Guidance on Noncorticosteroid Systemic Immunomodulatory Therapy in Noninfectious Uveitis: Fundamentals Of Care for UveitiS (FOCUS) Initiative.

TOPIC An international, expert-led consensus initiative to develop systematic, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis in the era of biologics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The availability of biologic agents for the treatment of human eye disease has altered practice patterns for the management of noninfectious uveitis. Current guidelines are insufficient to assure optimal use of noncorticosteroid systemic immunomodulatory agents. METHODS An international expert steering committee comprising 9 uveitis specialists (including both ophthalmologists and rheumatologists) identified clinical questions and, together with 6 bibliographic fellows trained in uveitis, conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol systematic review of the literature (English language studies from January 1996 through June 2016; Medline [OVID], the Central Cochrane library, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, BIOSIS, and Web of Science). Publications included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies with sufficient follow-up, case series with 15 cases or more, peer-reviewed articles, and hand-searched conference abstracts from key conferences. The proposed statements were circulated among 130 international uveitis experts for review. A total of 44 globally representative group members met in late 2016 to refine these guidelines using a modified Delphi technique and assigned Oxford levels of evidence. RESULTS In total, 10 questions were addressed resulting in 21 evidence-based guidance statements covering the following topics: when to start noncorticosteroid immunomodulatory therapy, including both biologic and nonbiologic agents; what data to collect before treatment; when to modify or withdraw treatment; how to select agents based on individual efficacy and safety profiles; and evidence in specific uveitic conditions. Shared decision-making, communication among providers and safety monitoring also were addressed as part of the recommendations. Pharmacoeconomic considerations were not addressed. CONCLUSIONS Consensus guidelines were developed based on published literature, expert opinion, and practical experience to bridge the gap between clinical needs and medical evidence to support the treatment of patients with noninfectious uveitis with noncorticosteroid immunomodulatory agents

GLAUCOME CHRONIQUE (GENETIQUE ET CORRELATIONS CLINIQUES)

PARIS7-Bibliothèque centrale (751132105) / SudocSudocFranceF

Ophthalmology

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and assess the risk factors associated with 3 adverse events (AE) of interest after Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy (Nd:YAG-caps): ocular hypertension (OHT), macular edema (ME) and retinal detachment (RD). DESIGN: Observational cohort study using a nationwide claims database. PARTICIPANTS: Adults who underwent Nd:YAG-caps between 2014 and 2017, with no ocular disease history in the year before. METHODS: Nd:YAG-caps patients were identified using data from the French national 1/97(th) representative sample and followed-up for 12 months post-Nd:YAG-caps. The time to AE was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with AE were assessed using Cox models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nd:YAG-caps epidemiology; patients' characteristics; proportion of patients with AE; Hazard ratios (HRs) associated to variables identified as factors associated with AEs of interest, overall and by AE. RESULTS: During the study period, 6,210 patients with Nd:YAG-caps were identified (7,958 procedures). The mean age (±sd) at Nd:YAG-caps was 75.0 (±10.3) years. The 3-month and 12-month overall AE rates (≥1 AE of interest [OHT, ME, RD]) were 8.6% and 13.3%, respectively. Among patients with ≥1 AE of interest, 68.4% of AEs occurred within 3 months post-Nd:YAG-caps. Three-month rates were similar for OHT and ME (≈5%). RD rate remained ≤0.5% over the entire follow-up. Cox models showed that patients with Nd:YAG-caps performed within 1-year post-cataract surgery were of higher risk of AE than those with later Nd:YAG-caps (HR 1.314 [1.034-1.669], p=0.0256). Diabetic patients were more at risk of OHT (HR 1.233 [1.005-1.513], p=0.0448) and ME (HR 1.810 [1.446-2.266], p=<.0001) than non-diabetic ones. Patients with Nd:YAG-caps within 1-year post-cataract surgery were more at risk of ME (HR 1.500 [1.087-2.070], p=0.0137). Patients with Nd:YAG-caps performed between the first- and second-year post-cataract were more at risk of OHT than patients with later Nd:YAG-caps (HR 1.429 [1.185-1.723], p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a national claims database, OHT and ME were the most frequent AE of interest post-Nd:YAG-caps, mainly observed within the first 3 months post-procedure, highlighting the need for a close follow-up during this period or a delayed capsulotomy if possible. Diabetes and an early Nd:YAG-caps post-cataract surgery were among the main drivers for AE occurrence

