144 research outputs found
Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers
Abstract Background: The sustainability of long-term care (LTC) is a prominent policy priority in many Western countries. LTC is one of the most pressing fiscal issues for the growing population of elderly people in the European Union (EU) Member States. Country recommendations regarding LTC are prominent under the EU's European Semester. Methods: This paper examines challenges related to the financial-and organizational sustainability of LTC systems in the EU. We combined a targeted literature review and a descriptive selected country analysis of: (1) public-and private funding; (2) informal care and externalities; and (3) the possible role of technology in increasing productivity. Countries were selected via purposive sampling to establish a cohort of country cases covering the spectrum of differences in LTC systems: public spending, private funding, informal care use, informal care support, and cash benefits. Results: The aging of the population, the increasing gap between availability of informal care and demand for LTC, substantial market failures of private funding for LTC, and fiscal imbalances in some countries, have led to structural reforms and enduring pressures for LTC policy-makers across the EU. Our exploration of national policies illustrates different solutions that attempt to promote fairness while stimulating efficient delivery of services. Important steps must be taken to address the sustainability of LTC. First, countries should look deeper into the possibilities of complementing public-and private funding, as well as at addressing market failures of private funding. Second, informal care externalities with spill-over into neighboring policy areas, the labor force, and formal LTC workers, should be properly addressed. Thirdly, innovations in LTC services should be stimulated to increase productivity through technology and process innovations, and to reduce costs. Conclusion: The analysis shows why it is difficult for EU Member State governments to meet all their goals for sustainable LTC, given the demographic-and fiscal circumstances, and the complexities of LTC systems. It also shows the usefulness to learn from policy design and implementation of LTC policy in other countries, within and outside the EU. Researchers can contribute by studying conditions, under which the strategies explored might deliver solutions for policy-makers
Comparing the implementation of team approaches for improving diabetes care in community health centers
Background: Patient panel management and community-based care management may be viable strategies for community health centers to improve the quality of diabetes care for vulnerable patient populations. The objective of our study was to clarify implementation processes and experiences of integrating office-based medical assistant (MA) panel management and community health worker (CHW) community-based management into routine care for diabetic patients. Methods: Mixed methods study with interviews and surveys of clinicians and staff participating in a study comparing the effectiveness of MA and CHW health coaching for improving diabetes care. Participants included 24 key informants in five role categories and 249 clinicians and staff survey respondents from 14 participating practices. We conducted thematic analyses of key informant interview transcripts to clarify implementation processes and describe barriers to integrating the new roles into practice. We surveyed clinicians and staff to assess differences in practice culture among intervention and control groups. We triangulated findings to identify concordant and disparate results across data sources. Results: Implementation processes and experiences varied considerably among the practices implementing CHW and MA team-based approaches, resulting in differences in the organization of health coaching and self-management support activities. Importantly, CHW and MA responsibilities converged over time to focus on health coaching of diabetic patients. MA health coaches experienced difficulty in allocating dedicated time due to other MA responsibilities that often crowded out time for diabetic patient health coaching. Time constraints also limited the personal introduction of patients to health coaches by clinicians. Participants highlighted the importance of a supportive team climate and proactive leadership as important enablers for MAs and CHWs to implement their health coaching responsibilities and also promoted professional growth. Conclusion: Implementation of team-based strategies to improve diabetes care for vulnerable populations was diverse, however all practices converged in their foci on health coaching roles of CHWs and MAs. Our study suggests that a flexible approach to implementing health coaching is more important than fidelity to rigid models that do not allow for variable allocation of responsibilities across team members. Clinicians play an instrumental role in supporting health coaches to grow into their new patient care responsibilities
Impact and feasibility of a tailor-made patient communication quality improvement programme for hospital-based physiotherapists:a mixed-methods study
Background In tailoring a quality improvement programme for hospital-based physiotherapy, the original use of video recordings was replaced by using the tracer methodology. Objective To examine the impact of a tailor-made quality improvement programme addressing patient communication on the professional development of hospital-based physiotherapists, and to evaluate barriers and facilitators as determinants of feasibility of the programme. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted. Participants were clustered in groups per hospital and linked with an equally sized group in a nearby hospital. Within the groups, fixed couples carried out a 2-hour tracer by directly observing each other's daily work routine. This procedure was repeated 6 months later. Data from feedback forms were analysed quantitatively, and a thematic analysis of transcripts from group interviews was conducted. Results Fifty hospital-based physiotherapists from 16 hospitals participated. They rated the impact of the programme on professional development, on a scale from 1 (much improvement needed) to 5 (no improvement needed), as 3.99 (SD 0.64) after the first tracer and 4.32 (SD 0.63) 6 months later; a mean improvement of 0.33 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.50). Participants scored, on a scale ranging from 1 to 5 on barriers and facilitators (feasibility), a mean of 3.45 (SD 0.95) on determinants of innovation, 3.47 (SD 0.86) on probability to use and 2.63 (SD 1.07) on the user feedback list. All participants emphasised the added value of the tracer methodology and mentioned effects on self-reflection and awareness most. Conclusions The tailor-made quality improvement programme, based on principles of the tracer methodology, was associated with a significant impact on professional development. Barriers and facilitators as determinants of feasibility of the programme showed the programme being feasible
Quality aspects of hospital-based physiotherapy from the perspective of key stakeholders:a qualitative study
Background For the design of a robust quality system for hospital-based physiotherapy, it is important to know what key stakeholders consider quality to be. Objective To explore key stakeholders' views on quality of hospital-based physiotherapy. Methods We conducted 53 semi-structured interviews with 62 representatives of five key stakeholder groups of hospital-based physiotherapy: medical specialists, hospital managers, boards of directors, multidisciplinary colleagues and patients. Audio recordings of these interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed with thematic analysis. Results According to the interviewees, quality of hospital-based physiotherapy is characterised by: (1) a human approach, (2) context-specific and up-to-date applicable knowledge and expertise, (3) providing the right care in the right place at the right time, (4) a proactive departmental policy in which added value for the hospital is transparent, (5) professional development and innovation based on a vision on science and developments in healthcare, (6) easy access and awareness of one's own and others' position within the interdisciplinary cooperation and (7) ensuring a continuum of care with the inclusion of preclinical and postclinical care of patients. Conclusions Important quality aspects in the perspective of all stakeholders were an expertise that matches the specific pathology of the patient, the hospital-based physiotherapist being a part of the care team, and the support and supervision of all patients concerning physical functioning during the hospitalisation period. Whereas patients mainly mentioned the personal qualities of the physiotherapist, the other stakeholders mainly focused on professional and organisational factors. The results of this study offer opportunities for hospital-based physiotherapy to improve the quality of provided care seen from the perspective of key stakeholders
The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice:a scoping review
INTRODUCTION: The tracer method, commonly used for quality assessment, can also be used as a tool for peer observation and formative feedback on professional development. This scoping review describes how, by whom, and with what effect the tracer method is applied as a formative professional development instrument between healthcare professionals of equal status and aims to identify the types of scientific evidence for this use of the tracer method. METHODS: The authors searched four electronic databases for eligible articles, which were screened and assessed for eligibility by two independent researchers. From eligible studies, data were extracted to summarize, collate, and make a narrative account of the findings. RESULTS: The electronic search yielded 1757 unique studies, eight of which were included as valid and relevant to our aim: five qualitative, two mixed methods, and one quantitative study. Seven studies took place in hospitals and one in general practice. The tracer method was used mainly as a form of peer observation and formative feedback. Most studies evaluated the tracer method’s feasibility and its impact on professional development. All but one study reported positive effects: participants described the tracer method generally as being valuable and worth continuing. DISCUSSION: Although the body of evidence is small and largely limited to the hospital setting, using the tracer method for peer observation and formative feedback between healthcare professionals of equal status appears sufficiently useful to merit further rigorous evaluation and implementation in continuous professional development in healthcare. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00693-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users
Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Clinical guidelines are considered important instruments to improve quality in health care. Since 1998 the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF) produced evidence-based clinical guidelines, based on a standardized program. New developments in the field of guideline research raised the need to evaluate and update the KNGF guideline program.</p> <p>Purpose of this study is to compare different guideline development programs and review the KNGF guideline program for physical therapy in the Netherlands, in order to update the program.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>Six international guideline development programs were selected, and the 23 criteria of the AGREE Instrument were used to evaluate the guideline programs. Information about the programs was retrieved from published handbooks of the organizations. Also, the Dutch program for guideline development in physical therapy was evaluated using the AGREE criteria. Further comparison the six guideline programs was carried out using the following elements of the guideline development processes: Structure and organization; Preparation and initiation; Development; Validation; Dissemination and implementation; Evaluation and update.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Compliance with the AGREE criteria of the guideline programs was high. Four programs addressed 22 AGREE criteria, and two programs addressed 20 AGREE criteria. The previous Dutch program for guideline development in physical therapy lacked in compliance with the AGREE criteria, meeting only 13 criteria.</p> <p>Further comparison showed that all guideline programs perform systematic literature searches to identify the available evidence. Recommendations are formulated and graded, based on evidence and other relevant factors. It is not clear how decisions in the development process are made. In particular, the process of translating evidence into practice recommendations can be improved.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>As a result of international developments and consensus, the described processes for developing clinical practice guidelines have much in common. The AGREE criteria are common basis for the development of guidelines, although it is not clear how final decisions are made. Detailed comparison of the different guideline programs was used for updating the Dutch program. As a result the updated KNGF program complied with 22 AGREE criteria. International discussion is continuing and will be used for further improvement of the program.</p
