101 research outputs found

    The Efficacy of the Affinity Column-mediated Immunoassay Method in Cyclosporine Concentration Assay Compared with the Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay Method

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Cyclosporine is a potent immunosuppressive drug used in organ transplantation. Because of its substantial toxic effect, narrow therapeutic index, and the inter-individual variability of pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring of the whole blood cyclosporine concentration has been recommended. We have investigated the comparability of the results of two immunoassay systems, the affinity column- mediated immunoassay (ACMIA) and the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), and compared the differences in the cyclosporine concentrations between the two methods in relation to the hematologic and biochemical values. Methods: One hundred twenty-one blood samples from kidney recipients were used. We used Dimension(R) RxL HM with a CSA Flex(R) reagent cartilage for the ACMIA method and AXSYM(R) Cyclosporine for the MEIA method. Results: Cyclosporine concentrations measured by the ACMIA method (n=121) were closely correlated with those measured by the MEIA method (r=0.948, P๏ผœ0.0001). The Bland-Altman plot using concentration differences between the two methods and the average of the two methods also showed no specific trends (R2=0.02, P=0.125). Except hematocrit, other hematologic and biochemical value (albumin, total bilirubin) didn``t affect to both cyclosporine level by MEIA and ACMIC method. Both cyclosporine levels determined by the MEIA method and the ACMIA method were positively correlated with hematocrit (P๏ผœ0.05). Conclusion: The ACMIA method used for a cyclosporine assay is precise and has advantages, including the lack of a required pretreatment procedure, and shows same influence by hematocrit compared with the MEIA.ope

    Effects of Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Inhibition on Platelet-derived Growth Factor- Induced Fibronectin Secretion and Cellular Reactive Oxygen Species in Mouse Mesangial Cells

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Mesangial cell extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis plays an important role in various renal diseases. Mycophenolic acid (MPA), which is an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), inhibits mesangial cell proliferation and ECM synthesis. However, the exact mechanism of MPA has not been clearly elucidated in mesangial cells. To examine the relative importance of IMPDH on the inhibitory action of MPA, we compared the effects of MPA or IMPDH2 siRNA on platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced fibronectin secretion and cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in mouse mesangial cells (MMC). Methods: MMC were stimulated with PDGF 10 ng/ml with or without MPA 0.1โˆผ10ฮผM, IMPDH2 siRNA 10โˆผ50 nM, or N-acetylcystein (NAC). IMPDH2 siRNA was transiently transfected by lipofectamine for 24 hours. MPA 0.1โˆผ10ฮผM, ribavirin 10โˆผ100ฮผM, and NAC 5 mM were administered 1 hour before the stimulation. Cell viability was measured by methylthiazoletetrazolium (MTT) assay, fibronectin secretion by Western blot analysis, and dichlorofluorescein (DCF)-sensitive cellular ROS by flow cytometry. Results: PDGF 10 ng/ml effectively increased fibronectin secretion and cellular ROS in MMC. MPA and NAC at concentration without affecting basal level of fibronectin and cellular ROS ameliorated PDGF-induced fibronectin secretion and cellular ROS. However, IMPDH2 siRNA only partially reduced PDGF- induced fibronectin secretion and cellular ROS in MMC. Conclusion: These results suggest that MPA may inhibit PDGF-induced fibronectin secretion partly through IMPDH2 or cellular ROS in MMC, and there may be other mechanisms on the inhibitory action of MPA in mesenchymal cells.ope

    Pre-transplant Serum Soluble CD30 Level; Correlation with Panel Reactive Antibodies and Lymphocyte Cross Matching

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Serum level of soluble form CD30 (sCD30), a marker for T helper 2-type cytokine-producing T cells, is used as a marker of immunologic status of pre-transplant recipient that can predict graft rejection and graft survival. This study compared pre-transplant serum sCD30 levels with conventional pre-transplant immunologic parameter, such as panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) and lymphocyte cross matching (LCM). Methods: Adult seventy two patients were enrolled this study. The blood for tests was sampled simultaneously. Measurement of serum sCD30 level was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Bender MedSystems, Co. CA, USA). We tested PRA using a commercial ELISA kit (Lambda Cell Tray Lymphocytotoxicity assay)(One Lambda Inc. CA, USA). We established LCM tests for T cells by Modified NIH (National institute center of health)/Johnson`s Method/AHG (Anti human globulin), and for B cells by warm test. Results: Mean score of sCD30 was 90.3ยฑ46.4 U/mL, ranged from 12.2 to 244.4 U/mL. There was no significant correlation between patient`s age or sex and sCD30 level. The correlation between sCD30 and mode or duration of dialysis was not statistically 63 significant clinical situation. The result of LCM didn`t show significant correlation with sCD30 level (87.3ยฑ55.7 U/mL in LCM positive group versus 91.9ยฑ41.3 U/mL in LCM negative group, P=0.696). And sCD30 level equal to or more than 86 U/mL could not predict the positive result of LCM. The positive and negative predictive value of sCD30 to LCM was merely 27.8% and 58.3% (P=0.322). Also the correlation between sCD30 level and PRA was not significant (P=1.0). Conclucion: There was no significant correlation between serum sCD30 level and conventional immunologic parameter such as PRA or LCM. That means the pre-transplant monitoring of the sCD30 level can be used as an independent immunologic parameter.ope

