Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Open Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Study Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective. To give a systematic overview of effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) compared with open microdiscectomy (OM) in the treatment of lumbar disk herniation (LDH). Summary of Background Data. The current standard procedure for the treatment of sciatica caused by LDH, is OM. PTED is an alternative surgical technique which is thought to be less invasive. It is unclear if PTED has comparable outcomes compared with OM. Methods. Multiple online databases were systematically searched up to April 2020 for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies comparing PTED with OM for LDH. Primary outcomes were leg pain and functional status. Pooled effect estimates were calculated for the primary outcomes only and presented as standard mean differences (SMD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) at short (1-day postoperative), intermediate (3-6 months), and long-term (12 months). Results. We identified 2276 citations, of which eventually 14 studies were included. There was substantial heterogeneity in effects on leg pain at short term. There is moderate quality evidence suggesting no difference in leg pain at intermediate (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.10-0.21) and long-term follow-up (SMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.30-0.53). Only one study measured functional status at short-term and reported no differences. There is moderate quality evidence suggesting no difference in functional status at intermediate (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.24-0.07) and long-term (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.45-0.24). Conclusion. There is moderate quality evidence suggesting no difference in leg pain or functional status at intermediate and long-term follow-up between PTED and OM in the treatment of LDH. High quality, robust studies reporting on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness on the long term are lacking.Scientific Assessment and Innovation in Neurosurgical Treatment Strategie

Spontaneous externalization of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt tip through the navel

The authors describe spontaneous externalization of a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt through the navel

The neurosurgical curriculum: Which procedures are essential?

Objective: Traditionally, neurosurgery is a competitive field. Throughout the years, the surgical armamentarium has been subject to change, e.g. due to the rise of indications for gamma knife, functional or endovascular surgery. Furthermore, due to modern day issues among residents, such as work hour restrictions (WHRs) and prevalence of burn-out, may require contemporary modifications of the neurosurgical curriculum. By the means of this cross sectional research, the current curriculum is evaluated. Methods: In September 2019, a 21-question survey was mailed to members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons using SurveyMonkey. The survey consisted out of 3 parts: demographics of the respondents, respondent‘s neurosurgical residency and opinions on essential procedures. Results: After the two reminders, 578 members responded resulting in a response rate of 7.3%. Respondents had a mean residency program of 7 years (range 3 to 12 years). Of the residents, 87.5% had a weekly WHR of 80 h per week. A minority (43.8%) felt WHRs would limit the chances of residents to master surgical techniques. Neurotraumatical procedures such as decompression of subdural (91.5%) and epidural (91.3%) hematoma‘s, ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion (86.9%), Chiari decompression (81.4%) and cervical discectomy (81.4%) were the procedures respondents mastered the most. This in contrast to endovascular procedures (67.9%), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (48.5%) and deep brain stimulation (34%), in which respondents were less proficient. Conclusions: The current study gives an evaluation of different neurosurgical curricula and aimed to identify which surgical procedures are deemed as essential by neurosurgeons worldwide. Functiona

Practice variation in the conservative and surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma

Objective: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a condition that is frequently seen in the neurological and neurosurgical practice. Surgical treatment is overall preferred; however, conservative treatment is also an option. Both surgical and conservative treatment of CSDH vary across neurosurgeons. The aim of the present study was to evaluate different treatment strategies for CSDH among neurosurgeons in different countries. Material and Methods: We designed a survey that was sent to neurosurgeons affiliated with the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.The questions were related to the conservative and surgical treatment methods of CSDH. Furthermore, we also included questions related to post-operative care. Results: 443 neurosurgeons completed the survey. 46.2 % of the respondents sometimes use dexamethasone as monotherapy. Overall, 26.2 % estimated dexamethasone to have a high efficacy on CSDH. A Glas

Safety Culture and Attitudes Among Spine Professionals: Results of an International Survey

