1,425 research outputs found

    Structuur en energie in de organische chemie

    Get PDF

    Dilution refrigeration with multiple mixing chambers

    Get PDF

    Structuur en energie in de organische chemie

    Get PDF

    Tree species, crown cover, and age as determinants of the vertical distribution of airborne LiDAR returns

    Full text link
    Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) provides information on the vertical structure of forest stands enabling detailed and extensive ecosystem study. The vertical structure is often summarized by scalar features and data-reduction techniques that limit the interpretation of results. Instead, we quantified the influence of three variables, species, crown cover, and age, on the vertical distribution of airborne LiDAR returns from forest stands. We studied 5,428 regular, even-aged stands in Quebec (Canada) with five dominant species: balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.), paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh), black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP), white spruce (Picea glauca Moench) and aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). We modeled the vertical distribution against the three variables using a functional general linear model and a novel nonparametric graphical test of significance. Results indicate that LiDAR returns from aspen stands had the most uniform vertical distribution. Balsam fir and white birch distributions were similar and centered at around 50% of the stand height, and black spruce and white spruce distributions were skewed to below 30% of stand height (p<0.001). Increased crown cover concentrated the distributions around 50% of stand height. Increasing age gradually shifted the distributions higher in the stand for stands younger than 70-years, before plateauing and slowly declining at 90-120 years. Results suggest that the vertical distributions of LiDAR returns depend on the three variables studied

    Deriving pseudo-vertical waveforms from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data

    Full text link
    This is an author's accepted manuscript of an article published in “Remote Sensing Letters", Volume 5, Issue 4, 2014; copyright Taylor & Francis; available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2150704X.2014.903350[EN] When processing scanning LiDAR data, it is commonly assumed that the extracted full-waveform LiDAR pulse registers truly vertical information of forest canopies. This assumption may lead to uncertain results for the spatiotemporal analysis of the waveforms due to off-nadir scanning angles and varying trajectories travelled by the pulses in overlapping strips. In this letter, we investigate these assumptions and undertake some preliminary analysis to overcome their impacts on forest-based LiDAR analyses. Our results demonstrate that for a standard LiDAR forest acquisition programme in Oregon, USA, most of the hits (83%) are acquired off-nadir, which leads to positional displacements on the ground of the full-waveforms of about 0.20 m for each 1-m height increment. We propose an approach to synthetize multiple waveform data into composite waveforms containing the vertical profile of vegetation for a given location. This approach is based on partitioning the aboveground vertical space into voxels and using the maximum full-waveform intensity value to construct new full-waveforms comprising the vertical information of the various waveforms crossing over a location. Our initial results indicate that deriving spatiotemporal metrics from the composite pseudo-vertical full-waveforms produces a more consistent response across adjacent height levels, which in turn enables a more complete characterization and more vegetation structure to be retrieved. We conclude that this type of pseudo-vertical full-waveform analysis is necessary to more fully understand the impact of the return signals from tree crownsThis paper was developed as a result of a visiting scholar grant funded by the Erasmus Mundus Programme of the European Commission under the Transatlantic Partnership for Excellence in Engineering – TEE Project. The authors also wish to thank the Generalitat Valenciana for the mobility grant [BEST/2012/235] and the Panther Creek Remote Sensing and Research cooperative programme for the data provided for this research.Hermosilla, T.; Coops, N.; Ruiz Fernández, LÁ.; Moskal, M. (2014). Deriving pseudo-vertical waveforms from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data. Remote Sensing Letters. 5(4):332-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2014.903350S33234154Baltsavias, E. . (1999). Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(2-3), 199-214. doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(99)00015-5Blair, J. B., Rabine, D. L., & Hofton, M. A. (1999). The Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor: a medium-altitude, digitisation-only, airborne laser altimeter for mapping vegetation and topography. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(2-3), 115-122. doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(99)00002-7BOUDREAU, J., NELSON, R., MARGOLIS, H., BEAUDOIN, A., GUINDON, L., & KIMES, D. (2008). Regional aboveground forest biomass using airborne and spaceborne LiDAR in Québec. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(10), 3876-3890. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.003Bretar, F., M. Pierrot-Deseilligny, and M. Roux. 2004. “Solving the Strip Adjustment Problem of 3D Airborne Lidar Data.” IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, Anchorage, AK, September 20–24, 4734–4737.Buddenbaum, H., Seeling, S., & Hill, J. (2013). Fusion of full-waveform lidar and imaging spectroscopy remote sensing data for the characterization of forest stands. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(13), 4511-4524. doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.776721Carabajal, C. C., & Harding, D. J. (2005). ICESat validation of SRTM C-band digital elevation models. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(22), n/a-n/a. doi:10.1029/2005gl023957Drake, J. B., Dubayah, R. O., Clark, D. B., Knox, R. G., Blair, J. B., Hofton, M. A., … Prince, S. (2002). Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79(2-3), 305-319. doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00281-4Ferraz, A., G. Goncalves, P. Soares, M. Tome, C. Mallet, S. Jacquemoud, F. Bretar, and L. Pereira. 2012. “Comparing Small-footprint LiDAR and Forest Inventory Data for Single Strata Biomass Estimation – A Case Study over a Multi-layered Mediterranean Forest.” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Munich, July 22–27, 6384–6387.Hall, S. A., Burke, I. C., Box, D. O., Kaufmann, M. R., & Stoker, J. M. (2005). Estimating stand structure using discrete-return lidar: an example from low density, fire prone ponderosa pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 208(1-3), 189-209. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.12.001Harding, D. J. (2005). ICESat waveform measurements of within-footprint topographic relief and vegetation vertical structure. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(21). doi:10.1029/2005gl023471Heinzel, J., & Koch, B. (2011). Exploring full-waveform LiDAR parameters for tree species classification. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13(1), 152-160. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2010.09.010Hermosilla, T., Ruiz, L. A., Kazakova, A. N., Coops, N. C., & Moskal, L. M. (2014). Estimation of forest structure and canopy fuel parameters from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 23(2), 224. doi:10.1071/wf13086Höfle, B., Hollaus, M., & Hagenauer, J. (2012). Urban vegetation detection using radiometrically calibrated small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 67, 134-147. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.12.003HYDE, P., DUBAYAH, R., PETERSON, B., BLAIR, J., HOFTON, M., HUNSAKER, C., … WALKER, W. (2005). Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using waveform lidar: Validation of montane ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96(3-4), 427-437. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.005Kim, Y., Yang, Z., Cohen, W. B., Pflugmacher, D., Lauver, C. L., & Vankat, J. L. (2009). Distinguishing between live and dead standing tree biomass on the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, USA using small-footprint lidar data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(11), 2499-2510. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.07.010Koetz, B., Morsdorf, F., Sun, G., Ranson, K. J., Itten, K., & Allgower, B. (2006). Inversion of a Lidar Waveform Model for Forest Biophysical Parameter Estimation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 3(1), 49-53. doi:10.1109/lgrs.2005.856706Kronseder, K., Ballhorn, U., Böhm, V., & Siegert, F. (2012). Above ground biomass estimation across forest types at different degradation levels in Central Kalimantan using LiDAR data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 37-48. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2012.01.010Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Acker, S. A., Parker, G. G., Spies, T. A., & Harding, D. (1999). Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70(3), 339-361. doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(99)00052-8Lefsky, M. A., Harding, D. J., Keller, M., Cohen, W. B., Carabajal, C. C., Del Bom Espirito-Santo, F., … de Oliveira, R. (2005). Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(22), n/a-n/a. doi:10.1029/2005gl023971Mallet, C., & Bretar, F. (2009). Full-waveform topographic lidar: State-of-the-art. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64(1), 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.09.007Ni-Meister, W., Jupp, D. L. B., & Dubayah, R. (2001). Modeling lidar waveforms in heterogeneous and discrete canopies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(9), 1943-1958. doi:10.1109/36.951085Pang, Y., Lefsky, M., Sun, G., & Ranson, J. (2011). Impact of footprint diameter and off-nadir pointing on the precision of canopy height estimates from spaceborne lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(11), 2798-2809. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.025Reitberger, J., Krzystek, P., & Stilla, U. (2008). Analysis of full waveform LIDAR data for the classification of deciduous and coniferous trees. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5), 1407-1431. doi:10.1080/01431160701736448Reitberger, J., Schnörr, C., Krzystek, P., & Stilla, U. (2009). 3D segmentation of single trees exploiting full waveform LIDAR data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64(6), 561-574. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.04.002Sarrazin, M. J. D., van Aardt, J. A. N., Asner, G. P., McGlinchy, J., Messinger, D. W., & Wu, J. (2012). Fusing small-footprint waveform LiDAR and hyperspectral data for canopy-level species classification and herbaceous biomass modeling in savanna ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 37(6), 653-665. doi:10.5589/m12-007SUN, G., RANSON, K., KIMES, D., BLAIR, J., & KOVACS, K. (2008). Forest vertical structure from GLAS: An evaluation using LVIS and SRTM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(1), 107-117. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.036Van Leeuwen, M., & Nieuwenhuis, M. (2010). Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing. European Journal of Forest Research, 129(4), 749-770. doi:10.1007/s10342-010-0381-4Wu, J., van Aardt, J. A. N., McGlinchy, J., & Asner, G. P. (2012). A Robust Signal Preprocessing Chain for Small-Footprint Waveform LiDAR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(8), 3242-3255. doi:10.1109/tgrs.2011.2178420Yang, W., Ni-Meister, W., & Lee, S. (2011). Assessment of the impacts of surface topography, off-nadir pointing and vegetation structure on vegetation lidar waveforms using an extended geometric optical and radiative transfer model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(11), 2810-2822. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.02

