Lalakenis/All Directions : A Journey of Truth and Unity

"The catalogue offers visual documentation of the belongings that were gathered together and displayed in the Gallery during the Lalakenis exhibition, along with images from the two journeys that culminated in copper-breaking ceremonies: Awalaskenis I (February 2013) beginning in Quatsino and ending in Victoria, BC and Awalaskenis II (July 2014) which saw Beau Dick and 21 companions setting out from UBC for Ottawa." -- Publisher's website

Conference on Best Practices for Managing \u3cem\u3eDaubert\u3c/em\u3e Questions

This article is a transcript of the Philip D. Reed Lecture Series Conference on Best Practices for Managing Daubert Questions, held on October 25, 2019, at Vanderbilt Law School under the sponsorship of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules. The transcript has been lightly edited and represents the panelists’ individual views only and in no way reflects those of their affiliated firms, organizations, law schools, or the judiciary

FUERA DEL CANON

El artículo comienza con una definición del canon y con una consideración sobre cómo se establece. Luego, habla de algunos escritores canónicos de Centro América, como Sergio Ramírez o Gioconda Belli. Después, se refieren a escritores “fuera del canon”: la poesía feminista, la generación “x”, el grupo de Marco Antonio Flores, la literatura escrita por mujeres, la escrita por indígenas, la literatura póstuma. Al final, trata de establecer características generales, estilo, temas y motivos

Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common ongoing health problem that places patients at risk of stroke. Whether and how a patient addresses this risk depends on each patient’s goals, context, and values. Consequently, leading cardiovascular societies recommend using shared decision making (SDM) to individualize antithrombotic treatment in patients with AF. The aim of this study is to assess the extent to which the Anticoagulation Choice conversation tool promotes high-quality SDM and influences anticoagulation uptake and adherence in patients with AF at risk of strokes. Methods This study protocol describes a multicenter, encounter-level, randomized trial to assess the effect of using the Anticoagulation Choice conversation tool in the clinical encounter, compared to usual care. The participating centers include an academic hospital system, a suburban community group practice, and an urban safety net hospital, all in Minnesota, USA. Patients with ongoing nonvalvular AF at risk of strokes (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 in men, or ≥ 2 in women) will be eligible for participation. We aim to include 999 patients and their clinicians. The primary outcome is the quality of SDM as perceived by participants, and as assessed by a post-encounter survey that ascertains (a) knowledge transfer, (b) concordance of the decision made, (c) quality of communication, and (d) satisfaction with the decision-making process. Recordings of encounters will be reviewed to assess the extent of patient involvement and how participants use the tool (fidelity). Anticoagulant use, choice of agent, and adherence will be drawn from patients’ medical and pharmacy records. Strokes and bleeding events will be drawn from patient records. Discussion This study will provide a valid and precise measure of the effect of the Anticoagulation Choice conversation tool on SDM quality and processes, and on the treatment choices and adherence to therapy among AF patients at risk of stroke. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02905032 . Registered on 9 September 2016

Conference on Best Practices for Managing \u3cem\u3eDaubert\u3c/em\u3e Questions

This article is a transcript of the Philip D. Reed Lecture Series Conference on Best Practices for Managing Daubert Questions, held on October 25, 2019, at Vanderbilt Law School under the sponsorship of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules. The transcript has been lightly edited and represents the panelists’ individual views only and in no way reflects those of their affiliated firms, organizations, law schools, or the judiciary

The Manatee [2009]

The Manatee is an annual literary journal run by the students of Southern New Hampshire University

Additional file 4: of Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

The Anticoagulation Choice conversation tool. This conversation tool is an online tool intended for use by a patient and clinician together in a clinical encounter in which they are discussing how to respond to the patient’s risk of stroke due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The tool is intended to provide a supportive structure and information that patient and clinician may draw on during clinical conversations in various settings e.g. primary care, emergency department, cardiology and other specialty practices. Details on the full developmental process of the ANTICOAGULATION CHOICE conversation tool is described elsewhere (Hargraves et al, The Lion and the Snake: Design in Support of Shared Decision Making in Atrial Fibrillation. Manuscript in preparation). (PDF 742 kb