    Long-term Change of Renal Function after Donor Nephrectomy for Kidney Transplantation

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Occurrence of renal failure and its related complications such as hypertension are long-term problems after donor nephrectomy for living donor kidney transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed renal function of unilateral kidney donor. Methods: From 669 living donors for kidney transplantation from December 1998 to October 2006, laboratory data related to renal function are collected from hospital medical record retrospectively in 251 (37.5%) donors who were followed-up after discharge. The selection criteria of donors were: 1) pre-nephrectomy serum creatinine level below 1.5 mg/dL, 2) no radiologic abnormality in bilateral kidney. The donor nephrectomy was performed by conventional open nephrectomy or video assisted minilaparotomy surgery. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study was used as renal function monitoring parameter. Results: In immediate post-nephrectomy period, e-GFR was decreased to 67.8ยฑ14.6% of pre-nephrectomy level (93.8ยฑ19.9 mL/min/1.73 m2). The urinary protein excretion for 24 hours was increased to 255% of pre-nephrectomy level (76.4ยฑ44.6 mg/day), but cases with proteinuria more than 300 mg per day were only 4 cases (1.7%, 4/251). After 14.0ยฑ15.2 months follow-up (range: 1~80 months), two cases (0.8%, 2/251) of renal failure (chronic kidney disease stage 5) were found. Relative renal function (post-nephrectomy e-GFR ratio versus pre-nephrectomy e-GFR, %) was increased by post-nephrectomy duration. The mean scores of e-GFR ratio within post-nephrectomy 2 months, 3~11 months, 12~23 months and after 24 months were 64.8ยฑ10.4%, 66.4ยฑ9.7%, 69.5ยฑ10.9% and 75.8ยฑ17.6% respectively. The relative e-GFR ratio after 24 months was significantly different from those of within 24 months (P๏ผœ0.0001 by ANOVA). In linear regression analysis, mean increment of e-GFR ratio per post-nephrectomy year was 2.88%. Conclusion: In spite of possibility of renal failure, our study shows the long-term compensation of residual renal function after nephrectomy.ope

    Risk Factors of Post-transplantation Diabetes Mellitus in Renal Transplant Recipients

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in renal allograft recipients and investigate the risk factors contributing to the development and progression of PTDM and its underlying pathogenic mechanism(s). Methods: We analyzed the incidence and risk factors of PTDM after renal transplantation, retrospectively. A total of 913 renal transplant recipients with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were enrolled. The recipient who needs medical treatment of hyperglycemia more than one month was considered as PTDM patient. We classified PTDM as early PTDM (within post-Tx 1 year) and late PTDM. Results: Two hundred seven cases of PTDM were developed (22.7%) out of 913 patients. The cumulative incidence of PTDM was 9.4%, 20.5% and 29.0% at post-transplantation 1-, 5- and 10 year respectively. In uni-variate and multivariate analysis of PTDM onset, elderly recipients, tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive group and hepatitis B virus carrier group showed significantly higher incidence of PTDM. Among 207 cases of PTDM, early and late PTDM were 85 cases and 122 cases respectively. The late PTDM developed persistently after post-transplant 5 years. In risk factor analysis of early and late PTDM, late PTDM showed different results compared to early PTDM. The clinical conditions that cause larger dose or high level of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), such as double immunosuppressive regimen group, induction immunosuppressive therapy-free group and unrelated donor transplant group, were a significant independent risk factor of late PTDM. Conclusion: Our data showed clinical clues that persistent cumulative CNI exposure was correlated with onset of late PTDM. Careful selection of immunosuppressive regimen in high-risk recipients such as elderly patients and hepatitis B virus carrier may decrease the development of PTDM.ope

    ๋งˆ์ด์ฝ” ํŽ˜๋†€์‚ฐ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ทŒ๋„์„ธํฌ์ฃผ ์‚ฌ๋ฉธ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ „

    Get PDF
    ๋ชฉ์ : Mycophenolic acid (MPA)๋Š” ์ทŒ์žฅ์ด์‹์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฉด์—ญ์–ต์ œ์ œ๋กœ inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH)์˜ ์„ ํƒ์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋น„๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ ์ธ ์–ต์ œ์ œ์ด๋‚˜ ์ทŒ๋„์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ธํฌ ์‚ฌ๋ฉธ์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ธ์Š๋ฆฐ์„ ๋ถ„๋น„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ทŒ๋„ ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์ธ HIT-T15 ์„ธํฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, MPA๊ฐ€ ์„ธํฌ ์‚ฌ๋ฉธ์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ „์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ๋Š” American Type Culture Collection์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ 10% fetal bovine serum์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ RPMI-1640์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฐ์–‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธํฌ ํ™œ์„ฑ์€ methylthiazoletetrazolium (MTT) assay, ์„ธํฌ ์‚ฌ๋ฉธ์€ annexin V์™€ PI ์—ผ์ƒ‰๋ฒ•, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”์™€ caspase-3 ๋ถ„์ ˆ์€ Western blot ๋ถ„์„์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ: MPA 1ฮผM๊ณผ 10ฮผM์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ MTT, caspase-3 ๋ถ„์ ˆ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  annexin V ์—ผ์ƒ‰์ด 24์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋†๋„ ์˜์กด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์™ธ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํˆฌ์—ฌํ•œ guanosine 500ฮผM์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํšŒ๋ณต๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ adenosine 500ฮผM ํˆฌ์—ฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ MPA๋Š” extracellular-regulated protein kinase (ERK), p38 MAPK ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  c-jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK)์˜ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋ฅผ 8์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ 24์‹œ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผฐ๊ณ  guanosine ํˆฌ์—ฌ๋Š” ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํšŒ๋ณต์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ERK์˜ ์–ต์ œ์ œ์ธ PD98059, p38 MAPK ์–ต์ œ์ œ์ธ SB203580 ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  JNK ์–ต์ œ์ œ์ธ SP600125๋Š” MPA์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ๊ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋œ MAPK ํ™œ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ์ง€๋งŒ MTT์™€ caspase-3 ๋ถ„์ ˆ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ PD98059๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์—†์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ SB203580์€ ์„ธํฌ์‚ฌ๋ฉธ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผฐ๊ณ , SP600125๋งŒ์ด MPA๊ฐ€ ์ผ์œผํ‚จ ์„ธํฌ ์‚ฌ๋ฉธ์„ ์ผ๋ถ€ ํ™˜์›์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. Pan-caspase ์–ต์ œ์ œ์ธ Z-VAD-FMK ๋˜ํ•œ ์„ธํฌ ์‚ฌ๋ฉธ์„ ํ™˜์›์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก : MPA๋Š” MAPK ํ™œ์„ฑ์„ IMPDH ์˜์กด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค์ง€๋งŒ, ERKl์™€ p38 MAPK์™€๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์ด, JNK ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ caspase-3 ์ฆ๊ฐ€์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋กœ ์ทŒ๋„ ์„ธํฌ ์‚ฌ๋ฉธ์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•จ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.ope

    The Efficacy of Pre-transplant Radiologic Evaluation for Graft Volume and Anatomy in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

    Get PDF
    Purpose: For securing donor safety in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), we must know the anatomy of hepatobiliary and vascular structures as well as donor-recipient hepatic volume profile. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the role of donor-recipient evaluation by using pre-operative radiologic studies. Methods: Prospective pre-operative analyses of 94 LDLT candidate pairs (74 recipients and 94 donors) were performed. Tomographic images were reconstructed by 3-dimensional images and used as a resource of calculation of liver volume profile and anatomic structure evaluation. Results: The percentage of anatomical variation in portal, hepatic vein, hepatic artery and bile duct were 20.2, 41.5, 21.3 and 33.0%, respectively. Among 94 cases, 52 (55.4%) potential donors were unacceptable for LDLT due to a various reasons. The leading cause of unacceptability of donor was anatomical variation (n=24, 25.5%) such as anatomical variation of middle hepatic vein drainage patterns (n=20, 21.3%). Too small residual volume of donor (n=17, 18.1%) and ``small-for-size`` (n=5, 5.3%) were also considered criticalcauses of unacceptable donor. Only 19 out of 94 cases underwent successful 128 living donor right hepatic lobe transplantation. Conclusion: Pre-transplant evaluations of liver volume and anatomic structure by using three-dimensional imaging study and computerized volume measurement system is useful for performing safe LDLT.ope

    Feasibility of a Laparoscopic Approach for Generalized Peritonitis from Perforated Appendicitis in Children

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility of a laparoscopic approach in children with generalized peritonitis secondary to perforated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with drainage for generalized peritonitis secondary to perforated appendicitis at our hospital between September 2001 and April 2012. Laparoscopic outcomes were compared with outcomes of an open method for perforated appendicitis. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for generalized peritonitis from perforated appendicitis, and 87 patients underwent open appendectomy (OA) for perforated appendicitis. Wound infection was more common in the OA group (12.6%) than in the LA group (4.0%; p=0.032). The incidence of intestinal obstruction during long-term follow-up was significantly higher in the OA group (4.6% vs. 0.0% in the LA group; p=0.046). LA was possible in most patients for whom LA was attempted, with a conversion rate of 10.8%. Conversion to OA was affected by the preoperative duration of symptoms and the occurrence of intraoperative complications. CONCLUSION: LA is feasible for use in children with generalized peritonitis from perforated appendicitis, with reasonable open conversion and perioperative complication rates comparable to those of the OA group.ope

    ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ๊ตฌ์ถ•

    Get PDF
    ์žฅ๊ธฐ๋“ฑ ์ด์‹์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋ฒ•๋ฅ ์ด ์‹œํ–‰๋œ ์ดํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ๊ฑด์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ ์ฐจ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ์ถ”์„ธ์— ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ด์‹๊ฑด์ˆ˜์˜ ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ๊ตฌ์ถ•์€ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹์˜ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ ๋ฐ ์‹ค์ œ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ์„ฑ์ ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ์„œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œํ–‰๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ œ์ž„์— ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ด์‹๊ด€๋ จ ์ž๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ, ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋ฒ”์œ„ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์ด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ, ์–‘์‹ ๋ฐ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ˜•์‹์„ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋Š” ์ „๊ตญ์—์„œ ์‹œํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹๊ฑด์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์‹ ์ „, ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ๋ฐ ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์ž๋ฃŒ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์ž๋ฃŒ์—๋Š” ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹์˜ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ, ์ด์‹์ •๋ณด ๋ฐ ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ๋‹ค. ์žฅ๊ธฐ๋ณ„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์‹ ์žฅ์ด 102๊ฐœ, ์ทŒ์žฅ์ด 87๊ฐœ, ๊ฐ„์žฅ์ด 149๊ฐœ, ์‹ฌ์žฅ์ด 10๊ฐœ ๋ฐ ํ์žฅ์ด 96๊ฐœ๋กœ, โ‘  ์ด์‹์ •๋ณด, โ‘ก ์ˆ˜์—ฌ์ž ์ •๋ณด, โ‘ข ๊ณต์—ฌ์ž ์ •๋ณด, โ‘ฃ ๋ฉด์—ญ์–ต์ œ์ œ, โ‘ค ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ - ์ƒ์กด์œจ, ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ •๋ณด, ๊ธ‰์„ฑ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€๋ฐ˜์‘, ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ, ๋งŒ์„ฑ์งˆํ™˜ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ KONOS์˜ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๋นˆ๋„๋ฅผ ์šฐ์„ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๋˜, ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋กœ์„œ ํ™œ์šฉ๋„์™€ ํ•™์ˆ ์ ์ธ ์š”๊ตฌ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋Š” ์ „๊ตญ๋‹จ์œ„์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ๊ณผ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ด์‹๊ด€๋ จ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹์— ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ์ž๋ฃŒ, ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ์„ฑ์ ์ž๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„์ž๋ฃŒ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ณผ์ œ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์€ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ํ™˜์ž ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ๋…ผ๋ฆฌ์  ์„ค๊ณ„์— ํ•ด๋‹น๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ์žฅ๊ธฐ๋ณ„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ๊ณผ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ๋‹น ์ด๋ฆ„, ๋‚ด์šฉ, ์ •์˜, KONOS์ž๋ฃŒ์™€์˜ ์ค‘๋ณต์—ฌ๋ถ€, ํ†ต๊ณ„๋ถ„์„์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ทœ์ •๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ๊ตฌ์ถ•์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ โ‘  ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์˜ ์„ ์ •, โ‘ก ์„ ์ •๋œ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์˜ ๊ธฐ์กด KONOS ์ž๋ฃŒ์™€์˜ ์ค‘๋ณต ์—ฌ๋ถ€, โ‘ข ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ ๋ฐ ์ •์˜, โ‘ฃ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์˜ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ ๋ฐ ๊ทœ์ •, โ‘ค ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์˜ ์‘์šฉ, โ‘ฅ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ ๋“ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค.ope

    Second serial transverse enteroplasty procedure in an infant with extreme short bowel syndrome

    Get PDF
    The serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP) procedure is a novel technique to lengthen and taper the bowel in patients with short bowel syndrome. The advantages of STEP include not only technical ease and simplicity, but also the ability to repeat the procedure. Herein, we report a case of extreme short bowel syndrome that was successfully treated by the second STEP procedure. A 3-day old newborn girl underwent STEP because of jejunal atresia with the small bowel length of 15 cm, but her bowel elongation was not enough to escape from short bowel syndrome. At the age of 6 months, she underwent a second STEP procedure. The bowel lengthening by the second STEP made her tolerable to enteral feeding with body weight gain and rescued her from short bowel syndrome. This case showed that second STEP is very helpful in treatment of extreme short bowel syndrome.ope
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore