Industry use of evidence to influence alcohol policy: a case study of submissions to the 2008 Scottish government consultation.

Jim McCambridge and colleagues analyze industry submissions to a Scottish Government consultation on whole-population approaches to alcohol policy

The Impact of asking about interest in free nicotine patches on smoker's stated intent to change: real effect or artefact of question ordering?

INTRODUCTION Stage of change questions are often included on general population surveys to assess the proportion of current smokers intending to quit. The current study reported on a methodological experiment to establish whether participant's self-reported stage of change can be influenced by asking about interest in free nicotine patches immediately prior to asking about intent to change. METHODS As part of an ongoing random digit dialing survey, a randomized half of participants were asked if they would be interested in receiving nicotine patches to help them quit smoking prior to being asked whether they intended to quit smoking in the next 6 months and 30 days. RESULTS Participants who were first asked about interest in free nicotine patches were more likely to rate themselves as in preparation for change (asked first = 33%; not asked first = 19%), and less likely to rate themselves as in the precontemplation stage of change (asked first = 34%; not asked first = 47%), compared with participants who were not asked about their interest in free nicotine patches prior to being asked about their stage of change (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS There are several possible explanations of the results. It is possible that offers of free nicotine patches increases smokers intentions to quit, at least temporarily. Alternatively, smokers being asked about interest in free nicotine patches may expect that the researchers would like to hear about people intending to quit, and respond accordingly.This research is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant #: MOP 111209

Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design

BACKGROUND Employing waiting list control designs in psychological and behavioral intervention research may artificially inflate intervention effect estimates. This exploratory randomized controlled trial tested this proposition in a study employing a brief intervention for problem drinkers, one domain of research in which waiting list control designs are used. METHODS All participants (N = 185) were provided with brief personalized feedback intervention materials after being randomly allocated either to be told that they were in the intervention condition and that this was the intervention or to be told that they were in the waiting list control condition and that they would receive access to the intervention in four weeks with this information provided in the meantime. RESULTS A total of 157 participants (85%) were followed-up after 4 weeks. Between-group differences were found in one of four outcomes (proportion within safe drinking guidelines). An interaction was identified between experimental manipulation and stage of change at study entry such that participant change was arrested among those more ready to change and told they were on the waiting list. CONCLUSIONS Trials with waiting list control conditions may overestimate treatment effects, though the extent of any such bias appears likely to vary between study populations. Arguably they should only be used where this threat to valid inference has been carefully assessed.During the conduct of this research, John Cunningham was supported as the Canada Research Chair on Brief Interventions for Addictive Behaviours. Kypros Kypri is supported by a National Health & Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship (APP1041867) and a Senior Brawn Fellowship from the University of Newcastle Jim McCambridge is supported by a Wellcome Trust Research Career Development fellowship in Basic Biomedical Science (WT086516MA)

The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The concept of demand characteristics, which involves research participants being aware of what the researcher is investigating, is well known and widely used within psychology, particularly in laboratory-based studies. Studies of this phenomenon may make a useful contribution to broader consideration of the effects of taking part in research on participant behaviour. This systematic review seeks to summarise data from studies of the effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. These had to be purposely designed to evaluate possible effects of demand characteristics on at least one behavioural outcome under the autonomous control of the participants and use longitudinal study designs. Only 7 studies were included, 6 providing observational data and 1 experimental study, with 5 studies involving examination of possible effects on health behaviours. Although studies provided some evidence of effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviour, heterogeneous operationalisation of the construct, the limited number of studies and poor quality of study designs made synthesis and interpretation of study findings challenging. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although widely accepted as important in psychology, there have been few dedicated studies of the effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours outside laboratory settings. This body of literature does not currently contribute to the wider study of research participation effects. A systematic review of data from laboratory-based studies is needed, as are high-quality primary studies in non-laboratory settings. We suggest that unqualified use of the term demand characteristics should be abandoned

Art on the Brain & Vets at the Wex: Wellness at the Wexner Center for the Arts

IMPACT. 1: Participants reported an increased expansiveness in their thinking: "You pushed (my) limitations and expanded my appreciation of every aspect of our world. I now observe the world in a different light." -- 2. Participants felt supported by their new community: "I liked that each individual opened up and felt comfortable to share very private things." -- 3. Participants gained a deeper appreciation of the arts: "I now have an appreciation of all forms of arts and the complexity of all the different art mediums!"OSU PARTNERS: Wexner Center for the ArtsCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: Chalmers P. Wylie VA Ambulatory Care CenterPRIMARY CONTACT: Tracie McCambridge ([email protected])Art on the Brain, a gallery-based program created for individuals living with chronic effects of brain/mind injury, and Vets at the Wex, a similar program designed with veterans in mind, are expanding how we think about the art-gallery space. Both programs challenge participants to think deeply as they work to explore contemporary art. Group discussions push each person to see from the perspective of others, building community and new friendships along the way

An Exploration of the Growth of Moral Judgment in Eighth Grade Students Through Process Drama

Digitized thesi

Industry actors, think tanks, and alcohol policy in the United kingdom.

Corporate actors seek to influence alcohol policies through various means, including attempts to shape the evidential content of policy debates. In this case study, we examined how SABMiller engaged the think tank Demos to produce reports on binge drinking, which were heavily promoted among policymakers at crucial stages in the development of the UK government's 2012 alcohol strategy. One key report coincided with other SABMiller-funded publications, advocating measures to enhance parenting as an alternative to minimum unit pricing. In this instance, the perceived independence of an influential think tank was used to promote industry interests in tactics similar to those of transnational tobacco corporations. This approach is in keeping with other alcohol industry efforts to marginalize the peer-reviewed literature