OC-0052: Late toxicity in the randomized phase III Dutch Hypofractionation Trial for prostate cancer patients (HYPRO)

n/

Pain characteristics help to predict the analgesic efficacy of radiotherapy for the treatment of cancer pain

Contains fulltext : 24616___.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Hypofractionated Versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Five-Year Oncologic Outcomes of the Dutch Randomized Phase 3 HYPRO Trial

Biological, physical and clinical aspects of cancer treatment with ionising radiatio

Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial

Biological, physical and clinical aspects of cancer treatment with ionising radiatio

Quality of life among patients with 4 to 10 brain metastases after treatment with whole-brain radiotherapy vs. stereotactic radiotherapy: a phase III, randomized, Dutch multicenter trial

Background: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an attractive treatment option for patients with brain metastases (BM), sparing healthy brain tissue and likely controlling local tumors. Most previous studies have focused on radiological response or survival. Our randomized trial (NCT02353000) investigated whether quality of life (QoL) is better preserved using SRT than whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for patients with multiple BM. Recently, we published our trial’s primary endpoints. The current report discusses the study’s secondary endpoints. Methods: Patients with 4 to 10 BM were randomly assigned to a standard-arm WBRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions) or SRT group (1 fraction of 15–24 Gy or 3 fractions of 8 Gy). QoL endpoints—such as EQ5D domains post-treatment, the Barthel index, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires, and the neurocognitive Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—were evaluated. Results: Due to poor accrual resulting from patients’ and referrers’ preference for SRT, this study closed prematurely. The other endpoints’ results were published recently. Twenty patients were available for analysis (n=10 vs. n=10 for the two groups, respectively). Significant differences were observed 3 months post-treatment for the mobility (P=0.041), self-care (P=0.028), and alopecia (P=0.014) EQ5D domains, favoring SRT. This self-care score also persisted compared to the baseline (P=0.025). Multiple EORTC categories reflected significant differences, favoring SRT—particularly physical functioning and social functioning. Conclusions: For patients with multiple BM, SRT alone led to persistently higher QoL than treatment with WBRT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02353000