Efficient cationic ring-opening polymerization of diverse cyclic imino ethers: unexpected copolymerization behavior

The recently developed fast microwave-assisted cationic ring-opening polymerization procedure for 2-oxazolines seems to be ideally suited for slower polymerizing cyclic imino ether monomers. In this study we report the effect of the cyclic imino ether structure on the polymerization rate under exactly the same microwave-assisted conditions revealing that indeed less reactive cyclic imino ethers, including 2-oxazines as well as 4- and 5-substituted 2-oxazolines, can be polymerized to at least 50% conversion for the slowest monomer, namely 5-methyl-2-butyl-2-oxazoline, within 10 h. In addition, the copolymerization behavior of 4-ethyl-2-butyl-2-oxazoline with 2-methyl-2-oxazoline and 2-phenyl-2-oxazoline unexpectedly revealed faster incorporation of the less reactive 4-ethy1-2-buty1-2-oxazoline monomer compared to 2-phenyl-2-oxazoline due to the increased bulk of the latter monomer amplifying the sterical hindrance for polymerization onto the 4-ethyl-2-butyl-2-oxazolinium propagating species

The differential effects of ecstasy/polydrug use on executive components: shifting, inhibition, updating and access to semantic memory

Rationale/Objectives Recent theoretical models suggest that the central executive may not be a unified structure. The present study explored the nature of central executive deficits in ecstasy users. Methods In study 1, 27 ecstasy users and 34 non-users were assessed using tasks to tap memory updating (computation span; letter updating) and access to long-term memory (a semantic fluency test and the Chicago Word Fluency Test). In study 2, 51 ecstasy users and 42 non-users completed tasks that assess mental set switching (number/letter and plus/minus) and inhibition (random letter generation). Results MANOVA revealed that ecstasy users performed worse on both tasks used to assess memory updating and on tasks to assess access to long-term memory (C- and S-letter fluency). However, notwithstanding the significant ecstasy group-related effects, indices of cocaine and cannabis use were also significantly correlated with most of the executive measures. Unexpectedly, in study 2, ecstasy users performed significantly better on the inhibition task, producing more letters than non-users. No group differences were observed on the switching tasks. Correlations between indices of ecstasy use and number of letters produced were significant. Conclusions The present study provides further support for ecstasy/polydrug-related deficits in memory updating and in access to long-term memory. The surplus evident on the inhibition task should be treated with some caution, as this was limited to a single measure and has not been supported by our previous work