Time to broaden the eligibility criteria in paediatric oncology trials? An analysis of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma non-eligible to the EpSSG RMS2005 trial

Purpose: Clinical trials include a series of eligibility and exclusion criteria that define the study population to reduce inter-patient heterogeneity and increase safety. Little is known about children with oncological diseases excluded from trials because they do not satisfy these criteria. We analysed the eligibility criteria adopted in the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group RMS2005 study and the survival of non-eligible patients. Patients and methods: RMS2005 run from 10/2005–12/2016. Eligibility criteria were age ≤ 25 years; pathologically proven diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS); no evidence of metastases; no pre-treatment; no pre-existing conditions preventing treatment; no previous malignant tumours and an interval between diagnostic surgery and the start of treatment ≤ 8 weeks. Clinical characteristics, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analysed for eligible and non-eligible patients. Results: The 79 non-eligible patients (4.3% of registered patients) were older than eligible patients (p<0.0001), with RMS arising in favourable sites (p = 0.004) and completely resected at diagnosis (p<0.0001). PFS for non-eligible vs. eligible patients was 67.1% (95%CI 55.3–76.5) vs. 71.5% (95%CI 69.3–73.6) (p = 0.23) and OS 77.1% (95%CI 65.7–85.1) vs. 80.4% (95%CI 78.4–82.3) (p = 0.12), respectively. Patients with a delayed start of treatment or pre-treated had significantly better PFS than those with a pre-existing condition (p = 0.0004). Conclusion: non-eligible patients data should be systematically collected. This will be important to confirm that trial eligibility criteria for patients with RMS could be modified without jeopardising results and increasing study enrolment and generalisability of results

Outcome of Stage IV Completely Necrotic Wilms Tumour and Local Stage III Treated According to the SIOP 2001 Protocol

Objective: Wilms tumour (WT) patients with a localised completely necrotic nephroblastoma after preoperative chemotherapy are a favourable outcome group. Since the introduction of the SIOP 2001 protocol, the SIOP– Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP–RTSG) has omitted radiotherapy for such patients with low-risk, local stage III in an attempt to reduce treatment burden. However, for metastatic patients with local stage III, completely necrotic WT, the recommendations led to ambiguous use. The purpose of this descriptive study is to demonstrate the outcomes of patients with metastatic, completely necrotic and local stage III WT in relation to the application of radiotherapy or not. Methods and materials: all metastatic patients with local stage III, completely necrotic WT after 6 weeks of preoperative chemotherapy who were registered in the SIOP 2001 study were included in this analysis. The pattern of recurrence according to the usage of radiation treatment and 5 year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was analysed. Results: seven hundred and three metastatic WT patients were registered in the SIOP 2001 database. Of them, 47 patients had a completely necrotic, local stage III WT: 45 lung metastases (11 combined localisations), 1 liver/peritoneal, and 1 tumour thrombus in the renal vein and the inferior vena cava with bilateral pulmonary arterial embolism. Abdominal radiotherapy was administered in 29 patients (62%; 29 flank/abdominal irradiation and 9 combined with lung irradiation). Eighteen patients did not receive radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 6.6 years (range 1–151 months). Two of the 47 patients (4%) developed disease recurrence in the lung (one combined with abdominal relapse) and eventually died of the disease. Both patients had received abdominal radiotherapy, one of them combined with lung irradiation. Five-year EFS and OS were 95% and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: the outcome of patients with stage IV, local stage III, completely necrotic Wilms tumours is excellent. Our results suggest that abdominal irradiation in this patient category may not be of added value in first-line treatment, consistent with the current recommendation in the SIOP–RTSG 2016 UMBRELLA protocol

Management of the vertebrae as an organ at risk in paediatric radiotherapy clinical trials: Initial QUARTET experience

Irradiation of the vertebrae in prepubertal patients, if non-homogenous, can result in future growth deformities including kyphoscoliosis. Vertebral delineation and dosimetry were assessed for 101 paediatric cases reviewed within QUARTET-affiliated trials. Despite the availability of published consensus guidelines, a high variability in vertebral delineation was observed, with impact on dosimetry

Time to broaden the eligibility criteria in pediatric oncology trials? An analysis of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma non-eligible to the EpSSG RMS2005 trial

Purpose Clinical trials include a series of eligibility and exclusion criteria that define the study population to reduce inter-patient heterogeneity and increase safety. Little is known about children with oncological diseases excluded from trials because they do not satisfy these criteria. We analysed the eligibility criteria adopted in the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group RMS2005 study and the survival of non-eligible patients. Patients and Methods RMS2005 run from 10/2005 to 12/2016. Eligibility criteria were age ≤25 years; pathologically proven diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS); no evidence of metastases; no pre-treatment; no pre-existing conditions preventing treatment; no previous malignant tumours and an interval between diagnostic surgery and the start of treatment ≤8 weeks. Clinical characteristics, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analysed for eligible and non-eligible patients. Results The 79 non-eligible patients (4.3% of registered patients) were older than eligible patients (p&lt;0.0001), with RMS arising in favourable sites (p=0.004) and completely resected at diagnosis (p&lt;0.0001). PFS for non-eligible vs. eligible patients was 67.1% (95%CI 55.3-76.5) vs. 71.5% Journal Pre-proof (95%CI 69.3-73.6) (p=0.23) and OS 77.1% (95%CI 65.7-85.1) vs. 80.4% (95%CI 78.4-82.3) (p=0.12), respectively. Patients with a delayed start of treatment or pre-treated had significantly better PFS than those with a pre-existing condition (p=0.0004). Conclusion: non-eligible patients data should be systematically collected. This will be important to confirm that trial eligibility criteria for patients with RMS could be modified without jeopardizing results and increasing study enrolment and generalizability of results

Re-salvage MRI-guided Focal High-dose-rate Brachytherapy for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer recurrences are common, even with twenty-first-century primary prostate cancer treatment modalities. The most common salvage treatment is (delayed) hormonal therapy, which is often associated with serious side-effects. Due to the risk of significant toxicity, whole-gland targeted salvage treatments remain unpopular. Consequently, developments in focal therapies have arisen. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is a novel treatment aiming for minimal toxicity in recurrent prostate cancer patients. Repeating focal treatment could, therefore, be possible in case of post-salvage recurrence. We report the case of a 77-year-old man who underwent repeat focal HDR-BT

Rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma is a heterogeneous disease both in presentation and histology. Improvements in a multimodality therapy resulted in the improved overall survival for patients with a low‐risk and intermediate‐risk disease but not for patients with a metastatic disease. We reviewed and contrasted the North American and European practice patterns, though ultimately the principles of staging, surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are similar in both Children's Oncology Group and International Society of Paediatric Oncology treatment approaches. Efforts are underway to investigate improved local control rates in higher risk patients using radiation dose escalation strategies, and delayed primary excision in select cases. The prognostic significance of imaging‐based chemotherapy response, proton therapy, novel biomarkers, and targeted drugs will be determined in upcoming clinical trials

Rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma is a heterogeneous disease both in presentation and histology. Improvements in a multimodality therapy resulted in the improved overall survival for patients with a low-risk and intermediate-risk disease but not for patients with a metastatic disease. We reviewed and contrasted the North American and European practice patterns, though ultimately the principles of staging, surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are similar in both Children's Oncology Group and International Society of Paediatric Oncology treatment approaches. Efforts are underway to investigate improved local control rates in higher risk patients using radiation dose escalation strategies, and delayed primary excision in select cases. The prognostic significance of imaging-based chemotherapy response, proton therapy, novel biomarkers, and targeted drugs will be determined in upcoming clinical trials

Evaluation of boost irradiation in patients with intermediate-risk stage III Wilms tumour with positive lymph nodes only: Results from the SIOP-WT-2001 Registry

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of radiotherapy boost omission in patients with intermediate-risk, stage III Wilms tumours (WT) with positive lymph nodes (LN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients with intermediate-risk, stage III (LN positive) WT consecutively registered in the SIOP-WT-2001 study were included in this analysis. Endpoints were 5-year event-free survival (EFS), loco-regional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between June 2001 and May 2015, 2,569 patients with stage I to III WT after preoperative chemotherapy were registered in the SIOP-WT-2001 study. Five hundred and twenty-three (20%) had stage III disease, of which 113 patients had stage III due to positive LN only. Of those, 101 (89%) received radiotherapy, 36 of which (36%) received, apart from flank irradiation, a boost dose to the LN positive area. Four patients (4%) did not receive any adjuvant radiotherapy. In eight patients information on radiotherapy was not available. With a median follow-up of 71 months, no difference in 5-year EFS (84% vs. 83%, P = 0.77) and LRC (96% vs. 97%, P = 0.91) was observed between patients receiving a radiotherapy boost and those without boost, respectively. Five-year OS, including salvage therapy, was excellent (boost vs. no boost: 97% vs. 95%, P = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome data demonstrate that omission of the radiotherapy boost to the loco-regional positive lymph nodes in patients with intermediate-risk, stage III WT who receive preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative flank irradiation (14.4 Gy) can be considered a safe approach for future SIOP protocols.status: publishe

Quantification of renal and diaphragmatic interfractional motion in pediatric image-guided radiation therapy:A multicenter study

Background and purpose: To quantify renal and diaphragmatic interfractional motion in order to estimate systematic and random errors, and to investigate the correlation between interfractional motion and patient-specific factors. Material and methods: We used 527 retrospective abdominal-thoracic cone beam CT scans of 39 childhood cancer patients ( Results: Inter-patient organ motion varied widely, with the largest movements in the CC direction. Values of Sigma in LR, CC, and AP directions were 1.1, 3.8, 2.1 mm for the right, and 1.3, 3.0, 1.5 mm for the left kidney, respectively. The sigma in these three directions was 1.1, 3.1, 1.7 mm for the right, and 1.2, 2.9, 2.1 mm for the left kidney, respectively. For the diaphragm we estimated Sigma = 5.2 mm and sigma = 4.0 mm. No correlations were found between organ motion and height. Conclusions: The large inter-patient organ motion variations and the lack of correlation between motion and patient-related factors, suggest that individualized margin approaches might be required. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

AMORE treatment as salvage treatment in children and young adults with relapsed head-neck rhabdomyosarcoma

Background and purpose: Survival after relapse of head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) after prior external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is poor, since options for adequate local treatment are often lacking. In this study we describe our experience with salvage AMORE in patients with relapsed HNRMS after prior EBRT. Materials and methods: Patients with relapsed HNRMS after prior EBRT in which salvage AMORE treatment was considered feasible were analysed; this includes patients with parameningeal, head and neck non-parameningeal and orbital localization. AMORE treatment consisted of Ablative surgery, MOuld technique brachytherapy and surgical REconstruction. Results: In total 18 patients received salvage AMORE treatment; nine patients had relapsed parameningeal (PM) RMS, two patients had relapsed head and neck non-parameningeal RMS (HN-nonPM) and seven patients had relapsed orbital RMS. Local control rate was 67% and 5-year overall survival was 54% (95% confidence interval: 31–78%); 3/9 patients with PM RMS, 0/2 patients with HN-nonPM RMS and 6/7 patients with orbital RMS were alive after a median follow-up of 8.6 years. One patient with PM RMS survived more than 5 years after which he died from a secondary cancer. Six patients developed a local relapse (of which one patient also developed a distant metastasis) and two patients developed distant metastases. Conclusions: Salvage AMORE treatment is a feasible and effective local therapy approach even after prior EBRT. Since salvage AMORE treatment is sometimes the only curative option in patient with relapsed HNRMS, we encourage physicians to consider salvage AMORE treatment for patients with relapsed HNRMS after prior EBRT