Patterns of healthcare resource utilization in patients with sarcoidosis: A cross-sectional study
Background: Limited data are available on healthcare resource use and costs in patients with sarcoidosis; Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to describe cost-drivers of the top 1% and top ≥1-5% high-cost patients with sarcoidosis. The secondary aim was to compare costs of patients with and without fatigue complaints and to compare comorbidities. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cross-sectional study in 200 patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis. Hospital administrative databases were used to extract healthcare utilization on the individual patient level. Healthcare costs were categorized into nine groups. Results: Average total health care costs for the top 1% (n=22), top ≥1%-5% (n=88) and bottom 95% beneficiaries (n=90) were € 108.296, €53.237 and €4.817, respectively. Mean treatment time in days for the top 1%, top ≥1-5% and the random sample of the bottom 95% was 1688 days (±225), 1412 days (±367) and 775 days (±659), respectively. Mean annual costs for the top 1%, top ≥1-5% and the random sample of the bottom 95% are €51.082, €27.840 and €8.692, respectively. We identified three cost-drivers in the top 5% high-cost patients: 1) expensive medication, 2) intensive care and 3) costs made at the respiratory unit. Patients with and without fatigue showed to have comparable mean costs. High-cost patients were more likely to have multiple organs involved due to sarcoidosis. Conclusions: We identified expensive medication as the main cost-driver in the top 5% high-cost patients with sarcoidosis. The study findings can help to tailor interventions for improving the quality of care and reducing overall costs
The Relationship Between the Scope of Essential Health Benefits and Statutory Financing: An International Comparison Across Eight European Countries
Background: Both rising healthcare costs and the global financial crisis have fueled a search for
policy tools in order to avoid unsustainable future financing of essential health benefits. The scope of
essential health benefits (the range of services covered) and depth of coverage (the proportion of costs
of the covered benefits that is covered publicly) are corresponding variables in determining the benefits
package. We hypothesized that a more comprehensive health benefit package may increase user costsharing
charges.
Methods: We conducted a desktop research study to assess the interrelationship between the scope
of covered health benefits and the height of statutory spending in a sample of 8 European countries:
Belgium, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Scotland, Sweden, and Switzerland. We conducted
a targeted literature search to identify characteristics of the healthcare systems in our sample of countries.
We analyzed similarities and differences based on the dimensions of publicly financed healthcare as
published by the European Observatory on Health Care Systems.
Results: We found that the scope of services is comparable and comprehensive across our sample, with
only marginal differences. Cost-sharing arrangements show the most variation. In general, we found
no direct interrelationship in this sample between the ranges of services covered in the health benefits
package and the height of public spending on healthcare. With regard to specific services (dental care,
physical therapy), we found indications of an association between coverage of services and cost-sharing
arrangements. Strong variations in the volume and price of healthcare services between the 8 countries
were found for services with large practice variations.
Conclusion: Although reducing the scope of the benefit package as well as increasing user charges may
contribute to the financial sustainability of healthcare, variations in the volume and price of care seem
to have a much larger impact on financial sustainability. Policy-makers should focus on a variety of
measures within an integrated approach. There is no silver bullet for addressing the sustainability of
healthcare
Predicting readiness for return to sport and performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation
Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers
Background: The sustainability of long-term care (LTC) is a prominent policy priority in many Western
countries. LTC is one of the most pressing fiscal issues for the growing population of elderly people in the
European Union (EU) Member States. Country recommendations regarding LTC are prominent under the
EU’s European Semester.
Methods: This paper examines challenges related to the financial- and organizational sustainability of LTC
systems in the EU. We combined a targeted literature review and a descriptive selected country analysis of:
(1) public- and private funding; (2) informal care and externalities; and (3) the possible role of technology in
increasing productivity. Countries were selected via purposive sampling to establish a cohort of country cases
covering the spectrum of differences in LTC systems: public spending, private funding, informal care use,
informal care support, and cash benefits.
Results: The aging of the population, the increasing gap between availability of informal care and demand for
LTC, substantial market failures of private funding for LTC, and fiscal imbalances in some countries, have led
to structural reforms and enduring pressures for LTC policy-makers across the EU. Our exploration of national
policies illustrates different solutions that attempt to promote fairness while stimulating efficient delivery of
services. Important steps must be taken to address the sustainability of LTC. First, countries should look deeper
into the possibilities of complementing public- and private funding, as well as at addressing market failures of
private funding. Second, informal care externalities with spill-over into neighboring policy areas, the labor
force, and formal LTC workers, should be properly addressed. Thirdly, innovations in LTC services should be
stimulated to increase productivity through technology and process innovations, and to reduce costs.
Conclusion: The analysis shows why it is difficult for EU Member State governments to meet all their goals for
sustainable LTC, given the demographic- and fiscal circumstances, and the complexities of LTC systems. It also
shows the usefulness to learn from policy design and implementation of LTC policy in other countries, within
and outside the EU. Researchers can contribute by studying conditions, under which the strategies explored
might deliver solutions for policy-maker
- …