Clinical and surgical assistance in prostate cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implementation of assistance protocols

Purpose: Propose an approach of prostate cancer (PCa) patients during COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: We conducted a review of current literature related to surgical and clinical management of patients during COVID-19 crisis paying special attention to oncological ones and especially those suffering from PCa. Based on these publications and current urological guidelines, a manual to manage PCa patients is suggested. Results: Patients suffering from cancer are likely to develop serious complications from COVID-19 disease together with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the management of oncological patients should be taken into special consideration and most of the treatments postponed. In case the procedure is not deferrable, it should be adapted to the current situation. While the shortest radiotherapy (RT) regimens should be applied, surgical procedures must undergo the following recommendations proposed by main surgical associations. PCa prognosis is generally favourable and therefore one can safely delay most of the biopsies up to 6 months without interfering with survival outcomes in the vast majority of cases. In the same way, most of the localised PCa patients are suitable for active surveillance (AS) or hormonal therapy until local definitive treatment could be reconsidered. In metastatic as well as castration resistant PCa stages, adding androgen receptor targeted agents (abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide) to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) could be considered in high risk patients. On the contrary, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and Radium-223 must be avoided with regard to the consequence of hematologic toxicity and risk of COVID-19 infection because of immunodepression. Conclusions: Most of the biopsies should be delayed while AS is advised in those patients with low risk PCa. ADT allows us to defer definitive local treatment in many cases of intermediate and high risk PCa. In regard to metastatic and castration resistant PCa, combination therapies with abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide could be considered. Chemotherapy, Radium-223 and immunotherapy are discouraged

Active surveillance in prostate cancer: role of available biomarkers in daily practice

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men. The diagnosis is currently based on PSA levels, which are associated with overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Moreover, most PCas are localized tumours; hence, many patients with low-/very low-risk PCa could benefit from active surveillance (AS) programs instead of more aggressive, active treatments. Heterogeneity within inclusion criteria and follow-up strategies are the main controversial issues that AS presently faces. Many biomarkers are currently under investigation in this setting; however, none has yet demonstrated enough diagnostic ability as an independent predictor of pathological or clinical progression. This work aims to review the currently available literature on tissue, blood and urine biomarkers validated in clinical practice for the management of AS patients

A multistate model and its standalone tool to predict hospital and ICU occupancy by patients with COVID-19

Objective: This study aims to build a multistate model and describe a predictive tool for estimating the daily number of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital beds occupied by patients with coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). Material and methods: The estimation is based on the simulation of patient trajectories using a multistate model where the transition probabilities between states are estimated via competing risks and cure models. The input to the tool includes the dates of COVID-19 diagnosis, admission to hospital, admission to ICU, discharge from ICU and discharge from hospital or death of positive cases from a selected initial date to the current moment. Our tool is validated using 98,496 cases positive for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 extracted from the Aragón Healthcare Records Database from July 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. Results: The tool demonstrates good performance for the 7- and 14-days forecasts using the actual positive cases, and shows good accuracy among three scenarios corresponding to different stages of the pandemic: 1) up-scenario, 2) peak-scenario and 3) down-scenario. Long term predictions (two months) also show good accuracy, while those using Holt-Winters positive case estimates revealed acceptable accuracy to day 14 onwards, with relative errors of 8.8%. Discussion: In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals must evolve in a dynamic way. Our prediction tool is designed to predict hospital occupancy to improve healthcare resource management without information about clinical history of patients. Conclusions: Our easy-to-use and freely accessible tool (https://github.com/peterman65) shows good performance and accuracy for forecasting the daily number of hospital and ICU beds required for patients with COVID-19

Variabilidad dentro del Registro Nacional multicéntrico en Vigilancia Activa; cuestionario a urólogos

Introducción: Nuestro objetivo principal es describir la utilización actual en España de la vigilancia activa (VA) identificando áreas de potencial mejora. Métodos: Un cuestionario generado en AEU/PIEM/2014/0001 (NCT02865330) fue remitido a todos los investigadores asociados (IA) durante los meses de enero-marzo del 2016. Incluía 7 dominios diferentes cubriendo diferentes aspectos en VA. Resultados: Treinta y tres de cuarenta y un IA respondieron el cuestionario. La VA es principalmente controlada por los Servicios de Urología (87,9%). Hubo una gran heterogeneidad en las clásicas variables clínico-patológicas como criterios de selección. La densidad de antígeno prostático específico (PSAd) solo se usaba en el 36,4% IA. La RMmp era claramente infrautilizada como estadificación inicial (6%). Solo el 27,3% reconocía un alto nivel de experiencia en RMmp de sus colegas radiólogos. Con relación a la biopsia de confirmación, la mayoría de los centros utilizaban la vía transrectal y solo 2/33 la vía transperineal/software de fusión. La mitad de los IA entrevistados pasaron a tratamiento activo ante progresión patológica a Gleason 7 (3 + 4). No existió consenso en cuanto a cuándo pasar a estrategia de observación. Conclusiones: El estudio demostró la infrautilización del consentimiento informado y de los cuestionarios de calidad de vida. El PSAd no se incluía como elemento decisor en la estrategia inicial en la mayoría. Se plasmó una desconfianza en la experiencia de los urólogos con la RMmp y una infrautilización de la vía transperineal, así como la no existencia de consenso en los protocolos de seguimiento y en los criterios de tratamiento activo., confirmando la necesidad de estudios prospectivos analizando el papel de la RMmp y los biomarcadores. Background: Our main objective was to report the current use of active surveillance in Spain and to identify areas for potential improvement. Methods: A questionnaire generated by the Platform for Multicentre Studies of the Spanish Urology Association (AEU/PIEM/2014/0001, NCT02865330) was sent to all associate researchers from January to March 2016. The questionnaire included 7 domains covering various aspects of active surveillance. Results: Thirty-three of the 41 associate researchers responded to the questionnaire. Active surveillance is mainly controlled by the urology departments (87.9%). There was considerable heterogeneity in the classical clinical-pathological variables as selection criteria. Only 36.4% of the associate researchers used prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd). Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was clearly underused as initial staging (6%). Only 27.3% of the researchers stated that their radiology colleagues had a high level of experience in mpMRI. In terms of the confirmation biopsy, most of the centres used the transrectal pathway, and only 2 out of 33 used the transperineal pathway or fusion software. Half of the researchers interviewed applied active treatment when faced with disease progression to Gleason 7 (3+4). There was no consensus on when to transition to an observation strategy. Conclusions: The study showed the underutilisation of informed consent and quality-of-life questionnaires. PSAd was not included as a decisive element in the initial strategy for most researchers. There was a lack of confidence in the urologists’ mpMRI experience and an underutilisation of the transperineal pathway. There was also no consensus on the follow-up protocols and active treatment criteria, confirming the need for prospective studies to analyse the role of mpMRI and biomarkers

Predictors Of Positivity Of [F-18]F-Choline PET-CT In Prostate Cancer Recurrence. Preliminary Results

EP-173 Aim/Introduction: To analyze the validity of [18F]F-Choline PET-CT results in prostate cancer recurrence in our daily practice, based on theoretical cut-off points of prostatespecific antigen (PSA), its kinetic, and PSA doubling time (PSADT), to identify predictors of positivity and modify the indication criteria. Materials and Methods: Prior to the validity analysis, a descriptive, prospective analysis of consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated with curative intent by radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT), who underwent PET-CT scan with recurrence criteria: PSA =1 or PSA 0.4-1 with PSADT Nadir + 2 after RT, was performed. Results: From April to December 2019, 69 patients were included, 40 were treated with RP (58%) and 29 with RT (42%). In 45 patients (65%) PET-CT was able to identify recurrence of the disease (positive PET) and in 24 it was not (negative PET). Of patients treated with RP, 82, 5% (33/40) had PSA>1, and of those, 61% were positive PET. 17, 5% (7/40) had PSA6months (28/69), in 71% if PSADT6 months, in 61% and 92% if PSADT<6 months and in 77% and 100% if PSADT<3 months. Conclusion: Preliminarily and awaiting validation, it seems that PSA>1 after RP or Nadir +2 after RT is an indicator of PET-CT. There seems to be a tendency that shows that PSA<1 after RP is an indicator of PET-CT if PSADT<3 months. PSADT <3 or <6 months could be the best predictor of positivity of PET-CT with [18F]F-Choline in recurrent prostate cancer

Role of the 4Kscore test as a predictor of reclassification in prostate cancer active surveillance

Background: Management of active surveillance (AS) in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients could be improved with new biomarkers, such as the 4Kscore test. We analyze its ability to predict tumor reclassification by upgrading at the confirmatory biopsy at 6 months. Methods: Observational, prospective, blinded, and non-randomized study, within the Spanish National Registry on AS (AEU/PIEM/2014/0001; NCT02865330) with 181 patients included after initial Bx and inclusion criteria: PSA =10 ng/mL, cT1c-T2a, Grade group 1, =2 cores, and =5 mm/50% length core involved. Central pathological review of initial and confirmatory Bx was performed on all biopsy specimens. Plasma was collected 6 months after initial Bx and just before confirmatory Bx to determine 4Kscore result. In order to predict reclassification defined as Grade group =2, we analyzed 4Kscore, percent free to total (%f/t) PSA ratio, prostate volume, PSA density, family history, body mass index, initial Bx, total cores, initial Bx positive cores, initial Bx % of positive cores, initial Bx maximum cancer core length and initial Bx cancer % involvement. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, non-parametric trend test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate established differences between groups of reclassification. Results: A total of 137 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighteen patients (13.1%) were reclassified at confirmatory Bx. The %f/t PSA ratio and 4Kscore showed differences between the groups of reclassification (Yes/No). Using 7.5% as cutoff for the 4Kscore, we found a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 29%, with no reclassifications to Grade group 3 for patients with 4Kscore below 7.5% and 2 (6%) missed Grade group 2 reclassified patients. Using this threshold value there is a biopsy reduction of 27%. Additionally, 4Kscore was also associated with changes in tumor volume. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that the 4Kscore may be a useful tool in the decision-making process to perform a confirmatory Bx in active surveillance management

4kscore test, prostate cancer prevention trial-risk calculator y european research screening prostate-risk calculator en la predicción del cáncer de próstata de alto grado; estudio preliminar

Introducción: Frente al sobrediagnóstico y al sobretratamiento en cáncer de próstata (CaP) se establecen estrategias terapéuticas como la vigilancia activa o la terapia focal, o métodos para precisar el diagnóstico del CaP de alto grado (CaP-AG), Gleason = 7, como la resonancia magnética multiparamétrica o nuevos marcadores como el 4Kscore Test (4KsT).: Es nuestro propósito testar mediante un estudio piloto la capacidad del 4KsT como identificador de CaP-AG (suma de Gleason = 7) en biopsia de próstata (Bx) y compararlo con otros modelos pronósticos multivariantes disponibles, como el Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial-Risk Calculator 2.0 (PCPTRC 2.0) y el European Research Screening Prostate Cancer-Risk Calculator 4 (ERSPC-RC 4). Material y métodos: Cincuenta y un pacientes sometidos a BxP según práctica clínica habitual, con un mínimo de 10 cilindros. Diagnóstico de CaP-AG consensuado por 4 uropatólogos. Comparación de las predicciones ofrecidas por los diferentes modelos mediante prueba U Mann-Whitney, áreas bajo la curva ROC (AUC) (test de DeLong), funciones de densidad de probabilidad, diagramas de caja y curvas de utilidad clínica (CUC). Resultados: Un 43% presentaron CaP y un 23,5% CaP-AG. Las medianas de probabilidad de 4KsT, PCPTRC 2.0 y ERSPC-RC 4 fueron significativamente diferentes entre los pacientes con CaP-AG y no CaP-AG (p = 0,022), siendo más diferenciadas en el caso de 4KsT (mediana en CaP-AG: 51,5% [percentil 25-75: 25-80,5%], frente a 16% [P 25-75: 8-26,5%] en no CaP-AG [p = 0,002]). Todos los modelos mostraron AUC por encima de 0,7 sin diferencias significativas entre ninguno de ellos y 4KsT (p = 0,20). Las funciones de densidad de probabilidad y diagramas de caja muestran una buena capacidad discriminativa, especialmente en los modelos de ERSPC-RC 4 y 4KsT. Las CUC muestran como un punto de corte del 9% de 4KsT identifica a todos los CaP-AG y permite un ahorro del 22% de biopsias, similar a lo que ocurre con los modelos de ERSPC-RC 4 y un punto de corte del 3%. Conclusiones: Los modelos predictivos evaluados ofrecen una buena capacidad de discriminación del CaP-AG en Bx. 4KsT es un buen modelo clasificatorio en su conjunto, seguido de ERSPC-RC 4 y PCPTRC 2.0. Las CUC permiten sugerir puntos de corte de decisión clínica: 9% para 4KsT y 3% en ERSPC-RC 4. Este estudio preliminar debe ser interpretado con cautela por su limitado tamaño muestral. Introduction: To prevent the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer (PC), therapeutic strategies have been established such as active surveillance and focal therapy, as well as methods for clarifying the diagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer (HGPC) (defined as a Gleason score =7), such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and new markers such as the 4Kscore test (4. KsT).By means of a pilot study, we aim to test the ability of the 4. KsT to identify HGPC in prostate biopsies (Bx) and compare the test with other multivariate prognostic models such as the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator 2.0 (PCPTRC 2.0) and the European Research Screening Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator 4 (ERSPC-RC 4). Material and methods: Fifty-one patients underwent a prostate Bx according to standard clinical practice, with a minimum of 10 cores. The diagnosis of HGPC was agreed upon by 4 uropathologists. We compared the predictions from the various models by using the Mann-Whitney U test, area under the ROC curve (AUC) (DeLong test), probability density function (PDF), box plots and clinical utility curves. Results: Forty-three percent of the patients had PC, and 23.5% had HGPC. The medians of probability for the 4. KsT, PCPTRC 2.0 and ERSPC-RC 4 were significantly different between the patients with HGPC and those without HGPC (p=.022) and were more differentiated in the case of 4. KsT (51.5% for HGPC 25-75 percentile: 25-80.5%] vs. 16% P 25-75: 8-26.5%] for non-HGPC; p = 002). All models presented AUCs above 0.7, with no significant differences between any of them and 4. KsT (p=.20). The PDF and box plots showed good discriminative ability, especially in the ERSPC-RC 4 and 4. KsT models. The utility curves showed how a cutoff of 9% for 4. KsT identified all cases of HGPC and provided a 22% savings in biopsies, which is similar to what occurs with the ERSPC-RC 4 models and a cutoff of 3%. Conclusions: The assessed predictive models offer good discriminative ability for HGPCs in Bx. The 4. KsT is a good classification model as a whole, followed by ERSPC-RC 4 and PCPTRC 2.0. The clinical utility curves help suggest cutoff points for clinical decisions: 9% for 4. KsT and 3% for ERSPC-RC 4. This preliminary study should be interpreted with caution due to its limited sample size

