200 research outputs found

    항체동정검사상 λ²”μ‘μ§‘λ°˜μ‘μ„ 보인 ν™˜μžμ—μ„œ μ΅œμ†Œλ°˜μ‘κ°•λ„ 적혈ꡬ제제의 수혈 효과

    Get PDF
    Background:In patients who had serum autoantibody that reacted with all screening red blood cells (panagglutination), waiting for compatible blood is likely to delay a needed transfusion. In some cases of severely diminished hemoglobin counts, the least incompatible blood may be transfused. However, the least incompatible transfusion therapy is challenged by the presence of unexpected antibody in patient's serum, which may cause a transfusion reaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the least incompatible transfusion on clinical outcomes in patients with panagglutination. Methods:We conducted a retrospective study of 49 patients with panagglutination on an unexpected antibody screening test between January 2006 and July 2010. In 36 patients having the least incompatible blood transfusion, changes in hemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase (LD) values before and after transfusion were analyzed. One year mortality after initial need for transfusion was documented. Results:In all 36 patients who underwent transfusion, hemoglobin values showed an increase of 1.2 (0.0∼3.0) g/dL per unit without occurrence of acute transfusion reactions indicated by an increase in the LD level. The least incompatible transfusion did not show an association with increased all-cause mortality. Conclusion:As an alternative to the time consuming process of alloantibody detection, patients with severe anemia can be effectively transfused with "least incompatible units" in an emergency clinical setting without experiencing acute transfusion reactions.ope

    Serious Adverse Transfusion Reactions Reported in the National Recipient-Triggered Trace Back System in Korea (2006-2014).

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) are clinically relevant to patients with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to review the cases of ATR reported in the recipient-triggered trace back system for a recent nine-year period in Korea. METHODS: Nine-year data obtained from 2006 to 2014 by the trace back system at the Division of Human Blood Safety Surveillance of the Korean Centers for Disease Control (KCDC) were reviewed. The suspected cases were assessed according to six categories: (i) related to, (ii) probably related to, (iii) probably not related to, (iv) not related to transfusion, (v) unable to investigate, and (vi) under investigation. RESULTS: Since 2006, 199 suspected serious ATRs were reported in hospitals and medical institutions in Korea, and these ATRs were reassessed by the division of Human Blood Safety Surveillance of the KCDC. Among the reported 193 cases as transfusion related infections, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (135, 67.8%) was reported most frequently, followed by hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (27, 13.6%), HIV infection (13, 6.5%), syphilis (9, 4.5%), malarial infection (4, 2.0%), other bacterial infections (3, 1.5%), HTLV infection (1, 0.5%), and scrub typhus infection (1, 0.5%), respectively. Of the 199 cases, 13 (6.5%) cases were confirmed as transfusion-related (3 HCV infections, 3 malarial infections, 1 HBV infection, 2 Staphylococcus aureus sepsis, 3 transfusion-related acute lung injuries, and 1 hemolytic transfusion reaction). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first nationwide data regarding serious ATRs in Korea and could contribute to the implementation of an effective hemovigilance system.ope

    Report on the Project for Establishment of the Standardized Korean Laboratory Terminology Database, 2015

    Get PDF
    The National Health Information Standards Committee was established in 2004 in Korea. The practical subcommittee for laboratory test terminology was placed in charge of standardizing laboratory medicine terminology in Korean. We aimed to establish a standardized Korean laboratory terminology database, Korea-Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes (K-LOINC) based on former products sponsored by this committee. The primary product was revised based on the opinions of specialists. Next, we mapped the electronic data interchange (EDI) codes that were revised in 2014, to the corresponding K-LOINC. We established a database of synonyms, including the laboratory codes of three reference laboratories and four tertiary hospitals in Korea. Furthermore, we supplemented the clinical microbiology section of K-LOINC using an alternative mapping strategy. We investigated other systems that utilize laboratory codes in order to investigate the compatibility of K-LOINC with statistical standards for a number of tests. A total of 48,990 laboratory codes were adopted (21,539 new and 16,330 revised). All of the LOINC synonyms were translated into Korean, and 39,347 Korean synonyms were added. Moreover, 21,773 synonyms were added from reference laboratories and tertiary hospitals. Alternative strategies were established for mapping within the microbiology domain. When we applied these to a smaller hospital, the mapping rate was successfully increased. Finally, we confirmed K-LOINC compatibility with other statistical standards, including a newly proposed EDI code system. This project successfully established an up-to-date standardized Korean laboratory terminology database, as well as an updated EDI mapping to facilitate the introduction of standard terminology into institutions.ope

    μ§€λ°°Β·μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ—μ„œμ˜ μ£Όμ£Ό 이읡 λ³΄ν˜Έμ— κ΄€ν•œ 비ꡐ법적 연ꡬ

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (박사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› λ²•κ³ΌλŒ€ν•™ 법학과, 2017. 8. 솑μ˜₯λ ¬.μ—¬λŸ¬ νšŒμ‚¬κ°€ 기업집단을 이루어 운영되고 μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 기업집단이 ν•˜λ‚˜μ˜ 경제적 행동 λ‹¨μœ„λ‘œ μΈμ‹λ˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 것이 세계적 좔세이고, μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌλ„ μ˜ˆμ™ΈλŠ” μ•„λ‹ˆλ‹€. 기업집단 μ°¨μ›μ˜ μ˜μ‚¬κ²°μ •μ΄ 이루어지면, κ·Έ κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ 기업집단 특유의 λ¬Έμ œκ°€ λ°œμƒν•˜κ³ , 그에 따라 λ³΄ν˜Έλ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•˜λŠ” 기업집단 λ‚΄ μ΄ν•΄κ΄€κ³„μžλ“€μ˜ 이읡도 달라진닀. λ”°λΌμ„œ κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ 이해관계λ₯Ό μ μ ˆν•˜κ²Œ μ‘°μ ˆν•˜λŠ” 것이 νšŒμ‚¬λ²•μƒ μ€‘μš”ν•œ κ³Όμ œκ°€ λœλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ ν•œκ΅­ 상법은 λ…λ¦½ν•œ 법인격을 가진 κ°œλ³„ νšŒμ‚¬λ₯Ό λ‹¨μœ„λ‘œ 법λ₯ κ΄€κ³„λ₯Ό μ •ν•˜κ³  있고, λͺ‡λͺ‡ 쑰문을 μ œμ™Έν•˜κ³ λŠ” 기업집단에 κ΄€ν•œ κ·œμ •μ„ 두고 μžˆμ§€ μ•Šλ‹€. ν•œκ΅­ 법원도 기업집단 λ‹¨μœ„μ—μ„œ 이루어진 μ˜μ‚¬κ²°μ •μ΄λΌλ„ κ°œλ³„ νšŒμ‚¬λ₯Ό λ‹¨μœ„λ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬ 법적 νŒλ‹¨μ„ ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 싀정이닀. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ ν˜„μ‹€μ—μ„œλŠ” 기업집단 λ‚΄μ—μ„œ λ°œμƒν•˜λŠ” λ¬Έμ œλ“€μ— λŒ€ν•œ 합리적인 λŒ€μ²˜λ₯Ό ν•˜κΈ° νž˜λ“€κ³ , κ²°κ΅­ μ΄ν•΄κ΄€κ³„μžλ“€μ˜ 이읡을 μ œλŒ€λ‘œ λ³΄ν˜Έν•˜κΈ° μ–΄λ ΅κ²Œ λœλ‹€. λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” 기업집단을 λ°”λΌλ³΄λŠ” ν˜„ν–‰ 상법과 λ²•μ›μ˜ νƒœλ„λŠ” κ·Ήλ³΅λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό 함을 μ£Όμž₯ν•œλ‹€. 기업집단에 λŒ€ν•œ μ΄λ…ν˜•μœΌλ‘œμ„œ ν•˜λ‚˜μ˜ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ™€ 이 νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ κ²½μ˜μ„ μ§€λ°°ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” ν•˜λ‚˜μ˜ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬λ₯Ό μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬, 지배·쒅속관계에 μžˆλŠ” νšŒμ‚¬λ“€μ˜ 법λ₯ κ΄€κ³„λŠ” κ°œλ³„ νšŒμ‚¬μ—μ„œμ˜ 법λ₯ κ΄€κ³„μ™€λŠ” λ‹€λ₯΄λ‹€λŠ” 점을 κ³ μ°°ν•œλ‹€. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 및 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ£Όμ£Ό 이읡 보호의 κ΄€μ μ—μ„œ, μ§€λ°°Β·μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μš΄μ˜κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ λ°œμƒν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 특유의 μŸμ λ“€μ΄ 무엇인지 μ°Ύμ•„λ‚΄μ–΄ 이λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³ , 비ꡐ법적 고찰을 ν†΅ν•œ 해결책을 κ°•κ΅¬ν•œλ‹€. 이 κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ κΈ°μ‘΄ νšŒμ‚¬λ²•μ— λŒ€ν•œ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 해석둠 λ˜λŠ” μž…λ²•λ‘ μ„ μ œμ‹œν•œλ‹€. 문제 상황은 크게 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 이사에 μ˜ν•œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ κ°€μΉ˜ κ°μ†Œ ν–‰μœ„κ°€ 1) μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬λ‚˜ 그룹이읡의 좔ꡬ와 λ¬΄κ΄€ν•˜κ²Œ 이루어진 κ²½μš°μ™€ 2) μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬λ‚˜ 그룹의 이읡을 μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ 이루어진 경우둜 λ‚˜λˆ„μ–΄ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³Έλ‹€. 1)의 상황은 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ κ°€μΉ˜ κ°μ†Œκ°€ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ κ°€μΉ˜ κ°μ†Œλ‘œ μ΄μ–΄μ§ˆ 수 μžˆμœΌλ―€λ‘œ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Όλ“€μ˜ 이읡에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” ν–‰μœ„κ°€ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œλ„ λ°œμƒν•  수 μžˆμŒμ„ μ˜λ―Έν•œλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ κ°€μΉ˜ κ°μ†Œ λ°©μ§€λ‚˜ 회볡 등을 톡해 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Όλ₯Ό λ³΄ν˜Έν•  ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆμŒμ„ ν”Όλ ₯ν•œλ‹€. κ·Έ λ°©μ•ˆμ€ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬κ°€ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•΄ κ°€μ§€λŠ” 일반 μ£Όμ£Όλ‘œμ„œ 뿐 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ§€λ°°μ£Όμ£Όλ‘œμ„œ κ°€μ§€λŠ” ꢌ리λ₯Ό ν–‰μ‚¬ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œ 법인격이 λ‹€λ₯Έ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ 관리와 μš΄μ˜μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ κ΄€μ—¬ν•˜λŠ” ꡬ쑰λ₯Ό λ§Œλ“œλŠ” 것이닀. κ΅¬μ²΄μ μœΌλ‘œλŠ” β…°) μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ—κ²Œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ°œμž…ν•˜μ—¬ 관리감독할 의무λ₯Ό λΆ€λ‹΄ν•˜λ„λ‘ ν•˜λŠ” 방법과 β…±) μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Όμ—κ²Œ 직접 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ΄€μ—¬ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” κΆŒν•œμ„ λΆ€μ—¬ν•˜λŠ” λ°©λ²•μœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œλ‹€. β…°) μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ—…λ¬΄μ§‘ν–‰μžλ‘œμ„œ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬λŠ” μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬κ°€ λ³΄μœ ν•˜λŠ” μžμ‚°μ„ ν™œμš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ κ°€μΉ˜λ₯Ό κ·ΉλŒ€ν™”ν•  μ˜λ¬΄κ°€ μžˆλŠ”λ°, μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ 주식도 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μžμ‚°μ΄λ―€λ‘œ, μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬λŠ” μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 주식을 ν™œμš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ κ°€μΉ˜λ₯Ό κ·ΉλŒ€ν™”ν•  의무λ₯Ό μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 주주에 λŒ€ν•œ μ„ κ΄€μ£Όμ˜μ˜λ¬΄λ‘œμ„œ λΆ€λ‹΄ν•œλ‹€. μ΄λ•Œ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬λŠ” μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ 주식에 λΆ€μ°©λœ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ 법λ₯ μƒ 주주ꢌ 뿐 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬κ°€ μ§€λ°°μ£Όμ£Όλ‘œμ„œ κ°€μ§€λŠ” 사싀상 지배적 영ν–₯λ ₯ λ“± λͺ¨λ“  것을 ν™œμš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ κ°€μΉ˜ κ·ΉλŒ€ν™”λ₯Ό μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ ν–‰μœ„ν•˜μ—¬μ•Όν•  μ˜λ¬΄κ°€ μžˆλ‹€κ³  ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ κ΄€λ¦¬κ°λ…μ˜λ¬΄λ₯Ό λ„μΆœν•œλ‹€. μ•„μšΈλŸ¬ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ κ΄€λ¦¬κ°λ…μ˜λ¬΄ μ΄ν–‰μˆ˜λ‹¨μœΌλ‘œμ„œ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ—κ²Œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ§€μ‹œκΆŒ, μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ΄€ν•œ μ •λ³΄μˆ˜μ§‘κΆŒμ„ 인정할 ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆμŒμ„ μ£Όμž₯ν•œλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κΆŒν•œμ€ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬κ°€ μ§€λ°°μ£Όμ£Όλ‘œμ„œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•΄ κ°€μ§€λŠ” κΆŒλ¦¬λ‘œλΆ€ν„° λ‚˜μ˜€κ³ , μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 이사λ₯Ό κ΅¬μ†ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 법적인 κ·Όκ±°κ°€ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” 것을 λͺ…ν™•νžˆ ν•œλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ κ΄€λ¦¬κ°λ…μ˜λ¬΄ 이행 μ—¬λΆ€λ₯Ό κ°μ‹œΒ·κ°λ…ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ μˆ˜λ‹¨μœΌλ‘œμ„œ 상법 제412쑰의5에 κ·œμ •λœ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ κ°μ‚¬μ˜ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ‘°μ‚¬κΆŒμ˜ ν™œμš©λ°©μ•ˆλ„ ν•¨κ»˜ κ²€ν† ν•œλ‹€. β…±) 법인격 λ…λ¦½μ˜ 원칙에 λ”°λ₯΄λ©΄, μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ—μ„œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ κ°€μΉ˜ κ°μ†Œ ν–‰μœ„κ°€ 이루어지더라도 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£ΌλŠ” μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ£Όμ£Όκ°€ μ•„λ‹ˆλ―€λ‘œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ΄€ν•œ μ˜μ‚¬κ²°μ •μ— κ΄€μ—¬ν•˜κ±°λ‚˜ μ†ν•΄νšŒλ³΅μ„ μœ„ν•œ 쑰치λ₯Ό μ·¨ν•  수 μ—†λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 이사듀이 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ κ΄€λ¦¬κ°λ…μ˜λ¬΄μ˜ 이행을 κ²Œμ„λ¦¬ ν•˜κ±°λ‚˜ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 주주의 μ΄μ΅κ³ΌλŠ” λ¬΄κ΄€ν•˜κ²Œ ν–‰μœ„ν•˜λŠ” κ²½μš°μ—λŠ” μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 주주의 이읡 보호λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Όμ—κ²Œ 직접 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ΄€μ—¬ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” κΆŒν•œμ„ λΆ€μ—¬ν•˜μ—¬μ•Ό 함을 μ£Όμž₯ν•œλ‹€. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 주주의 κΆŒν•œμ„ 법인격이 λ‹€λ₯Έ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ ν™•λŒ€μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλŠ” 것은 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ ν˜„κΈˆνλ¦„μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ‹€μ§ˆμ μΈ 이해관계λ₯Ό κ°€μ§€λŠ” μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Όκ°€ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ 이읡을 κ·ΉλŒ€ν™”ν•  μΈμ„Όν‹°λΈŒλ₯Ό 가지고 μžˆμœΌλ―€λ‘œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ΄€ν•œ 업무집행에 μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜κ³  감독할 수 μžˆλŠ” κΆŒν•œμ„ κ°€μ§„λ‹€λŠ” 논리이닀. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬κ°€ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•΄ κ°€μ§€λŠ” ꢌ리 쀑 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ€‘μš”ν•œ 사항에 κ΄€ν•œ μ˜μ‚¬κ²°μ •κΆŒ, λŒ€ν‘œμ†Œμ†‘μ œκΈ°κΆŒ, νšŒκ³„μž₯λΆ€μ—΄λžŒμ²­κ΅¬κΆŒμ΄ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Όμ—κ²Œ 직접 μΈμ •λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό 함을 μ£Όμž₯ν•˜κ³ , 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ μž…λ²•λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ œμ‹œν•œλ‹€. 2)의 상황은 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 이사가 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ μ§€μ‹œμ— 따라 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ λ˜λŠ” κ·Έλ£Ή μ „μ²΄μ˜ 이읡을 μœ„ν•΄ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λΆˆμ΄μ΅ν•œ ν–‰μœ„λ₯Ό ν•œ κ²½μš°μ™€ 같이 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬λ‚˜ 그룹의 이읡을 μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Όμ˜ 이읡이 μΉ¨ν•΄λ˜λŠ” 상황을 μ˜λ―Έν•œλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ 이 경우 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Ό 이읡 보호의 κ΄€μ μ—μ„œ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 이사, μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 이사 및 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ˜λ¬΄μ™€ μ±…μž„μ„ κ³ μ°°ν•œλ‹€. μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬λŠ” μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ΄μ΅λ§Œμ„ 좔ꡬ해야 함에도 κ·Έλ£Ήμ΄μ΅μΆ”κ΅¬ν–‰μœ„λ₯Ό ν•œ 경우 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ„ κ΄€μ£Όμ˜μ˜λ¬΄Β·μΆ©μ‹€μ˜λ¬΄ μœ„λ°˜μœΌλ‘œ μ†ν•΄λ°°μƒμ±…μž„μ„ λΆ€λ‹΄ν•˜μ—¬μ•Ό 함을 ν™•μΈν•œλ‹€. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 이사 및 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬λŠ” μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬λ‚˜ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Όμ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ 의무λ₯Ό λΆ€λ‹΄ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šλ”λΌλ„ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ 의무 μœ„λ°˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ κ΅μ‚¬Β·λ°©μ‘°μ˜ μ±…μž„μ€ μΈμ •λœλ‹€. 이처럼 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Όμ— λŒ€ν•œ μ±…μž„μ˜ 주체λ₯Ό 법인격이 λ‹€λ₯Έ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬λ‚˜ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬λ‘œ ν™•μž₯μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλŠ” κ·Όκ±°λ₯Ό 비ꡐ법적 κ²€ν† λ₯Ό 톡해 κ³ μ°°ν•˜κ³ , 상법 401쑰의2 μ—…λ¬΄μ§‘ν–‰μ§€μ‹œμž λ“±μ˜ μ±…μž„ κ·œμ •μ΄ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κΈ°λŠ₯을 μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜μ—¬ 지배에 λ”°λ₯Έ μ±…μž„μ„ λΆ€κ³Όν•˜κ³  μžˆμŒμ„ ν™•μΈν•œ ν›„, 이 κ·œμ •μ˜ 적극적인 ν™œμš©μ„ μœ„ν•œ κ°œμ •λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ œμ‹œν•œλ‹€. ν•œνŽΈ, μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— 손해가 λ‚˜λ”λΌλ„ μž₯기적인 κ΄€μ μ—μ„œ 봀을 λ•ŒλŠ” μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ λ˜λŠ” κ·Έλ£Ή μ „μ²΄μ˜ 이읡을 μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” 것이 효율적인 κ²½μš°κ°€ μžˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ²½μš°μ— ν•΄λ‹Ήν•˜λŠ” 거래의 μœ ν˜•λ“€μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³ , μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ™€ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬κ°€ κ·Έ μœ ν˜•μ— ν•΄λ‹Ήν•˜λŠ” 거래λ₯Ό ν•˜λŠ” κ²½μš°μ—λŠ” 그룹의 싀체λ₯Ό μΈμ •ν•˜μ—¬ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 이사가 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 이사에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ κ·Έλ£Ή μ „μ²΄μ˜ 이읡을 μœ„ν•œ λΆˆμ΄μ΅ν•œ μ§€μ‹œλ₯Ό ν•  수 μžˆμŒμ„ μ£Όμž₯ν•œλ‹€. 법적 ν˜•μ‹μ— ꡬ애 받지 μ•Šκ³  경제적 μ‹€μ§ˆμ„ κ³ λ €ν•œ 그룹이읡 κ°œλ…μ„ μΈμ •ν•˜μžλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ 졜근 유럽의 λ§Žμ€ λ‚˜λΌλ“€μ΄ νŒλ‘€ λ˜λŠ” μž…λ²•μ„ 톡해 이λ₯Ό μΈμ •ν•˜κ³  μžˆκΈ°λ„ ν•˜λ‹€. λ‹€λ§Œ, κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ 거래 μœ ν˜•μ— μ†ν•˜κΈ°λ§Œ ν•˜λ©΄ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 및 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ κ·Έλ£Ήμ΄μ΅μΆ”κ΅¬ν–‰μœ„μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ±…μž„μ΄ μ„±λ¦½λ˜μ§€ μ•ŠλŠ” 것이 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ, μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ™€ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬κ°€ 완전지배·쒅속관계에 μžˆλŠ” λ“± μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Όλ₯Ό λ³΄ν˜Έν•  ν•„μš”κ°€ μ—†κ±°λ‚˜ 보상 λ“± μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Όλ₯Ό λ³΄ν˜Έν•  λ‹€λ₯Έ μž₯μΉ˜κ°€ λ§ˆλ ¨λ˜μ–΄ μžˆλŠ” κ²½μš°μ— ν•œν•˜μ—¬ 그룹이읡의 항변이 μΈμ •λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό 함을 κ°•μ‘°ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 그리고 μ΄λŠ” μž…λ²•μ„ 톡해 κ·Έ μš”κ±΄μ„ λͺ…ν™•νžˆ ν•  것을 μ£Όμž₯ν•œλ‹€. 특히 그룹이읡의 항변이 μ§€λ°°μ£Όμ£Όμ˜ 사읡 좔ꡬλ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ κ±°λž˜μ— μ μš©λ˜λŠ” 일이 없도둝, ν•­λ³€ μš”κ±΄μ˜ 좩쑱여뢀에 λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλ„ μ—„κ²©ν•œ 심사가 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” 언급도 μžŠμ§€ μ•ŠλŠ”λ‹€.제1μž₯ μ„œλ‘  1 제1절 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ°°κ²½ 및 λͺ©μ  1 제2절 연ꡬ 방법과 연ꡬ λ²”μœ„ 3 제3절 연ꡬ λ‚΄μš© 4 제2μž₯ 기초적 κ³ μ°° 9 제1절 λ…Όμ˜μ˜ μ „μ œλ‘œμ„œ 기업집단 9 β… . κΈ°μ—…μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ μ •μ˜ 9 1. μ œμ •λ²•μƒ κΈ°μ—…μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ μ •μ˜ 9 2. 강학상 κΈ°μ—…μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ μ •μ˜ 9 β…‘. 기업집단 ν˜•μ„± λ°°κ²½ 10 β…’. ν•œκ΅­ κΈ°μ—…μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ ν˜„μ‹€ 13 1. λ³΄νŽΈν™”λœ 기업집단 λ‹¨μœ„μ˜ 사업 μˆ˜ν–‰ 및 μ§€μ£ΌνšŒμ‚¬μ˜ 증가 13 2. 높은 λ‚΄λΆ€κ±°λž˜λΉ„μ€‘ 18 3. ν˜•μ‚¬μ±…μž„μ— μ˜ν•œ ν•΄κ²° 21 제2절 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬Β·μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ 의의 23 β… . κ°œκ΄€ 23 β…‘. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬Β·μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ •μ˜ 23 1. μ§€λ°°Β·μ’…μ†κ΄€κ³„μ˜ κΈ°μ€€ 23 2. 비ꡐ법적 κ³ μ°° 24 3. ν•œκ΅­ 33 β…’. λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ λ…Όμ˜ λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œμ„œ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬Β·μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 36 1. ν˜„ν–‰λ²•μƒ 지배·쒅속 κ°œλ… 적용의 ν•œκ³„ 36 2. λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ μ •μ˜ 40 제3절 각ꡭ의 μ§€λ°°Β·μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬λ²•μ œ 41 β… . μ„œ 41 β…‘. μ§€λ°°Β·μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ΄€ν•œ μž…λ²• 방식 41 1. 