Aortoiliac reconstructive surgery based upon the results of duplex scanning

Objective:to evaluate whether duplex scanning can replace angiography in patients operated for aortoiliac obstructive disease.Design:retrospective.Materials and methods:between January 1995 and October 1996, 44 patients underwent vascular surgery of the aortoiliac tract. The study population was divided into two groups; patients operated upon the results of duplex scanning only and patients who also underwent angiography prior to surgery. The additional value of angiography and the differences between both groups concerning unexpected peroperative findings, early postoperative failures and the need for additional radiological or surgical interventions in the first three postoperative months were studied.Results:Duplex scan group: 22 patients were operated upon the results of duplex scanning only. In two patients surgical strategy had to be changed. Early postoperative graft occlusion occurred in one case. A haemodynamically significant graft stenosis within 3 months of surgery occurred in one patient. Duplex/angiography group: 22 patients underwent both duplex scanning and angiography. Six patients underwent diagnostic angiography after failed duplex scanning. In 10 patients angiography was part of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty prior to surgery. In six patients angiograms were performed after successful duplex scanning. Angiography failed in two patients and added information in four of 16 patients. Unexpected findings at operation occurred in four patients. Graft stenosis within 3 months was detected in three patients.Conclusion:after successful duplex scanning information obtained by angiography has only a limited impact on therapeutic decision-making. In the majority of patients vascular reconstructive surgery of aortoiliac arteries can be planned based on duplex scanning only

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial

Development and application of statistical models for medical scientific researc

Updated protocol of the SANO trial: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial comparing surgery with active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer

Background: The Surgery As Needed for Oesophageal cancer (SANO) trial compares active surveillance with standard oesophagectomy for patients with a clinically complete response (cCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The last patient with a clinically complete response is expected to be included in May 2021. The purpose of this update is to present all amendments to the SANO trial protocol as approved by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) before accrual is completed.Design: The SANO trial protocol has been published (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4034-1). In this ongoing, phase-III, non-inferiority, stepped-wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial, patients with cCR (i.e. after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy no evidence of residual disease in two consecutive clinical response evaluations [CREs]) undergo either active surveillance or standard oesophagectomy. In the active surveillance arm, CREs are repeated every 3 months in the first year, every 4 months in the second year, every 6months in the third year, and yearly in the fourth and fifth year. In this arm, oesophagectomy is offered only to patients in whom locoregional regrowth is highly suspected or proven, without distant metastases. The primary endpoint is overall survival.Update: Amendments to the study design involve the first cluster in the stepped-wedge design being partially randomised as well and continued accrual of patients at baseline until the predetermined number of patients with cCR is reached. Eligibility criteria have been amended, stating that patients who underwent endoscopic treatment prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy cannot be included and that patients who have highly suspected residual tumour without histological proof can be included. Amendments to the study procedures include that patients proceed to the second CRE if at the first CRE the outcome of the pathological assessment is uncertain and that patients with a non-passable stenosis at endoscopy are not considered cCR. The sample size was recalculated following new insights on response rates (34% instead of 50%) and survival (expected 2-year overall survival of 75% calculated from the moment of reaching cCR instead of 3-year overall survival of 67% calculated from diagnosis). This reduced the number of required patients with cCR from 264 to 224, but increased the required inclusions from 480 to approximately 740 patients at baseline.Conclusion: Substantial amendments were made prior to closure of enrolment of the SANO trial. These amendments do not affect the outcomes of the trial compared to the original protocol. The first results are expected late 2023. If active surveillance plus surgery as needed after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer leads to non-inferior overall survival compared to standard oesophagectomy, active surveillance can be implemented as a standard of care.Development and application of statistical models for medical scientific researc

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) plus surgery is a standard treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. With this treatment, 29% of patients have a pathologically complete response in the resection specimen. This provides the rationale for investigating an active surveillance approach. The aim of this study is to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of active surveillance vs. standard oesophagectomy after nCRT for oesophageal cancer. Methods: This is a phase-III multi-centre, stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. A total of 300 patients with clinically complete response (cCR, i.e. no local or disseminated disease proven by histology) after nCRT will be randomised to show non-inferiority of active surveillance to standard oesophagectomy (non-inferiority margin 15%, intra-correlation coefficient 0.02, power 80%, 2-sided α 0.05, 12% drop-out). Patients will undergo a first clinical response evaluation (CRE-I) 4-6 weeks after nCRT, consisting of endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies of the primary tumour site and other suspected lesions. Clinically complete responders will undergo a second CRE (CRE-II), 6-8 weeks after CRE-I. CRE-II will include 18F-FDG-PET-CT, followed by endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies and ultra-endosonography plus fine needle aspiration of suspected lymph nodes and/or PET- positive lesions. Patients with cCR at CRE-II will be assigned to oesophagectomy (first phase) or active surveillance (second phase of the study). The duration of the first phase is determined randomly over the 12 centres, i.e., stepped-wedge cluster design. Patients in the active surveillance arm will undergo diagnostic evaluations similar to CRE-II at 6/9/12/16/20/24/30/36/48 and 60 months after nCRT. In this arm, oesophagectomy will be offered only to patients in whom locoregional regrowth is highly suspected or proven, without distant dissemination. The main study parameter is overall survival; secondary endpoints include percentage of patients who do not undergo surgery, quality of life, clinical irresectability (cT4b) rate, radical resection rate, postoperative complications, progression-free survival, distant dissemination rate, and cost-effectiveness. We hypothesise that active surveillance leads to non-inferior survival, improved quality of life and a reduction in costs, compared to standard oesophagectomy. Discussion: If active surveillance and surgery as needed after nCRT leads to non-inferior survival compared to standard oesophagectomy, this organ-sparing approach can be implemented as a standard of care

Colonoscopic-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resection for Colonic Lesions A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study (LIMERIC-Study)

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified CAL-WR. Summary Background Data: The use of segmental colectomy in patients with endoscopically unresectable colonic lesions results in significant morbidity and mortality. CAL-WR is an alternative procedure that may reduce morbidity. Methods: This prospective multicenter study was performed in 13 Dutch hospitals between January 2017 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were (1) colonic lesions inaccessible using current endoscopic resection techniques (judged by an expert panel), (2) non-lifting residual/recurrent adenomatous tissue after previous polypectomy or (3) an undetermined resection margin after endoscopic removal of a low-risk pathological T1 (pT1) colon carcinoma. Thirty-day morbidity, technical success rate and radicality were evaluated. Results: Of the 118 patients included (56% male, mean age 66 years, standard deviation +/- 8 years), 66 (56%) had complex lesions unsuitable for endoscopic removal, 34 (29%) had non-lifting residual/recurrent adenoma after previous polypectomy and 18 (15%) had uncertain resection margins after polypectomy of a pT1 colon carcinoma. CAL-WR was technically successful in 93% and R-0 resection was achieved in 91% of patients. Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo i-ii) were noted in 7 patients (6%) and an additional oncologic segmental resection was performed in 12 cases (11%). Residual tissue at the scar was observed in 5% of patients during endoscopic follow-up. Conclusions: CAL-WR is an effective, organ-preserving approach that results in minor complications and circumvents the need for major surgery. CAL-WR, therefore, deserves consideration when endoscopic excision of circumscribed lesions is impossible or incomplete.Cellular mechanisms in basic and clinical gastroenterology and hepatolog

Evaluation of national surgical practice for lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer in an untrained setting

Background. Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level.Methods. Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either 'node-picking' (the removal of an individual LLN) or 'partial regional node dissection' (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (=7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those undergoing only rectal resection.Results. Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking (n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND (n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery (n = 48) or rectal resection alone (n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2-2.5, p = 0.874).Conclusion. Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research

Surgery for colorectal cancer: improving staging by the sentinel lymph node procedure

Bij de behandeling van borstkanker is het de standaardpraktijk: checken of de ‘schildwachtklier’ die bij de tumor hoort, vrij is van kwaadaardige cellen. Edwin van der Zaag pleit ervoor dezelfde procedure te volgen bij darmkanker. Chirurgen doen er volgens hem goed aan bij het wegnemen van een stuk darm met tumoren te checken welke lymfeklier de zogenoemde ‘schildwachtklier’ is die bij de tumor hoort. Daarna is het aan de patholoog om te beoordelen of deze vrij is van tumorcellen. Als eventuele vervolgbehandelingen worden afgestemd op de bevindingen in de schildwachtklier is veel winst te behalen, denkt Van der Zaag. Van de patiënten die worden geopereerd aan kanker in de dikke darm of de endeldarm, en die volgens de huidige procedure schone lymfeklieren hebben, krijgt ongeveer dertig procent toch weer kanker. Kijk je via de schildwachtprocedure, dan blijkt dertig procent van degenen met veronderstelde schone klieren toch tumorcellen in de schildwachtklier te hebben

Angioplasty or Bypass for Superficial Femoral Artery Disease? A Randomised Controlled Trial

AbstractAim. To evaluate whether angioplasty or above-knee bypass is the best treatment for symptomatic superficial femoral artery occlusive lesions, we performed a multicentre randomised trial.Patients and methods. Between October 1995 and August 1998, 56 patients were enrolled, all with symptoms related to a 5–15 cm long occlusive lesion of the superficial femoral artery. Thirty-one patients were randomly assigned to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); 25 patients to bypass surgery. All patients were followed at 1, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The primary outcome of our study was re-occlusion of the femoral artery.Results. Thirty patients underwent the allocated PTA and 24 patients underwent bypass surgery. Cumulative 1-year primary patency after PTA was 43 and 82% after bypass surgery. After PTA more than half of the patients had a re-occlusion with an absolute risk reduction of 31% (CI: 6–56%) in favour of bypass surgery. The hazard ratio for occlusion comparing PTA with bypass surgery is 2.24 (95% CI: 0.9–5.58).Conclusion. Despite 18 participating centres only 56 patients were randomised to PTA our bypass surgery. Based on our results, for every three patients treated with bypass surgery instead of PTA, one additional re-occlusion is prevented. Therefore, we conclude that with respect to patency, for long superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenoses or occlusions, surgery is better than PTA