29 research outputs found

    Comparison of the quantification of KRAS mutations by digital PCR and E-ice-COLD-PCR in circulating-cell-free DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients

    No full text
    International audienceCirculating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) bears great promise as biomarker for personalized medicine, but ccfDNA ispresent only at low levels in the plasma or serum of cancer patients. E-ice-COLD-PCR is a recently developed enrichmentmethod to detect and identify mutations present at low-abundance in clinical samples. However, recentstudies have shown the importance to accurately quantify low-abundance mutations as clinicallyimportant decisions will depend on certainmutation thresholds. The possibility for an enrichmentmethod to accuratelyquantify the mutation levels remains a point of concern and might limit its clinical applicability.In the present study, we compared the quantification of KRAS mutations in ccfDNA from metastatic colorectalcancer patients by E-ice-COLD-PCR with two digital PCR approaches. For the quantification of mutations by Eice-COLD-PCR, cell lines with known mutations diluted into WT genomic DNA were used for calibration. E-ice-COLD-PCR and the two digital PCR approaches showed the same range of the mutation level and were concordantfor mutation levels below the clinical relevant threshold.E-ice-COLD-PCR can accurately detect and quantify low-abundantmutations in ccfDNA and has a shorter time toresults making it compatible with the requirements of analyses in a clinical setting without the loss of quantitativeaccuracy

    Circulating ESR1 mutations at the end of aromatase inhibitor adjuvant treatment and after relapse in breast cancer patients

    No full text
    Abstract Background Detection of circulating ESR1 mutations is associated with acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) in metastatic breast cancer. Until now, the presence of circulating ESR1 mutations at the end of adjuvant treatment by AI in early breast cancer had never been clearly established. In this context, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the circulating ESR1 mutation frequency at the end of adjuvant treatment and after relapse. Methods This monocentric retrospective study was based on available stored plasmas and included all early breast cancer patients who completed at least 2 years of AI adjuvant treatment and experienced a documented relapse after the end of their treatment. Circulating ESR1 mutations (D538G, Y537S/N/C) were assessed by droplet digital PCR in plasma samples taken at the end of adjuvant treatment, at time of relapse and at time of progression under first line metastatic treatment. Results A total of 42 patients were included, with a median adjuvant AI exposure of 60 months (range 41–85). No circulating ESR1 mutation was detectable at the end of AI adjuvant therapy. At first relapse, 5.3% of the patients (2/38) had a detectable circulating ESR1 mutation. At time of progression on first-line metastatic treatment, 33% of the patients (7/21) under AI had a detectable circulating ESR1 mutation compared to none of the patients under chemotherapy (0/10). The two patients with a detectable ESR1 mutation at relapse were treated by AI and had an increase of their variant allele fraction at time of progression on first-line metastatic treatment. Conclusions Circulating ESR1 mutation detection at the end of AI-based adjuvant treatment is not clinically useful. Circulating ESR1 mutation could be assessed as soon as first relapse to guide interventional studies

    Clinical relevance of circulating ESR1 mutations during endocrine therapy for advanced hormone-dependent endometrial carcinoma

    No full text
    Abstract Objective Endocrine therapy is frequently administered in patients with hormone dependent (HR+) metastatic endometrial cancer. ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance in HR + metastatic breast cancer and can be monitored using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The aim of this study was to explore the incidence and clinical relevance of circulating ESR1 mutations in patients treated by AI or megestrol acetate (M) for advanced endometrial carcinoma. Methodology This single-center retrospective study was performed at the Henri Becquerel Center (Rouen) and looked for circulating ESR1 gene mutations by droplet digital PCR (E380Q, L536R, Y537S, Y537N, Y537C, D538G, S463P) in patients with advanced HR + endometrial carcinoma treated between 2008 and 2020 for at least 30 days by AI or M. Analyses were performed before exposure and at progression/during endocrine therapy. Results Twenty-two patients were included: 13 were treated with AI, 12 of whom progressed; 9 patients were treated with M, 8 of whom progressed. 68.1% of the patients had low-grade endometrial carcinoma and 54.5% had received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The median duration of treatment was 152 days (min 47 – max 629) with AI and 155 days (min 91-max 1297) with M. Under AI, there was no ESR1 mutation at baseline, and one Y537C mutation at progression with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 0.14%. Under M, one patient had a Y537C (VAF 0.2%) at baseline that disappeared during treatment. Another patient had a Y537S mutation emergence at progression after 91 days of treatment (VAF 1.83%). There was no significant difference between the circulating DNA concentration before and after hormone therapy (p = 0.16). Conclusion ESR1 mutations do not seem to be involved in the mechanisms of resistance to AI or M in HR+ endometrial cancer. The clinical relevance of their detection is not demonstrated

    Disequilibrium between <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> Circular and Messenger RNAs Plays a Role in Breast Cancer

    No full text
    Breast cancer is a frequent disease for which the discovery of markers that enable early detection or prognostic assessment remains challenging. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are single-stranded structures in closed loops that are produced by backsplicing. CircRNA and messenger RNA (mRNA) are generated co-transcriptionally, and backsplicing and linear splicing compete against each other. As mRNAs are key players in tumorigenesis, we hypothesize that a disruption of the balance between circRNAs and mRNAs could promote breast cancer. Hence, we developed an assay for a simultaneous study of circRNAs and mRNAs, which we have called splice and expression analyses by exon ligation and high-throughput sequencing (SEALigHTS). Following SEALigHTS validation for BRCA1 and BRCA2, our hypothesis was tested using an independent research set of 95 pairs from tumor and adjacent normal breast tissues. In this research set, ratios of BRCA1 and BRCA2 circRNAs/mRNAs were significantly lower in the tumor breast tissue compared to normal tissue (p = 1.6 × 10−9 and p = 4.4 × 10−5 for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively). Overall, we developed an innovative method to study linear splicing and backsplicing, described the repertoire of BRCA1 and BRCA2 circRNAs, including 15 novel ones, and showed for the first time that a disequilibrium between BRCA1 and BRCA2 circRNAs and mRNAs plays a role in breast cancer
    corecore