Real-life study to assess effectiveness and safety of eculizumab in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in France: protocol for ECUP4, an observational study

BackgroundEculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the C5 complement protein, has been approved for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive (Ab+). The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of eculizumab in French adults with NMOSD and to describe patients' characteristics, disability, and quality of life using data collected in a real-world setting.MethodsThis is the protocol for ECUP4, an ongoing prospective, observational, non-comparative, multicenter study conducted in 32 reference centers in France. Eligible patients must also be enrolled in NOMADMUS, a nested cohort of the French national multiple sclerosis registry (OFSEP). The primary endpoint is the annualized relapse rate. Secondary endpoints include the long-term safety of eculizumab, as well as patients' characteristics, treatment outcomes, disability, pain, visual acuity, and quality of life. Visits and treatments follow routine clinical practice. The case report forms (CRF) comprise data recorded in the context of the NOMADMUS cohort, collected during routine visits. The inclusion period is planned for 3 years, with no limitation on the number of patients enrolled. The maximum follow-up duration will be 5.5 years.ConclusionThe efficacy and safety of eculizumab in patients with AQP4+ NMOSD have been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials that showed a significant reduction in the risk of relapse, with a safety profile consistent with other indications. This study will provide clinical and patient-reported evidence of the benefits of eculizumab, using data from a real-world setting in France.Trial registration numberThis study is registered at the French public repertory Health data Hub, N° F20211228123801. All information can be accessed at: https://www.health-data-hub.fr/

Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Yes

During the 20 past years, the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) has largely changed especially concerning therapeutical approach. Before 1996, treatments were restricted to corticosteroids for relapses, several symptomatic treatments and unselective immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate) with a low evidence of any efficacy. In the present review, we analyze the principal real-life cohorts of MS during several periods (before therapeutical modern area, first-generation treatment area and most recent period). Despite many methodological problems, we observe globally a delay of around 3-5 years between untreated cohorts and first-generation treatments for going to EDSS 6 which is probably the most robust score. This delay is clearly increase to at least 15 years with the most recent cohort treated first and second-line treatments confirming that early and more intensive treatment are necessary to have a long-term efficacy on disability progression and especially on severe disability represent by EDSS 6. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these tendencies and OFSEP observatory or MS base will probably provide us the possibility to conclude in a couple of years

CIDP: Current Treatments and Identification of Targets for Future Specific Therapeutic Intervention

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the peripheral nervous system. This clinically heterogeneous neurological disorder is closely related to Guillain–Barré syndrome and is considered the chronic counterpart of that acute disease. Currently available treatments are mostly empirical; they include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchange and chronic immunosuppressive agents, either alone or in combination. Recent advances in the understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms in CIDP have brought a number of novel ways of possible intervention for use in CIDP. This review summarizes selected pre-clinical and clinical findings, highlights the importance of using adapted animal models to evaluate the efficacy of novel treatments, and proposes the outlines of future directions to ameliorate the conditions of patients with CIDP

CIDP: Current Treatments and Identification of Targets for Future Specific Therapeutic Intervention

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the peripheral nervous system. This clinically heterogeneous neurological disorder is closely related to Guillain–Barré syndrome and is considered the chronic counterpart of that acute disease. Currently available treatments are mostly empirical; they include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchange and chronic immunosuppressive agents, either alone or in combination. Recent advances in the understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms in CIDP have brought a number of novel ways of possible intervention for use in CIDP. This review summarizes selected pre-clinical and clinical findings, highlights the importance of using adapted animal models to evaluate the efficacy of novel treatments, and proposes the outlines of future directions to ameliorate the conditions of patients with CIDP

False positivity of anti aquaporin-4 antibodies in natalizumab-treated patients.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) represent a differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Detection of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-Ab) is the strongest argument to confirm NMOSD. Diagnosing NMOSD is a major concern because specific MS disease modifying drugs can lead to neurological worsening. OBJECTIVE: To report the case of two natalizumab (NTZ) treated patients who presented a false positive result for AQP4-Ab. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of NTZ-treated patients who were tested positive for AQP4-Ab in our MS center. RESULTS: Two patients treated by NTZ presented a false positive result. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of potential technical issues in detecting AQP4-Ab in NTZ-treated patients leading to false positive results

Autobiographical memory and episodic future thinking in multiple sclerosis: neuropsychological rehabilitation and neuroimaging

International audienc

Impact of disease-modifying treatments on humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination: A mirror of the response after SARS-CoV-2 infection

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) according to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) and in comparison with the humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: We included 28 MS patients with serological results after COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna ARNm) and 61 MS patients with serological results after COVID-19 (COVID-19 group) among patients followed up at the MS Center of Strasbourg, France, between January and April 2021. The primary endpoint was the IgG index according to DMTs (anti-CD20 mAb, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor [S1PR] modulator and other treatments) and COVID-19 vaccine or COVID-19 groups. RESULTS: In the vaccinated MS patients, the median IgG index was lower in patients treated with anti-CD20 mAb and in patients treated with S1PR modulator compared to patients receiving other or no DMTs (4.80 [1.58-28.6], 16.5 [16.3-48.5], 1116 [434-1747] and 1272 [658-1886], respectively, P<0.001). Similar results were found for MS patients after COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MS and treated with S1PR modulators or anti-CD20 mAb had a reduced humoral response after COVID-19 vaccine

Mechanism of action of s1p receptor modulators in multiple sclerosis: The double requirement

International audienceThe ideal treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) would target both the neuroinflammatory component of the disease (peripheral and central) and its neurodegenerative component, via modulation of a ubiquitous and pleiotropic common target. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a product of sphingosine metabolism, regulates many biological functions (including cell proliferation and survival, cell migration, the immune response and cardiovascular function) via five subtypes of receptor. These receptors are expressed in all types of brain cells where they modulate a number of processes involved in neuronal plasticity, including myelination, neurogenesis and neuroprotection. This profile has aroused interest in modulation of S1P function as a therapeutic target in many brain diseases, particularly those in which the immune system plays a role in the development of brain lesions. Fingolimod, a S1P receptor modulator, exerts its beneficial effects in MS through its anti-inflammatory and anti-neurodegenerative effects. This review discusses recent evidence indicating that fingolimod may target both the inflammatory and neurodegenerative components of the disease process in MS

MSCopilot® BOOST : développement d’un module d’accompagnement et de gestion de la fatigue à destination des patients atteints de sclérose en plaques

National audienc