Lancet

Background Cataract surgery is one of the most common operations in health care. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) enables more precise ocular incisions and lens fragmentation than does phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS). We hypothesised that FLACS might improve outcomes in cataract surgery compared with PCS despite having higher costs. Methods We did a participant-masked randomised superiority clinical trial comparing FLACS and PCS in two parallel groups (permuted block randomisation stratified on centres via a centralised web-based application, allocation ratio 1:1, block size of 2 or 4 for unilateral cases and 2 or 6 for bilateral cases). Five French University Hospitals enrolled consecutive patients aged 22 years or older who were eligible for unilateral or bilateral cataract surgery. Participants, outcome assessors, and technicians carrying out examinations were masked to the surgical treatment allocation until the last follow-up visit and a sham laser procedure was set up for participants randomly assigned to the PCS arm. The primary clinical endpoint was the success rate of surgery, defined as a composite of four outcomes at a 3-month postoperative visit: absence of severe perioperative complication, a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0·0 LogMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) or better, an absolute refractive error of 0·75 dioptres or less, and unchanged postoperative corneal astigmatism power (≤0·5 dioptres) and axis (≤20°). The primary economic endpoint was the incremental cost per additional patient who had treatment success at 3 months. Primary outcomes were assessed in all randomly assigned patients who met all eligibility criteria (missing data considered as failure). We used mixed logistic regression models or mixed linear regression models for statistical comparisons, adjusted on centres and whether cataract surgery was bilateral or unilateral. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01982006. Findings Of the 907 patients (1476 eyes) randomly assigned between Oct 9, 2013, and Oct 30, 2015, 870 (704 eyes in FLACS group and 685 eyes in the PCS group) were analysed. We identified no significant difference in the success rate of surgery between the FLACS and PCS groups (FLACS: 41·1% [289 eyes]; PCS: 43·6% [299 eyes]); adjusted odds ratio 0·85, 95% CI 0·64–1·12, p=0·250). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €10 703 saved per additional patient who had treatment success with PCS compared with FLACS. We observed no severe adverse events during the femtosecond laser procedure, and most of the complications in the FLACS group related to the primary outcome measures occurred during the phacoemulsification phase or postoperatively. Interpretation Despite its advanced technology, femtosecond laser was not superior to phacoemulsification in cataract surgery and, with higher costs, did not provide an additional benefit over phacoemulsification for patients or health-care systems. Funding French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health

Adalimumab in patients with active and inactive, non-infectious uveitis: VISUAL I and VISUAL II trials

International audienc

Real-Life Efficacy, Safety, and Use of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Posterior Segment Inflammation Due to Non-infectious Uveitis (LOUVRE 2 Study)

International audienceINTRODUCTION: To evaluate real-life efficacy, safety, and treatment patterns with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) in posterior segment inflammation due to non-infectious uveitis (treatment-naïve or not) in French clinics.METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, observational, non-comparative, post-reimbursement study, consecutive patients with posterior segment inflammation due to non-infectious uveitis were enrolled and evaluated at baseline (day 0). Those who received DEX on day 0 were re-evaluated at months 2, 6, and 18. Retreatment with DEX and/or alternative therapies was allowed during follow-up.PRIMARY OUTCOME: patients (%) with at least a 15-letter gain in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 2 months. Secondary outcomes included patients (%) with at least 15-letter BCVA gains at 6 and 18 months; mean BCVA change from baseline at 2, 6, and 18 months; and patients (%) retreated, mean central retinal thickness (CRT), and adverse events (AEs) at all post-baseline visits.RESULTS: Ninety-seven of 245 enrolled patients with posterior segment inflammation due to non-infectious uveitis (80% previously treated) and disease duration of 5 years (average) received DEX on day 0 and were included in efficacy analyses. At month 2 (n = 91), 20.5% of patients (95% CI 12.0-28.9) gained at least 15 letters from a baseline mean of 60.9 letters; the mean gain was 6.2 letters (95% CI 3.5-8.9). At month 6, 50.0% (n = 38/76) of patients did not receive alternative treatment or DEX retreatment, mostly because inflammation had sufficiently subsided (n = 27/38, 71.1%). Although early study termination prevented efficacy analysis at 18 months (n = 12), CRT reductions persisted throughout follow-up. From baseline to month 18, 21/245 (8.6%) patients had DEX-related AEs; 17/245 (6.9%) had ocular hypertension (most common AE).CONCLUSION: LOUVRE 2 confirms DEX efficacy on visual acuity and CRT in predominantly DEX-pretreated patients with relatively old/stabilized uveitis. DEX tolerability was consistent with known/published data, confirming treatment benefits in posterior segment inflammation due to non-infectious uveitis.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02951975

IDENTIFICATION OF TOXOPLASMA-GONDII IN PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED SECTIONS BY THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION

NEI,IMMUNOL LAB,BLDG 10,RM 10N202,BETHESDA,MD 20892BRAZILIAN REGISTRY OPHTHALM PATHOL,SAO PAULO,BRAZILCLIN SILVEIRA,EREXIM,BRAZILARMED FORCES INST PATHOL,DEPT OPHTHALM PATHOL,WASHINGTON,DC 20306NIAID,PARASIT DIS LAB,BETHESDA,MD 20892ESCOLA PAULISTA MED SCH,BR-04023 SAO PAULO,BRAZILESCOLA PAULISTA MED SCH,BR-04023 SAO PAULO,BRAZILWeb of Scienc