31 research outputs found

    SPECIAL ARTICLES Best Practices for Survey Research Reports Revisited: Implications of Target Population, Probability Sampling, and Response Rate

    Get PDF
    Several papers have been published recently in the Journal addressing ''best practices'' for survey research manuscripts. This paper explores in more detail the effects of the target population size on sample size determination, probability sampling versus census approaches, and response rates and the relationship to potential nonresponse bias. Survey research is a complex methodology requiring expertise in the planning, execution, and analytic stages

    Curricular Evaluation Using Self-Efficacy Measurements

    Get PDF
    Self-efficacy measurements have been used in other health-related professions such as nursing and occupational therapy to assess proficiency in disciplinary areas but have not been used extensively in pharmacy education as a method of curricular evaluation. Self-efficacy is a measurement of an individual's confidence in his or her ability to perform a specific task to successful completion. The purpose of this study was to propose a methodology using self-efficacy measurements in curricular evaluation and assessment as well as to provide specific recommendations for potential uses in pharmacy education. The suggested methodology includes item generation, validation, administration, and correlation with behavior. A specific example is provided demonstrating the suggested methodology. Self-efficacy measurement could provide a potentially valuable methodologic framework for assessment and evaluation within pharmacy curricula. Self-efficacy measurements could be used in a wide range of applications

    Programmatic assessment of student experiences using a longitudinal survey

    No full text
    Objectives: The purpose of this study was to gather longitudinal data on a pharmacy class cohort concerning programmatic components as well as develop a profile of student experiences as they progress through the curriculum. Methods: The Class of 2006 (n = 67) completed a 2 page instrument at the conclusion of the first 3 professional years (PY) concerning hours spent in various activities, overall quality of various programmatic components, relationships with others in the college, and employment information. During senior week, a more extensive exit survey was administered. Results: At the conclusion of PY1, 56.5% of the class was working as a pharmacy intern. By PY3 this increased to 88.1% with a decrease to 65.7% in the final year. The hourly range of hours worked followed the same pattern. The rating of Dean¿s Office Staff and interactions with faculty members remained constant across all 4 years. In the final exit survey the 2 lowest rated program components were the quality of the interaction with assigned faculty advisor and the availability of professional electives. There was no difference across the professional years for the quality of relationships with staff or faculty; however, the mean rating of the quality of relationships with other students was higher for PY4 when compared to PY1. Conclusions: College faculty, administrators, and committees have used the information gathered from students in program assessment and enhancement efforts. Longitudinal data collection allows for tracking of changes and interventions

    Programmatic assessment of student experiences using a longitudinal survey

    No full text
    Objectives: The purpose of this study was to gather longitudinal data on a pharmacy class cohort concerning programmatic components as well as develop a profile of student experiences as they progress through the curriculum. Methods: The Class of 2006 (n = 67) completed a 2 page instrument at the conclusion of the first 3 professional years (PY) concerning hours spent in various activities, overall quality of various programmatic components, relationships with others in the college, and employment information. During senior week, a more extensive exit survey was administered. Results: At the conclusion of PY1, 56.5% of the class was working as a pharmacy intern. By PY3 this increased to 88.1% with a decrease to 65.7% in the final year. The hourly range of hours worked followed the same pattern. The rating of Dean¿s Office Staff and interactions with faculty members remained constant across all 4 years. In the final exit survey the 2 lowest rated program components were the quality of the interaction with assigned faculty advisor and the availability of professional electives. There was no difference across the professional years for the quality of relationships with staff or faculty; however, the mean rating of the quality of relationships with other students was higher for PY4 when compared to PY1. Conclusions: College faculty, administrators, and committees have used the information gathered from students in program assessment and enhancement efforts. Longitudinal data collection allows for tracking of changes and interventions

    Establishing the internal and external validity of experimental studies

    No full text
    corecore