38 research outputs found
Koinon: Being-in-common, Heterology, Post-fundamentalism
Received: 27.09.2020. Accepted: 12.10.2020.Π ΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠΈΠ»Π° Π² ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡ: 27.09.2020. ΠΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ° ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ: 12.10.2020.The problem of being-in-common remains a fundamental problem of philosophy, social sciences and humanities. The purpose of this article is to analyze the changes in the nature of this problem, the incentives and prospects for its formulation and solution in the late XX β early XXI centuries. Being-incommon is increasingly shifting to the focus of human existence, acquires a decisive existential significance, acts as public opinion, and as a political motivation, and as a paradigm for the social sciences and humanities. The article argues that full awareness of the role of philosophy in describing and explaining the forms of being-in-common presupposes the need for a radical reorientation of both traditional philosophical constructions and the methodology of social and humanitarian cognition. Three dimensions of this reorientation are highlighted. Firstly, this is the βnew socialityβ, the undecidability between βglobalizationβ and βmondializationβ, as well as the need to deconstruct the very possibility of accepting a global or phenomenal world. Secondly, it is ontoheterology, which outlines the ways of overcoming ontological fundamentalism, building an βontology after ontotheologyβ. It exposes the understanding of being-in-common, the original sociality as groundless, anarchic, which arises as a direct correlate of the experience of groundlessness of existence, unrooted in any substance or common essence. Thirdly, this is postfundamentalism as a particular paradigm, style of thinking, postulating the transformation of the practices and techniques of thinking in response to the need to reposition the multiple real as immanent in thought itself. The article concludes that the three-dimensional βspaceβ of comprehending being-in-common sets a certain direction of philosophical and socio-humanitarian research, hidden behind them general methodological tendencies, and the relationship of these tendencies with the nature of social practice.ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ½Π΄Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊ. Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ, ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ² Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π₯Π₯ β Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π΅ Π₯Π₯I Π². Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠ³Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΡΡΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΡΠΊΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΡ, ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΌΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΡΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°Π΅Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠΎ-ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ
, ΡΡΠΎ Β«Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΒ», Π½Π΅ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Β«Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉΒ» ΠΈ Β«ΠΌΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉΒ», Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΡΠ°. ΠΠΎ-Π²ΡΠΎΡΡΡ
, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ, Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ½Π΄Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Β«ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈΒ» ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ, Π°Π½Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ° Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π½Π΅ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ-Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ ΡΡΠ±ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. Π-ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ
, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΡΠ½Π΄Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΌΠ°, ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊ ΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅Ρ Π½Π° Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΈ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Β«ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΒ» ΠΎΡΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ΅ Π·Π° Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ
Assessment of information value of targeted biopsy and endoscopic removal of colorectal polyps
This research is based on histological investigation of targeted biopsy material and resected polypsβ at 354 patients who applied to National Center of Oncology from 2005 to 2010. All patients underwent targeted biopsy at first with subsequent endoscopic polypectomy and 494 polyps were removed and histologically investigated. The most prevalence type was tubular polyp β 212 (43 %) cases. The rest types of polyps were distributed as follow: tubule-villous type β 125 (25.3 %), villous type β 16 (3.2 %), inflammatory type β 28 (5.7 %), hyperplastic type β 40 (8.1 %), hamartoma type β 21 (4.3 %) cases. In 52 (10.4 %) cases malignant polyps were revealed.Sensitivity of targeted biopsy in iagnostics of dysplasia was 65.1 % while in revealing of malignancy was even lower β just 36.5 %. So we consider performing of endoscopic polypectomy and histological evaluation of resected polyps in all case even after previous targeted biopsy
Π’Π΅Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π΄Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΠ»Π°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠ°
Objective: to develop technologies for preoperative preparation of the posterior lamellar corneal graft based on our own formulation of the preservation medium for optimal dehydration of the donor cornea and a technique for cutting out an ultrathin flap using an optimized method at the Eye Tissue Bank. Materials methods. In a series of experimental studies, we obtained data on the hydration level of cadaveric donor corneas that were preserved in various solutions at different observation periods. Using 16 corneas, analytical weighing and pachymetry were performed via optical coherence tomography in the experimental (n = 8) and control (n = 8) groups. Morphological and functional characteristics of the corneal endothelium were then assessed. At the next stage of work, ultrathin grafts were formed from 16 corneas after hypothermic preservation in the experimental (n = 8) and control (n = 8) solutions by single-pass microkeratome, followed by microscopy of the samples using a scanning electron microscope. Results. After the first days of preservation in the proposed solution, there was dehydration of 9% cornea in the experimental group in comparison with the samples of the control group. After 4 days of preservation, there was no reliable difference found between the groups (p > 0.05) in the study of the endothelial cell viability of ultra-thin corneal grafts by immunofluorescent microscopy using the Β«Live and deadΒ» marker. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that corneal stromal collagen fibers, preserved in the proposed medium, retained their integrity. Conclusion. The proposed technology can be recommended for use at eye banks for formation of an ultra-thin corneal graft at the preoperative stage.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ Π·Π°Π΄Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π³ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²ΡΠΊΡΠ°ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΠ»Π°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠ°. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. Π ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π³ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ°Ρ
ΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ 16 ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π·Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π² ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ (n = 8) ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ (n = 8) Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ
, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ. ΠΠ° ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠ· 16 ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ (n = 8) ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ (n = 8) ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΌ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ΅. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π΄Π΅Π³ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π½Π° 9% ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ. ΠΠΎ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ 4-Ρ
ΡΡΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ° Β«Live and deadΒ» Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ (p > 0,05). ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡ Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»Π° ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π°Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ, ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
Π³Π»Π°Π·Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΡ
Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ² Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅
ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²
This research is based on histological investigation of targeted biopsy material and resected polypsβ at 354 patients who applied to National Center of Oncology from 2005 to 2010. All patients underwent targeted biopsy at first with subsequent endoscopic polypectomy and 494 polyps were removed and histologically investigated. The most prevalence type was tubular polyp β 212 (43 %) cases. The rest types of polyps were distributed as follow: tubule-villous type β 125 (25.3 %), villous type β 16 (3.2 %), inflammatory type β 28 (5.7 %), hyperplastic type β 40 (8.1 %), hamartoma type β 21 (4.3 %) cases. In 52 (10.4 %) cases malignant polyps were revealed.Sensitivity of targeted biopsy in iagnostics of dysplasia was 65.1 % while in revealing of malignancy was even lower β just 36.5 %. So we consider performing of endoscopic polypectomy and histological evaluation of resected polyps in all case even after previous targeted biopsy.ΠΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ
ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² Ρ 354 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Ρ 2005 ΠΏΠΎ 2010 Π³. ΠΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ (ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ 494 ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΠ°). ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π³ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΡΡ ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏ β 212 (43 %) ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ. ΠΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΠΏΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ: ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ»ΠΎ-Π²ΠΈΠ»Π»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΏ β 125 (25,3 %) ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π², Π²ΠΈΠ»Π»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΏ β 16 (3,2 %), Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΏ β 28 (5,7 %), Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΏ β 40 (8,1 %) ΠΈ Π³Π°ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΏ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΠ° β 21 (4,3 %) ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉ. Π 52 (10,4 %) ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ
Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ³Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΡ. Π§ΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π·ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° 65,1 %, Π° Π² Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ³Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ β Π»ΠΈΡΡ 36,5 %. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΌΡ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ Π³ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΈ Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ
, Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ
Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ. Π‘ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ 15-Π»Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
Background. Despite significount successes in treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma of urogenital system in children there are unresolved questions of choise of optimal chemotherapys combinations, intensity of chemotherapy, volumes and terms of radiotherapy, tactics of treatment residual tumors in last 3 decades.The objective: show 15 years experience of treatment local and locally prevalent rhabdomyosarcoma urogenital system in children. The prognosis for children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma has improved with refinements in multi-modal therapy.Materials and methods. In reseach are included 86 patients with a median age of 8.4 (0.7β17) with a local genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma, treated in N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology from 2000 to 2016. All patients were treated in different riskadopted clinical protocol included chemotherapy and radiotherapy (IRS, SIOP, CWS and local protocol DORMS-6).Results. A 10-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 76 and 72 % in the entire group rhabdomyosarcoma patients, respectively.Conclusion. The effectiveness of the risk-adopted strategy in the genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma treatment as well as the need of new approaches and in the cases of residual viable tumor after induction chemotherapy was demonstrated.Β ΠΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ
ΠΈ Π² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ, Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 3 Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ β ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΡ 15βΠ»Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ 86 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² (ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ 8,4 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π° (0,7β17 Π»Π΅Ρ)) Ρ ΡΠΌΠ±ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠΈΡ
Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΠΠΠ¦ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠΌ. Π. Π. ΠΠ»ΠΎΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π° Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Ρ 2000 ΠΏΠΎ 2016 Π³. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ-Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π°ΠΌ (IRS, SIOP, CWS-10, ΠΠΠ ΠΠ‘-6) Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·Π΅ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΅Π² TNM, IRSG ΠΈ COG.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Ρ Π²ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ Π±Π΅Π·ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ Π²ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° 76 ΠΈ 72 % ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ.Β ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ-Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ, Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π½Π΅ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΡΠΌΠΈ
ΠΠ€Π€ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π’Π¬ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ’Π« Π ΠΠ ΠΠ€ΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠ«Π₯ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠΠΠ Π£ ΠΠΠ¦ΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠ Π‘ ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠ-Π ΠΠ‘ΠΠ ΠΠ‘Π’Π ΠΠΠΠΠΠ«Π Π ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠ’ΠΠΠ¬ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ«
The analysis of the performed study has established that zoledronic acid is an effective agent in multimodality therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer (PC) and allows long-term stabilization of bone tissue. In addition, there is evidence for the efficacy of zoledronic acid in preventing bone metastases (BM) and increasing the time to the first BM. The currently accumulated experience with zoledronic acid used in PC permits one to consider its use as standard concomitant therapy.ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ (Π ΠΠ) ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ. ΠΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π·ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ² (ΠΠ), Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΠ. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΊ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π ΠΠ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π΅Π΅ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ
DIGITALIZATION OF SOCIETY AS SOCIAL ENGINEERING: ETHICAL PROBLEMATIZATION
The article considers the connection between the engineer thinking, approaches to social typification and new forms of the human entity trough the prism of ethical problematization.ΠΒ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΒ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΒ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° Π²Β ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ.Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ΅ Π‘ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ° Β«ΠΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°: ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π½ΡΠ΅ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΒ» (Π Π€ ΠΠ-1740.2019.6)