Asesoramiento genético en cáncer de próstata: ¿cómo implementarlo en la práctica clínica diaria?

El cáncer de próstata tiene un protagonismo socio-sanitario innegable en nuestros días y sistemas de salud. Su impacto epidemiológico cuantitativamente está muy próximo a otros tumores como el cáncer de colon y el cáncer de mama, en los que el asesoramiento genético forma parte de su práctica clínica habitual, tanto en la evaluación inicial como en la selección de estrategias terapéuticas. Los síndromes de cáncer hereditario, mama/ovario y síndrome de Lynch, forman parte del asesoramiento genético en estos tumores y hoy día también sabemos que pueden tener relación con el cáncer de próstata. Ha llegado el momento de implementar el asesoramiento genético en cáncer de próstata desde las etapas más iniciales de su abordaje, desde la sospecha inicial hasta los tumores más avanzados.Presentamos una revisión actualizada de nuestro grupo de trabajo interdisciplinar sobre la literatura científica, guías de práctica clínica y documentos de consenso hasta la creación y redacción de un «Protocolo de asesoramiento genético en cáncer de próstata», centrado en el estudio de línea germinal, de fácil aplicabilidad en los diferentes entornos asistenciales. Dicho protocolo se encuentra actualmente implementado en nuestra práctica habitual y da respuesta a tres preguntas concretas: ¿A quién realizar asesoramiento genético en cáncer de próstata?, ¿qué panel de genes analizar?, y ¿cómo aconsejar de acuerdo con los resultados obtenidos? Otros aspectos acerca de quién debe realizar el asesoramiento genético, consideraciones éticas y normativa también son recogidos

Running Title: multitarget cannabinoid agonists for AD treatment

43 p.-8 fig.-2 tab.Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia in the elderly, is a neurodegenerative disorder marked by progressive impairment of cognitive ability. Patients with AD display neuropathological lesions including senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and neuronal loss. There are no disease-modifying drugs currently available. With the number of affected individuals increasing dramatically throughout the world, there is obvious urgent need for effective treatment strategy for AD. The multifactorial nature of AD encouraged the development of multifunctional compounds, able to interact with several putative targets. Here, we have evaluated the effects of two in-house designed cannabinoid receptors (CB) agonists showing inhibitory actions on β-secretase-1 (BACE-1) (NP137) and BACE-1/butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) (NP148), on cellular models of AD, including immortalized lymphocytes from late-onset AD patients. Furthermore, the performance of TgAPP mice in a spatial navigation task was investigated following chronic administration of NP137 and NP148. We report here that NP137 and NP148 showed neuroprotective effects in amyloid-β-treated primary cortical neurons, and NP137 in particular rescued the cognitive deficit of TgAPP mice. The latter compound was able to blunt the abnormal cell response to serum addition or withdrawal of lymphoblasts derived from AD patients. It is suggested that NP137 could be a good drug candidate for future treatment of AD.This work has been supported by grants from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (CTQ2015-66313-R, and RTI2018-096100-B-I00) and CIBERNED to MLC.Peer reviewe