포괄적 μž…λ²• 41 2. 뢀뢄적 μž…λ²• 43 3. νŒλ‘€λ²•μ— μ˜ν•œ 규율 44 4. λ³„λ„μ˜ 규율이 μ—†λŠ” 경우 45 β…’. EU의 μ§€λ°°Β·μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ΄€ν•œ λ…Όμ˜ 46 1. 제 9μ§€μΉ¨μ•ˆ 46 2. 유럽 κ·Έλ£Ήλ²•μ œ 포럼 λ³΄κ³ μ„œ 46 3. νšŒμ‚¬λ²• μ „λ¬Έκ°€ κ·Έλ£Ή λ³΄κ³ μ„œ 49 4. EU νšŒμ‚¬λ²• λ―Έλž˜μ— κ΄€ν•œ λ³΄κ³ μ„œ 50 5. μ΄ν›„μ˜ μ›€μ§μž„ 51 β…£. κ²€ν†  51 제3μž₯ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ κ΄€λ¦¬κ°λ…μ˜λ¬΄μ™€ κΆŒν•œ 53 제1절 μ„œ 53 β… . μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Ό 보호의 ν•„μš”μ„± 54 β…‘. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Ό 보호의 λ°©μ•ˆ 54 1. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ—κ²Œ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ ꢌ리λ₯Ό 행사할 의무 λΆ€μ—¬ 54 2. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 이사가 행사할 수 μžˆλŠ” μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ ꢌ리 55 3. λ…Όμ˜μ˜ λ°©ν–₯ 57 제2절 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ κ΄€λ¦¬κ°λ…μ˜λ¬΄ 58 β… . κ°œκ΄€ 58 β…‘. 비ꡐ법적 κ³ μ°° 60 1. λ―Έκ΅­ 60 2. 독일 61 3. 일본 63 4. μ‹œμ‚¬μ  77 β…’. ν•œκ΅­ 79 1. νŒλ‘€ 79 2. ν•™μ„€ 79 3. κ²€ν†  81 제3절 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 관리감독 μˆ˜λ‹¨ 84 β… . μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ§€μ‹œκΆŒ 84 1. κ°œκ΄€ 84 2. 비ꡐ법적 κ³ μ°° 86 3. ν•œκ΅­ 91 β…‘. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ΄€ν•œ μ •λ³΄μˆ˜μ§‘κΆŒ 96 1. κ°œκ΄€ 96 2. 비ꡐ법적 κ³ μ°° 98 3. ν•œκ΅­ 105 β…’. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ κ°μ‚¬μ˜ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ‘°μ‚¬κΆŒ 107 1. κ°œκ΄€ 107 2. 비ꡐ법적 κ³ μ°° 109 3. ν•œκ΅­ 114 제4μž₯ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 주주의 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ κΆŒν•œ 118 제1절 μ„œ 118 β… . μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ 의무λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Ό 보호의 ν•œκ³„ 118 β…‘. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Ό 보호 λ°©μ•ˆ 119 1. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Όμ—κ²Œ μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ ꢌ리λ₯Ό 행사할 κΆŒν•œ λΆ€μ—¬ 119 2. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ£Όμ£Όκ°€ 행사할 수 μžˆλŠ” μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ ꢌ리 119 3. λ…Όμ˜μ˜ λ°©ν–₯ 122 제2절 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 주주의 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬μ— κ΄€ν•œ μ‚¬ν•­μ˜ 의결ꢌ 행사 123 β… . κ°œκ΄€ 123 1. 문제의 μ†Œμž¬ 123 2. ν•œκ΅­ 상법과 νŒλ‘€μ˜ νƒœλ„ 124 3. λ…Όμ˜μ˜ λ°©ν–₯ 124 β…‘. 비ꡐ법적 κ³ μ°° 125 1. λ―Έκ΅­ 125 2. 독일 131 3. 일본 137 4. μ‹œμ‚¬μ  137 β…’. ν•œκ΅­ 141 1. ν•™μ„€μ˜ κ²½ν–₯ 142 2. 인정여뢀 143 3. κ²€ν†  143 제3절 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 주주의 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ 이사에 λŒ€ν•œ μ±…μž„μΆ”κΆ 150 β… . κ°œκ΄€ 150 1. 문제의 μ†Œμž¬ 150 2. ν•œκ΅­ 상법과 λ²•μ›μ˜ νƒœλ„ 152 3. λ…Όμ˜μ˜ λ°©ν–₯ 153 β…‘. 비ꡐ법적 κ²€ν†  154 1. λ―Έκ΅­ 154 2. 독일 167 3. 일본 168 4. μ‹œμ‚¬μ  175 β…’. ν•œκ΅­ 176 1. ν•™μ„€μ˜ κ²½ν–₯ 176 2. 인정여뢀 178 3. κ²€ν†  180 제4절 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 주주의 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ •λ³΄μˆ˜μ§‘κΆŒ 193 β… . κ°œκ΄€ 193 1. 문제의 μ†Œμž¬ 193 2. ν•œκ΅­ 상법과 νŒλ‘€μ˜ νƒœλ„ 194 3. λ…Όμ˜μ˜ λ°©ν–₯ 195 β…‘. 비ꡐ법적 κ³ μ°° 196 1. λ―Έκ΅­ 196 2. 독일 201 3. 일본 202 4. μ‹œμ‚¬μ  206 β…’. ν•œκ΅­ 208 1. ν•™μ„€μ˜ κ²½ν–₯ 208 2. 인정 μ—¬λΆ€ 209 3. κ²€ν†  209 제5μž₯ μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Ό 보호 219 제1절 μ„œ 219 제2절 μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Όμ— λŒ€ν•œ μ˜λ¬΄μ™€ μ±…μž„ 221 β… . κ°œκ΄€ 221 β…‘. μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ μ˜λ¬΄μ™€ μ±…μž„ 221 1. μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ 의무 222 2. μ’…μ†νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ μ±…μž„ 224 β…’. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 이사 및 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ˜λ¬΄μ™€ μ±…μž„ 225 1. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ μ΄μ‚¬μ˜ 의무 225 2. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ 의무 227 3. μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬ 이사 및 μ§€λ°°νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ±…μž„ 235 제3절 그룹이읡 ν•­λ³€ 267 β… . κ°œκ΄€ 267 β…‘. 그룹이읡 항변을 μΈμ •ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ κ΄€ν•œ 기초적 κ³ μ°° 268 1. 그룹이읡(group interest)의 의의 269 2. κΈ°μ—…μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ 싀체에 κ΄€ν•œ μ ‘κ·Ό 방식 270 3. 그룹이읡 κ°œλ… μΈμ •μ˜ λͺ©μ  276 4. 그룹이읡 항변을 μ μš©ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 거래 μœ ν˜• 278 5. κ²€ν†  283 β…’. 비ꡐ법적 κ³ μ°° 284 1. μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Όκ°€ μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜λŠ” 경우 284 2. μ†Œμˆ˜μ£Όμ£Όκ°€ μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠλŠ” 경우 304 3. μ‹œμ‚¬μ  306 β…£. ν•œκ΅­ 309 1. ν˜„ν–‰λ²•μ˜ νƒœλ„ 309 2. ν•™μ„€κ³Ό νŒλ‘€μ˜ νƒœλ„ 310 제6μž₯ κ²°λ‘  322 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 326 Abstract 350Docto

    Geometric structures modeled after smooth projective horospherical varieties of Picard number one

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (박사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : μˆ˜λ¦¬κ³Όν•™λΆ€, 2016. 2. μž„μ„ ν¬.Geometric structures modeled after homogeneous manifolds are studied to characterize homogeneous manifolds and to prove the deformation rigidity of them. To generalize these characterizations and deformation rigidity results to quasihomogeneous manifolds, we first study horospherical varieties and geo metric structures modeled after horospherical varieties. Using Cartan geom etry, we prove that a geometric structure modeled after a smooth projective horospherical variety of Picard number one is locally equivalent to the stan dard geometric structure when the geometric structure is defined on a Fano manifold of Picard number one.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Geometric structures on filtered manifolds 6 2.1 G0-structures on filtered manifolds 6 2.2 Prolongations 9 2.3 Cartan connections 11 2.4 Examples 15 Chapter 3 Smooth horospherical varieties of Picard number one 20 3.1 G-varieties 20 3.2 Classifications 22 3.3 Lie algebras of the automorphism groups 26 3.4 Gradations 29 3.5 Varieties of minimal rational tangents 43 Chapter 4 Existence of Cartan connections 50 4.1 Prolongations 50 4.2 Existence of Cartan connections 58 4.3 Geometric structures modeled after horospherical varieties 62 Bibliography 67 ꡭ문초둝 71Docto

