Guide for the accreditation of health institutions

Nuestras instituciones de salud actualmente están pasando por im proceso de cambio propiciado por la Ley 100 de 1993 que habla de la Seguridad Social Integral y cuyo objetivo es garantizar los derechos irrenunciables de la persona y la comunidad para obtener la calidad de vida acorde con la dignidad humana mediante la protección de las contingencias que la afectan. El servicio público de Seguridad Social se prestará con sujeción a principios de eficiencia, universalidad, solidaridad, integridad, participación, oportunidad, agilidad, accesibilidad, continuidad, influencia, seguridad, integralidad, racionalidad, humanidad, transparencia, efectividad. La tendencia de nuestras instituciones es la de ir cada día ofreciendo productos que satisfagan las necesidades de las personas, es por eso que hablamos de procesos de cambio, programas de mejoramiento y trabajo con calidad, los cuales aplicados a las cosas significa hacerlas más aptas para el futuro usuario y cuando se aplican a servicios significa dignificarlas para que el ser humano los reciba con mayor satisfacción.INTRODUCCION 1 1. JUSTIFICACION 3 2. ANTECEDENTES 5 3. OBJETIVOS 8 3.1 GENERAL 8 3.2 ESPECIFICOS 8 4. MARCO TEORICO 9 4.1 MARCO CONCEPTUAL 9 4.1.1 Acreditación 9 4.1.2 Principios rectores 11 4.2 MARCO LEGAL 12 5. AUTOE VALUACION INSTITUCIONAL 16 6. METODOLOGIA 18 6.1 REQUISITO PARA LA ACREDITACION 18 6.2 DECISION DE SER ACREDITADO 19 7. VERIFICACION EXTERNA 20 8. ESTANDARES DE ACREDITACION 23 8.1 AREAS FUNCIONALES 23 8.2 CALIFICACION 25 8.3 CERTIFICACION 27 BIBLIOGRAFIAEspecializaciónOur health institutions are currently undergoing a process of change brought about by Law 100 of 1993, which speaks of Comprehensive Social Security and whose objective is to guarantee the inalienable rights of the person and the community to obtain a quality of life in accordance with dignity. by protecting the contingencies that affect it. The Social Security public service will be provided subject to the principles of efficiency, universality, solidarity, integrity, participation, opportunity, agility, accessibility, continuity, influence, security, comprehensiveness, rationality, humanity, transparency, effectiveness. The tendency of our institutions is to go every day offering products that meet the needs of people, that is why we speak of change processes, improvement programs and quality work, which applied to things means making them more suitable for the future user and when applied to services, it means dignifying them so that human beings receive them with greater satisfaction

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUN

Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUN