessed and compared to unadjuvanted intranasal and subcutaneous vaccines. We show that formulation with Endocine(TM) significantly enhances hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers, as well as serum IgG and mucosal IgA antibody titers, compared to both types of unadjuvanted vaccines. Thus, our results indicate that intranasal vaccination with Endocine(TM) is a possible approach for the development of mucosal influenza vaccines for the elderly

Endocine™, N3OA and N3OASq; Three Mucosal Adjuvants That Enhance the Immune Response to Nasal Influenza Vaccination

Annual outbreaks of seasonal influenza are controlled or prevented through vaccination in many countries. The seasonal vaccines used are either inactivated, currently administered parenterally, or live-attenuated given intranasally. In this study three mucosal adjuvants were examined for the influence on the humoral (mucosal and systemic) and cellular influenza A-specific immune responses induced by a nasally administered vaccine. We investigated in detail how the anionic Endocine™ and the cationic adjuvants N3OA and N3OASq mixed with a split inactivated influenza vaccine induced influenza A-specific immune responses as compared to the vaccine alone after intranasal immunization. The study showed that nasal administration of a split virus vaccine together with Endocine™ or N3OA induced significantly higher humoral and cell-mediated immune responses than the non-adjuvanted vaccine. N3OASq only significantly increased the cell-mediated immune response. Furthermore, nasal administration of the influenza vaccine in combination with any of the adjuvants; Endocine™, N3OA or N3OASq, significantly enhanced the mucosal immunity against influenza HA protein. Thus the addition of these mucosal adjuvants leads to enhanced immunity in the most relevant tissues, the upper respiratory tract and the systemic circulation. Nasal influenza vaccination with an inactivated split vaccine can therefore provide an important mucosal immune response, which is often low or absent after traditional parenteral vaccination.Funding Agencies|Eurocine Vaccines||Vinnova Research funds||Halsofonden||</p

Endocine™, N3OA and N3OASq; Three Mucosal Adjuvants That Enhance the Immune Response to Nasal Influenza Vaccination

Annual outbreaks of seasonal influenza are controlled or prevented through vaccination in many countries. The seasonal vaccines used are either inactivated, currently administered parenterally, or live-attenuated given intranasally. In this study three mucosal adjuvants were examined for the influence on the humoral (mucosal and systemic) and cellular influenza A-specific immune responses induced by a nasally administered vaccine. We investigated in detail how the anionic Endocine™ and the cationic adjuvants N3OA and N3OASq mixed with a split inactivated influenza vaccine induced influenza A-specific immune responses as compared to the vaccine alone after intranasal immunization. The study showed that nasal administration of a split virus vaccine together with Endocine™ or N3OA induced significantly higher humoral and cell-mediated immune responses than the non-adjuvanted vaccine. N3OASq only significantly increased the cell-mediated immune response. Furthermore, nasal administration of the influenza vaccine in combination with any of the adjuvants; Endocine™, N3OA or N3OASq, significantly enhanced the mucosal immunity against influenza HA protein. Thus the addition of these mucosal adjuvants leads to enhanced immunity in the most relevant tissues, the upper respiratory tract and the systemic circulation. Nasal influenza vaccination with an inactivated split vaccine can therefore provide an important mucosal immune response, which is often low or absent after traditional parenteral vaccination.Funding Agencies|Eurocine Vaccines||Vinnova Research funds||Halsofonden||</p

Comparison of the mucosal adjuvant Endocine™ with two well-known adjuvants : cholera toxin and alum

To enable efficient mucosal vaccination with split or subunit antigens, an adjuvant is often needed. To date, no mucosal adjuvants are approved for human use, however, there are a variety of mucosal adjuvants in development, including the liposome-based adjuvant Endocine™. The aim of this study was to evaluate split influenza antigens together with Endocine™ and in order to assess the potency of Endocine™, the induction of humoral immune responses were compared to those following influenza vaccination with cholera toxin (CT) or aluminum salt (alum). We show that Endocine™ significantly enhances influenza-specific immune responses in intranasally immunized mice compared to nonadjuvanted vaccine. Furthermore, vaccines adjuvanted with Endocine™ evoked comparable serum IgG and virus neutralizing (VN) antibody titers as nasal vaccines adjuvanted with CT. Compared to parenteral vaccination with alum, Endocine™ triggered significantly higher mucosal and serum IgA titers, and similar VN titers. Taken together, these results support further development of Endocine™ as a mucosal adjuvant and as part of a nasal influenza vaccine candidate

Реконструкция системы электроснабжения ОАО «Светлогорский завод ЖБИиК» в связя с заменой устаревшего электрооборудования

To enable efficient mucosal vaccination with split or subunit antigens, an adjuvant is often needed. To date, no mucosal adjuvants are approved for human use, however, there are a variety of mucosal adjuvants in development, including the liposome-based adjuvant Endocine™. The aim of this study was to evaluate split influenza antigens together with Endocine™ and in order to assess the potency of Endocine™, the induction of humoral immune responses were compared to those following influenza vaccination with cholera toxin (CT) or aluminum salt (alum). We show that Endocine™ significantly enhances influenza-specific immune responses in intranasally immunized mice compared to nonadjuvanted vaccine. Furthermore, vaccines adjuvanted with Endocine™ evoked comparable serum IgG and virus neutralizing (VN) antibody titers as nasal vaccines adjuvanted with CT. Compared to parenteral vaccination with alum, Endocine™ triggered significantly higher mucosal and serum IgA titers, and similar VN titers. Taken together, these results support further development of Endocine™ as a mucosal adjuvant and as part of a nasal influenza vaccine candidate

Replication in Human Intestinal Enteroids of Infectious Norovirus from Vomit Samples

A typical clinical symptom of human norovirus infection is projectile vomiting. Although norovirus RNA and viral particles have been detected in vomitus, infectivity has not yet been reported. We detected replication-competent norovirus in 25% of vomit samples with a 13-fold to 714-fold increase in genomic equivalents, confirming infectious norovirus.Funding Agencies|Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Research CouncilEuropean Commission [3R 2017-01479]; ALF Grants, Region Ostergotland [LIO-934451]</p