    Human adipose mesenchymal stem cells modulate inflammation and angiogenesis through exosomes

    Get PDF
    Stem cell-derived exosomes are efficient and safe therapeutic tools for transferring endogenous biological cargo or functional biomolecules for regenerative medicine. The regulation of inflammation and angiogenesis plays a pivotal role in wound healing and tissue regeneration. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic roles of human adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes, focusing on the underlying mechanisms. Exosomes inhibited LPS-induced inflammation by activating ROCK1 and PTEN expression. Moreover, microRNAs (miR-132 and miR-146a) released from exosomes upregulated the expression of pro-angiogenic genes and promoted proliferation activity and tube formation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Exosomal effects were verified using ROCK1/PTEN inhibitors for anti-inflammation and miR-132/miR-146a inhibitors for pro-angiogenesis. Our findings suggest that exosomes exert anti-inflammatory effects by targeting the ROCK1/PTEN pathway and exhibit pro-angiogenic effects via delivery of miR-132 and miR-146a. Taken together, these results suggest that exosomes may be promising therapeutic candidates for curing diseases involved in inflammation and angiogenesis.ope

    Survey Analysis of ABO Antibody Titration at Four University Hospitals in Korea.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The ABO antibody titration is important, especially in case of ABO-incompatible hemolytic disease of newborn, ABO-incompatible bone marrow or solid organ transplantation. However, no standard method for ABO antibody titration has yet been established. We surveyed four university hospitals about the methods of ABO antibody titration and performed inter-laboratory proficiency tests. METHODS: Detailed methods of ABO antibody titration were surveyed at four university hospitals. ABO antibody titer was measured by their customary methods using serum samples from six healthy volunteers with blood groups A (n=2), B (n=2) and O (n=2). RESULTS: Procedures of ABO antibody titration, reportable ranges, sample diluent, source of reagent RBCs and interpretation of end-point were different among four university hospitals. Inter-institutional maximum differences of IgM and IgG ABO antibody titer were 16-fold and 32-fold, respectively. CONCLUSION: Standardization of ABO antibody titration method is needed to reduce inter-laboratory variability, and a periodical external quality control survey is necessary to improve the accuracy of the titrationope