Study Design: International survey. Objective: A positive safety culture has been linked to better surgical outcomes, less hospital costs and less patient harm and severity-adjusted mortality, making safety attitudes relevant for society and both patient and health care provider. The aim of the current study is to assess attitudes toward safety culture among spinal care professionals. Methods: An online survey was distributed to members of AOSpine International in 2016. The survey consisted out of 3 parts: (1) demographics, (2) the Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ), and (3) expectations of responsibility for improving the safety culture. The SAQ measured job satisfaction, teamwork, and safety climate, perceptions of management, stress recognition, and working conditions. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with safety attitudes. Results: A total of 356 respondents replied. The SAQ showed that respondents in Africa have a significant lower score (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, P .05). The majority expected the surgeon to be mainly responsible for improving the safety culture in the operating room and at management level. Conclusions: There was a lot of variety among different respondents worldwide albeit respondents in Africa scored significantly lower on working conditions, compared with spine professionals in Asia and North America, suggesting that wealthier countries have better working conditions which may lead toward better safety attitudes. Closer collaboration between hospital management and clinicians seems to be a target for improvement in safety culture. Furthermore, to show clinical relevance in this field, studies correlating safety attitudes with outcomes after spine surgery are warranted

Anterior cervical discectomy without fusion for a symptomatic cervical disk herniation

Background: Cervical radiculopathy is characterized by dysfunction of the nerve root usually caused by a cervical disk herniation. The most important symptom is pain, radiating from the neck to the arm. When conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment is indicated to relieve symptoms. During the last decades, multiple fusion techniques have been developed, although without clinical evidence for added value of fusion over non-fusion. Methods: The surgical procedure of anterior cervical discectomy without fusion is performed step by step, leading to removal of the entire intervertebral disk. Conclusion: Anterior cervical discectomy without fusion is a safe and effective treatment for cervical disk herniation

Authorship in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Background and Objective According to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), authorship should be offered based on fulfilling four criteria. Honorary authorship (HA) is a term used for authors enlisted who did not fulfill these criteria. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of HA in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Material and Methods In 2020, a twenty-two question survey was sent to corresponding authors of four high-impact journals in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The survey covered (1) demographics, (2) awareness of authorship guidelines and decision-making of authorship, and (3) honorary authorship. Results The response rate was 24.8%. Of the respondents, 81.1% was aware of the issue of guidelines on authorship, while 56.3% was aware of the issue of HA. Yet, 15.5% of the respondents felt that one or more of their co-authors did not deserve authorship based on the ICMJE-guidelines. Conclusion Based on the estimated proportions of HA, attempts should be made by universities, medical journals and individual researchers to further reduce authorship misuse.Scientific Assessment and Innovation in Neurosurgical Treatment Strategie

Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain:A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE: Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a minimally invasive treatment for cervical radicular pain due to a disc herniation. Preliminary results show equivalent patient-reported outcomes of PCN as compared to conventional anterior cervical discectomy. However, there is a paucity of long-term outcome data. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to investigate the long-term clinical results of PCN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent PCN at a secondary referral center between 2010 and 2014. Before surgery and five days after surgery, numeric rating scales (NRS) for arm pain and neck pain and data on complications were collected. To determine long-term follow-up outcomes, patients were sent a questionnaire booklet containing the Core Outcome Measures Index-Neck (COMI-Neck), NRS for arm pain and neck pain, Likert-scales on patient satisfaction and questions regarding the incidence of reoperations and complications. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were collected for 158 patients. At a median follow-up of 41.5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 27.0 to 57.5), data were available for 118 patients (74.7%). At short-term follow-up, patients that underwent PCN had a mean decrease of 3.0 on the NRS for arm pain (95% CI 2.5 to 3.6) compared to baseline, while at long-term follow-up, a mean decrease of 2.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.6) was observed. At the long-term follow-up, 67.8% of the patients were fully recovered from all symptoms and 93.3% remained satisfied with the PCN treatment results. The reoperation rate for recurrent disc herniation was 21.4% at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: PCN appears to be a safe and effective treatment at short-term and long-term follow-up of a specific selection of cervical herniated discs, with an acceptable long-term reoperation rate. These study results suggest a potential role of PCN as a less invasive treatment option for cervical radicular pain due to a soft disc herniation, before anterior cervical discectomy should be considered