542 research outputs found

    Introduction to the special issue: multiple jobholding in Europe

    Get PDF
    In a number of European countries there is a clear trend towards increased multiple jobholding. As things stand, however, little is known about the structure and the potential consequences of this increase, notably in terms of quality of work and social protection. This special issue focuses on contemporary forms of multiple jobholding in Europe. Have the structure, nature and dynamics of multiple jobholding changed over time? What are the roles of labour market flexibility, technological change and work fragmentation in the development of multiple jobholding? And do multiple jobholders benefit from similar and adequate employment terms, conditions and protections compared with single jobholders, or are they worse off as a consequence of their (fragmented) employment situation? What implications do these findings have for unions, policy-makers and the regulation of work? The collection of articles in this special issue adds to the literature on emerging forms of employment in the digital age and challenges for social protection, also in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. This introduction initiates a discussion of central debates on multiple jobholding and presents a synopsis of the articles in this issue

    Einleitung zur Themenausgabe: MehrfachbeschÀftigung in Europa

    Get PDF
    In einer Reihe europĂ€ischer LĂ€nder ist der eindeutige Trend zu beobachten, dass immer mehr Arbeitnehmer:innen einer MehrfachbeschĂ€ftigung nachgehen. Zum gegenwĂ€rtigen Zeitpunkt ist allerdings wenig ĂŒber die Struktur und die potenziellen Konsequenzen dieser Entwicklung besonders im Hinblick auf die QualitĂ€t der BeschĂ€ftigung und die soziale Absicherung der Betroffenen bekannt. Diese Ausgabe von Transfer befasst sich mit modernen Formen multipler ArbeitsverhĂ€ltnisse in Europa. Haben sich Struktur, Natur und Dynamik der MehrfachbeschĂ€ftigung im Laufe der Zeit verĂ€ndert? Welche Rollen spielen ein flexibler Arbeitsmarkt, der technologische Wandel und die Fragmentierung der Arbeit bei der Entwicklung multipler ArbeitsverhĂ€ltnisse? Profitieren MehrfachbeschĂ€ftigte von vergleichbaren und adĂ€quaten BeschĂ€ftigungsbedingungen, Arbeitsbedingungen und sozialer Absicherung im Vergleich zu BeschĂ€ftigten mit nur einem Job, oder sind sie infolge ihrer (fragmentierten) BeschĂ€ftigungssituation schlechter gestellt? Welche Konsequenzen ergeben sich daraus fĂŒr Gewerkschaften, politische EntscheidungstrĂ€ger und die Regulierung der Arbeit? Die BeitrĂ€ge dieser Themenausgabe von Transfer ergĂ€nzen die vorhandene Fachliteratur ĂŒber neue BeschĂ€ftigungsformen im digitalen Zeitalter und ĂŒber die damit verbundenen Herausforderungen fĂŒr den Sozialschutz auch vor dem Hintergrund der Covid-19-Pandemie. Diese EinfĂŒhrung soll die wichtigsten Auseinandersetzungen zum Thema MehrfachbeschĂ€ftigung skizzieren und prĂ€sentiert eine Zusammenfassung der Artikel dieser Ausgabe

    Planning and reporting of quality-of-life outcomes in cancer trials

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND Information about the impact of cancer treatments on patients' quality of life (QoL) is of paramount importance to patients and treating oncologists. Cancer trials that do not specify QoL as an outcome or fail to report collected QoL data, omit crucial information for decision making. To estimate the magnitude of these problems, we investigated how frequently QoL outcomes were specified in protocols of cancer trials and subsequently reported. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of RCT protocols approved by six research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003. We compared protocols to corresponding publications, which were identified through literature searches and investigator surveys. RESULTS Of the 173 cancer trials, 90 (52%) specified QoL outcomes in their protocol, 2 (1%) as primary and 88 (51%) as secondary outcome. Of the 173 trials, 35 (20%) reported QoL outcomes in a corresponding publication (4 modified from the protocol), 18 (10%) were published but failed to report QoL outcomes in the primary or a secondary publication, and 37 (21%) were not published at all. Of the 83 (48%) trials that did not specify QoL outcomes in their protocol, none subsequently reported QoL outcomes. Failure to report pre-specified QoL outcomes was not associated with industry sponsorship (versus non-industry), sample size, and multicentre (versus single centre) status but possibly with trial discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS About half of cancer trials specified QoL outcomes in their protocols. However, only 20% reported any QoL data in associated publications. Highly relevant information for decision making is often unavailable to patients, oncologists, and health policymaker

    Planning and reporting of quality-of-life outcomes in cancer trials

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND Information about the impact of cancer treatments on patients' quality of life (QoL) is of paramount importance to patients and treating oncologists. Cancer trials that do not specify QoL as an outcome or fail to report collected QoL data, omit crucial information for decision making. To estimate the magnitude of these problems, we investigated how frequently QoL outcomes were specified in protocols of cancer trials and subsequently reported. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of RCT protocols approved by six research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003. We compared protocols to corresponding publications, which were identified through literature searches and investigator surveys. RESULTS Of the 173 cancer trials, 90 (52%) specified QoL outcomes in their protocol, 2 (1%) as primary and 88 (51%) as secondary outcome. Of the 173 trials, 35 (20%) reported QoL outcomes in a corresponding publication (4 modified from the protocol), 18 (10%) were published but failed to report QoL outcomes in the primary or a secondary publication, and 37 (21%) were not published at all. Of the 83 (48%) trials that did not specify QoL outcomes in their protocol, none subsequently reported QoL outcomes. Failure to report pre-specified QoL outcomes was not associated with industry sponsorship (versus non-industry), sample size, and multicentre (versus single centre) status but possibly with trial discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS About half of cancer trials specified QoL outcomes in their protocols. However, only 20% reported any QoL data in associated publications. Highly relevant information for decision making is often unavailable to patients, oncologists, and health policymakers

    What factors influence training opportunities for older workers? Three factorial surveys exploring the attitudes of HR professionals

    Get PDF
    The core research questions addressed in this paper are: what factors influence HR professionals in deciding whether to approve training proposals for older workers? What kind of training are they more likely to recommend for older employees and in which organizational contexts? We administered three factorial surveys to 66 HR professionals in Italy. Participants made specific training decisions based on profiles of hypothetical older workers. Multilevel analyses indicated that access to training decreases strongly with age, while highly-skilled older employees with low absenteeism rates are more likely to enjoy training opportunities. In addition, older workers displaying positive performance are more likely to receive training than older workers who perform poorly, suggesting that training late in working life may serve as a reward for good performance rather than as a means of enhancing productivity. The older the HR professional evaluating training proposals, the higher the probability that older workers will be recommended for training. keywords: training; older workers; HR professionals; factorial survey; multilevel model
    • 

    corecore