    Characterizing understory vegetation in Mediterranean forests using full-waveform airborne laser scanning data

    Full text link
    [EN] The use of laser scanning acquired from the air, or ground, holds great potential for the assessment of forest structural attributes, beyond conventional forest inventory. The use of full-waveform airborne laser scanning (ALSFW) data allows for the extraction of detailed information in different vertical strata compared to discrete ALS (ALSD). Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) can register lower vertical strata, such as understory vegetation, without issues of canopy occlusion, however is limited in its acquisition over large areas. In this study we examine the ability of ALSFW to characterize understory vegetation (i.e. maximum and mean height, cover, and volume), verified using TLS point clouds in a Mediterranean forest in Eastern Spain. We developed nine full-waveform metrics to characterize understory vegetation attributes at two different scales (3.75¿m square subplots and circular plots with a radius of 15¿m); with, and without, application of a height filter to the data. Four understory vegetation attributes were estimated at plot level with high R2 values (mean height: R2¿=¿0.957, maximum height: R2¿=¿0.771, cover: R2¿=¿0.871, and volume: R2¿=¿0.951). The proportion of explained variance was slightly lower at 3.75¿m side cells (mean height: R2¿=¿0.633, maximum height: R2¿=¿0.470, cover: R2¿=¿0.581, and volume R2¿=¿0.651). These results indicate that Mediterranean understory vegetation can be estimated and accurately mapped over large areas with ALSFW. The future use of these types of predictions includes the estimation of ladder fuels, which drive key fire behavior in these ecosystems.This research was developed mainly in the Integrated Remote Sensing Studio (IRSS) of University of British Columbia (UBC) (Canada) as a result of the Erasmus + KA-107 mobility grant. The authors thank the financial support provided by the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad and FEDER, in the framework of the project CGL2016-80705-R.Crespo-Peremarch, P.; Tompalski, P.; Coops, N.; Ruiz Fernández, LÁ. (2018). Characterizing understory vegetation in Mediterranean forests using full-waveform airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 217:400-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.033S40041321

    Integrating Landsat pixel composites and change metrics with lidar plots to predictively map forest structure and aboveground biomass in Saskatchewan, Canada

    Get PDF
    Forest inventory and monitoring programs are needed to provide timely, spatially complete (i.e. mapped), and verifiable information to support forest management, policy formulation, and reporting obligations. Satellite images, in particular data from the Landsat Thematic Mapper and Enhanced Thematic Mapper (TM/ETM +) sensors, are often integrated with field plots from forest inventory programs, leveraging the complete spatial coverage of imagery with detailed ecological information from a sample of plots to spatially model forest conditions and resources. However, in remote and unmanaged areas such as Canada's northern forests, financial and logistic constraints can severely limit the availability of inventory plot data. Additionally, Landsat spectral information has known limitations for characterizing vertical vegetation structure and biomass; while clouds, snow, and short growing seasons can limit development of large area image mosaics that are spectrally and phenologically consistent across space and time. In this study we predict and map forest structure and aboveground biomass over 37 million ha of forestland in Saskatchewan, Canada. We utilize lidar plots—observations of forest structure collected from airborne discrete-return lidar transects acquired in 2010—as a surrogate for traditional field and photo plots. Mapped explanatory data included Tasseled Cap indices and multi-temporal change metrics derived from Landsat TM/ETM + pixel-based image composites. Maps of forest structure and total aboveground biomass were created using a Random Forest (RF) implementation of Nearest Neighbor (NN) imputation. The imputation model had moderate to high plot-level accuracy across all forest attributes (R2 values of 0.42–0.69), as well as reasonable attribute predictions and error estimates (for example, canopy cover above 2 m on validation plots averaged 35.77%, with an RMSE of 13.45%, while unsystematic and systematic agreement coefficients (ACuns and ACsys) had values of 0.63 and 0.97 respectively). Additionally, forest attributes displayed consistent trends in relation to the time since and magnitude of wildfires, indicating model predictions captured the dominant ecological patterns and processes in these forests. Acknowledging methodological and conceptual challenges based upon the use of lidar plots from transects, this study demonstrates that using lidar plots and pixel compositing in imputation mapping can provide forest inventory and monitoring information for regions lacking ongoing or up-to-date field data collection programs
    corecore