    Performance review of the National Blood Safety Improvement Project in Korea (2004-2009)

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: In 2004, the Korean government and blood transfusion community deliberated on the issue of a national blood system reform and agreed to implement a 5-year project (2004-2009) to further improve safety measures. Our study delineates the basis of the current national blood program and analyzes the performance of this 5-year project initiated by the Korean government. METHODS: A performance review of the 5-year project was conducted from May 2009 to February 2010 using various approaches. Numerous data and documentation were collected from the Korean Red Cross and the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and reviewed by experts. Approximately 20 interviews with representatives of stakeholder groups were conducted to gather information, opinions, and perceptions. We conducted a nationwide field survey on a total of 144 blood donor centers. RESULTS: Among the 5 major categories of the 5-year project, blood donor recruitment, laboratory testing, and product manufacturing were improved in terms of quality performance. Specifically, government's financial support ensured that the infrastructure of blood donor centers and blood laboratory centers improved. The pivotal role of the government contributed to improvements in the national blood program and enhanced national surveillance for blood safety. CONCLUSION: Korea has made a tremendous effort with positive outcomes to provide safety measures for blood products for transfusion in its citizens. In all areas of blood management, from blood donations to transfusions, continuous developments in monitoring safety standards and practices are paramount.ope

    A Case of Washed Platelet Transfusion in a Patient with History of Recurrent Transfusion Reaction Ji Yeon Sohn1, Joo-Hyoung Hwang1, Hyang-lae Lee1

    Get PDF
    Anaphylactic transfusion reaction is caused by deficiency of certain protein(s) in the recipient. We report on the experience of platelet count recovery using washed platelets for transfusion in a patient who developed an anaphylactic transfusion reaction. A 50-year old male diagnosed with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma was treated with chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Immediately after starting transfusion of apheresis platelets, he began sweating and complained of visual impairment, chest discomfort, and abdominal pain. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures and oxygen saturation monitored by pulse oximetry were decreased. Platelet transfusion was discontinued immediately and hydrocortisone was administered, and the symptoms and signs were resolved within two hours. Laboratory test using post-transfusion blood showed no apparent evidence of hemolysis. Platelet washing procedure using normal saline three times was newly set to prevent anaphylactic reaction in the patient. Transfusions of washed platelets were performed 20 times for 60 days, and the patient showed no anaphylactic reaction during this period. He showed no evidence of immunoglobulin A, haptoglobin, C3, or C4 deficiencies. We confirmed that washed platelet transfusion is highly effective for prevention of anaphylactic transfusion reaction.ope
    • …
    corecore