185 research outputs found

    A consensus of playwriting theory

    Get PDF
    Call number: LD2668 .T4 1985 C87Master of Art

    A Middle Palaeolithic Site at Lynford Quarry, Mundford, Norfolk: Interim Statement

    Full text link

    FFPred 3: feature-based function prediction for all Gene Ontology domains

    Get PDF
    Predicting protein function has been a major goal of bioinformatics for several decades, and it has gained fresh momentum thanks to recent community-wide blind tests aimed at benchmarking available tools on a genomic scale. Sequence-based predictors, especially those performing homology-based transfers, remain the most popular but increasing understanding of their limitations has stimulated the development of complementary approaches, which mostly exploit machine learning. Here we present FFPred 3, which is intended for assigning Gene Ontology terms to human protein chains, when homology with characterized proteins can provide little aid. Predictions are made by scanning the input sequences against an array of Support Vector Machines (SVMs), each examining the relationship between protein function and biophysical attributes describing secondary structure, transmembrane helices, intrinsically disordered regions, signal peptides and other motifs. This update features a larger SVM library that extends its coverage to the cellular component sub-ontology for the first time, prompted by the establishment of a dedicated evaluation category within the Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated through benchmarking experiments, and its usefulness is illustrated by analysing the potential functional consequences of alternative splicing in human and their relationship to patterns of biological features

    MLCut : exploring Multi-Level Cuts in dendrograms for biological data

    Get PDF
    Choosing a single similarity threshold for cutting dendrograms is not sufficient for performing hierarchical clustering analysis of heterogeneous data sets. In addition, alternative automated or semi-automated methods that cut dendrograms in multiple levels make assumptions about the data in hand. In an attempt to help the user to find patterns in the data and resolve ambiguities in cluster assignments, we developed MLCut: a tool that provides visual support for exploring dendrograms of heterogeneous data sets in different levels of detail. The interactive exploration of the dendrogram is coordinated with a representation of the original data, shown as parallel coordinates. The tool supports three analysis steps. Firstly, a single-height similarity threshold can be applied using a dynamic slider to identify the main clusters. Secondly, a distinctiveness threshold can be applied using a second dynamic slider to identify “weak-edges” that indicate heterogeneity within clusters. Thirdly, the user can drill-down to further explore the dendrogram structure - always in relation to the original data - and cut the branches of the tree at multiple levels. Interactive drill-down is supported using mouse events such as hovering, pointing and clicking on elements of the dendrogram. Two prototypes of this tool have been developed in collaboration with a group of biologists for analysing their own data sets. We found that enabling the users to cut the tree at multiple levels, while viewing the effect in the original data, isa promising method for clustering which could lead to scientific discoveries.Postprin

    Once upon a time: Designing a narrative-inspired curriculum for a Postgraduate Certificate in Teaching in Higher Education

    Full text link
    Once upon a time, there was a group of old teachers (well, maybe not so old, thanks very much) whose job it was to help other people learn to teach. They had high satisfaction with their jobs (as everyone in HE seems to have nowadays) and they liked the new teachers they worked with. Most of the new teachers seemed to find the old teachers useful, and they went out into the world with good ideas about how to teach. But something was troubling the old teachers. Some of the new teachers were finding it difficult to use the reflecting pool to think about their teaching. Some of them were scared to look into the pool afraid of what they might see, while others preferred to copy how teaching was done around them and did not want to use the pool at all. The old teachers scratched their heads, and had meetings where they argued about different ideas, and eventually they had a solution: they would tell the new teachers lots of stories, about themselves and about teaching, and encourage the new teachers in turn to tell stories. They wrote a big book (well a modest Moodle book called the ‘Module Anthology’) about teaching, with a chapter devoted to each of the main aspects of teaching, and in each chapter they encouraged the new teachers to use the reflecting pool and to tell their own stories. Did they live happily ever after? We don’t know yet, but we’re starting to think that maybe they did..

    Rethinking Assessment? Research into the the affective impact of higher education grading

    Get PDF
    Assessment plays a central role in learning in higher education (HE), but often the impact of grading assessment on student motivation, behaviour and wellbeing is insufficiently considered in policy and practice. With the growing concern in the HE sector about student mental health, a consideration of the affective dimension of grading is timely. The discussion in this paper on the affective dimension of grading is based on research conducted during the pandemic on the no-detriment implementation of pass/fail assessment at the University of the Arts London (UAL). Qualitative research was undertaken with first-and second-year undergraduate students in the fields of creative arts, design and communication to investigate the effects of the switch from letter grading to pass/fail and student views on grading more generally. Our findings suggest that grading affects student stress, anxiety, learner identity, motivation, student self-expression, creativity, and peer relationships. In the light of our findings, we bring together discourses about assessment, grading and student wellbeing to consider the longer-term implications for assessment practices in a post-pandemic world

    Belonging through Assessment: Pipelines of Compassion

    Full text link
    This paper presents the QAA Collaborative Enhancement Project 2021 - Belonging through assessment: Pipelines of compassion. The project is a collaboration between University of the Arts London, Glasgow School of Art, and Leeds Arts University. The project began against the backdrop of pandemic and the team identified a shift in assessment practices across the three participating arts institutions and address social justice, belonging and inclusion through compassion. The project aims to: • Identify areas of enhancement in assessment policies and practices to promote student sense of belonging and tackle issues of social justice. • Link this relational work with attainment gap/awarding differentials agendas in the creative arts. • Develop collaborative, dialogic, polyvocal and affective resources for staff development across the HE sector. The three research strands: 1. Pass/fail grading 2. Whole self: trauma-informed policies 3. Feedback (compassion and emotional impact) Drawing on these strands, we share our research and resources to help universities reflect on their assessment policies and practices. We offer approaches to design these with compassion to meet students where they are at. Ultimately, these principles can be used to develop student belonging and more culturally responsive education in the creative arts
    • …
    corecore