1,632 research outputs found

    Constructive Relationships Between Algebraic Thickness and Normality

    Full text link
    We study the relationship between two measures of Boolean functions; \emph{algebraic thickness} and \emph{normality}. For a function ff, the algebraic thickness is a variant of the \emph{sparsity}, the number of nonzero coefficients in the unique GF(2) polynomial representing ff, and the normality is the largest dimension of an affine subspace on which ff is constant. We show that for 0<Ï”<20 < \epsilon<2, any function with algebraic thickness n3−ϔn^{3-\epsilon} is constant on some affine subspace of dimension Ω(nÏ”2)\Omega\left(n^{\frac{\epsilon}{2}}\right). Furthermore, we give an algorithm for finding such a subspace. We show that this is at most a factor of Θ(n)\Theta(\sqrt{n}) from the best guaranteed, and when restricted to the technique used, is at most a factor of Θ(log⁥n)\Theta(\sqrt{\log n}) from the best guaranteed. We also show that a concrete function, majority, has algebraic thickness Ω(2n1/6)\Omega\left(2^{n^{1/6}}\right).Comment: Final version published in FCT'201

    Integrable hierarchies and the mirror model of local CP1

    Full text link
    We study structural aspects of the Ablowitz-Ladik (AL) hierarchy in the light of its realization as a two-component reduction of the two-dimensional Toda hierarchy, and establish new results on its connection to the Gromov-Witten theory of local CP1. We first of all elaborate on the relation to the Toeplitz lattice and obtain a neat description of the Lax formulation of the AL system. We then study the dispersionless limit and rephrase it in terms of a conformal semisimple Frobenius manifold with non-constant unit, whose properties we thoroughly analyze. We build on this connection along two main strands. First of all, we exhibit a manifestly local bi-Hamiltonian structure of the Ablowitz-Ladik system in the zero-dispersion limit. Secondarily, we make precise the relation between this canonical Frobenius structure and the one that underlies the Gromov-Witten theory of the resolved conifold in the equivariantly Calabi-Yau case; a key role is played by Dubrovin's notion of "almost duality" of Frobenius manifolds. As a consequence, we obtain a derivation of genus zero mirror symmetry for local CP1 in terms of a dual logarithmic Landau-Ginzburg model.Comment: 27 pages, 1 figur

    Deformations of semisimple Poisson pencils of hydrodynamic type are unobstructed

    Full text link
    We prove that the bihamiltonian cohomology of a semisimple pencil of Poisson brackets of hydrodynamic type vanishes for almost all degrees. This implies the existence of a full dispersive deformation of a semisimple bihamiltonian structure of hydrodynamic type starting from any infinitesimal deformation.Comment: 22 pages. v2: corrected typos. v3: small improvements of the presentation. v4: typos, small improvements in the introduction and the presentatio

    Bihamiltonian cohomology of KdV brackets

    Get PDF
    Using spectral sequences techniques we compute the bihamiltonian cohomology groups of the pencil of Poisson brackets of dispersionless KdV hierarchy. In particular this proves a conjecture of Liu and Zhang about the vanishing of such cohomology groups.Comment: 16 pages. v2: corrected typos, in particular formulas (28), (78

    Reductions of the dispersionless 2D Toda hierarchy and their Hamiltonian structures

    Get PDF
    We study finite-dimensional reductions of the dispersionless 2D Toda hierarchy showing that the consistency conditions for such reductions are given by a system of radial Loewner equations. We then construct their Hamiltonian structures, following an approach proposed by Ferapontov.Comment: 15 page

    The bi-Hamiltonian cohomology of a scalar Poisson pencil

    Full text link
    We compute the bi-Hamiltonian cohomology of an arbitrary dispersionless Poisson pencil in a single dependent variable using a spectral sequence method. As in the KdV case, we obtain that BHdp(F^,d1,d2)BH^p_d(\hat{F}, d_1,d_2) is isomorphic to R\mathbb{R} for (p,d)=(0,0)(p,d)=(0,0), to C∞(R)C^\infty (\mathbb{R}) for (p,d)=(1,1)(p,d)=(1,1), (2,1)(2,1), (2,3)(2,3), (3,3)(3,3), and vanishes otherwise
    • 

    corecore