No Excess Mortality in Patients Aged 50 Years and Older Who Received Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Background. The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased at a fast rate.The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and treatment in the Netherlands and estimate the excess mortality risk of DCIS. Methods. From the Netherlands Cancer Registry, adult female patients (diagnosed 1997–2005) with DCIS were selected. Treatment was described according to age. Relative mortality at 10 years of follow-up was calculated by dividing observed mortality over expected mortality. Expected mortality was calculated using the matched Dutch general population. Results. Overall, 8421 patients were included in this study. For patients aged 50–64, and 65–74 an increase in breast-conserving surgery was observed over time (P < 0.001). For patients over 75 years of age, 8.0% did not undergo surgery; this percentage remained stable over time (P = 0.07). Overall, treated patients aged >50 years experienced no excess mortality regardless of treatment (relative mortality 1.0). Conclusion. The present population-based study of almost 8500 patients showed no excess mortality in surgically treated women over 50 years with DCIS

Older patients with breast cancer: is there bias in the treatment they receive?

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignant tumor in women worldwide and as breast cancer incidence increases with increasing age, over 40% of new cases are diagnosed in women older than 65 years of age. However, older patients are not treated to the same extent as younger patients and increasing age at diagnosis predicts deviation from guidelines for all treatment modalities. Evidence-based medicine in older patients is lacking as they are usually excluded from clinical trials often because of existing comorbidities and limited life expectancy. Accordingly, there is a higher competing risk of death from other causes than breast cancer compared with younger patients and this may have led to the false interpretation that prognosis of breast cancer in older patients is relatively good. However, every treatment modality should be evaluated during treatment decision making. Multimodal therapy should not be routinely withheld as data show that disease-specific mortality increases with age, probably due to undertreatment. Prognostic markers, fitness and comorbidities rather than chronological age should determine optimal, individualized therapy. It is recommended that treatment decisions should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, ideally in combination with any form of geriatric assessment, to improve breast cancer outcome in the older population

Clinical Study No Excess Mortality in Patients Aged 50 Years and Older Who Received Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Background. The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased at a fast rate.The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and treatment in the Netherlands and estimate the excess mortality risk of DCIS. Methods. From the Netherlands Cancer Registry, adult female patients (diagnosed 1997-2005) with DCIS were selected. Treatment was described according to age. Relative mortality at 10 years of follow-up was calculated by dividing observed mortality over expected mortality. Expected mortality was calculated using the matched Dutch general population. Results. Overall, 8421 patients were included in this study. For patients aged 50-64, and 65-74 an increase in breast-conserving surgery was observed over time (P &lt; 0.001). For patients over 75 years of age, 8.0% did not undergo surgery; this percentage remained stable over time (P = 0.07). Overall, treated patients aged &gt;50 years experienced no excess mortality regardless of treatment (relative mortality 1.0). Conclusion. The present population-based study of almost 8500 patients showed no excess mortality in surgically treated women over 50 years with DCIS

External Validity of a Trial Comprised of Elderly Patients With Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

Background Inclusion in trials is selective, and thus results may not be generalizable to the general population. The aim of this study was to investigate the external validity of randomized clinical trial outcomes for elderly breast cancer patients. Methods We compared characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer patients (n = 1325) who participated in a randomized clinical trial (Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational trial) with unselected breast cancer patients of corresponding age from the general population (n = 1056). Dutch patients aged 65 years or older at diagnosis of hormone receptor–positive breast cancer without distant metastases, with either nodal involvement, a tumor greater than 3cm, or a 1 to 3cm histological grade III tumor, who completed local therapy were included. Analyses were stratified by age (65–74 years; ≥75 years). Primary outcome was overall mortality. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between covariables and overall mortality. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Irrespective of age, patients who participated in the trial had fewer comorbid diseases, a higher socioeconomic status, and smaller tumors (all P < .001). In patients aged 65 to 74 years, those who participated in the trial had a similar overall mortality to patients from the general population (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73 to 1.60). Alternatively, in patients aged 75 years or older, those who participated in the trial had a lower overall mortality (multivariable HR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.95; P = .02) than patients in the general population. Conclusions Breast cancer trial participants aged 75 years or older do not represent elderly breast cancer patients of corresponding age from the general population, which hampers the external validity of a trial

Early stage breast cancer treatment and outcome of older patients treated in an oncogeriatric care and a standard care setting: an international comparison

Introduction: Since older patients with breast cancer are underrepresented in clinical trials, an oncogeriatric approach is advocated to guide treatment decisions. However, the effect on outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare treatments and outcomes between patients treated in an oncogeriatric and a standard care setting. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 70 years with early stage breast cancer were included. The oncogeriatric cohort comprised unselected patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center, and the standard cohort patients from a Dutch population-based cohort. Cox models were used to characterize the influence of care setting on recurrence risk and overall mortality. Results: Overall, 268 patients were included in the oncogeriatric and 1932 patients in the standard cohort. Patients in the oncogeriatric cohort were slightly younger, had more comorbidity, and received more adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Oncogeriatric care was associated with a lower risk of recurrence, which remained significant after adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–0.99]. Oncogeriatric care was also associated with a lower overall mortality, which also remained significant after adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.87). Conclusions: Patients treated in the oncogeriatric care setting had a lower risk of recurrence, which may be explained by more systemic treatment. Overall mortality was also lower, but other explanations besides care setting could not be ruled out as the cohorts had different patient profiles. Future studies need to clarify the impact of an oncogeriatric approach on outcomes

Omission of surgery in elderly patients with early stage breast cancer

To assess national trends over time in surgery for elderly patients with resectable breast cancer (BC) and to evaluate clinical outcome and cause of death after the omission of surgery in a regional cohort of elderly patients. National trends in 1995-2005 were calculated using cancer registry data. In addition, a chart review was performed in a cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years, with early stage BC but no primary surgery, diagnosed at five Dutch hospitals in 1990-2005. Patient characteristics, comorbidity and reason for the omission of surgery were collected from the chart. Cause of death was retrieved from death certificate data registered at Statistics Netherlands. Omission of surgery increased significantly over time for patients aged 80 years and older (p <0.05). Of the 187 patients in the regional cohort (median age 85.9 years (range 75.0-97.7), 174 (92%) received hormonal therapy. Omission of surgery was at the patient's request in 59 patients (32%). Of the 178 patients that died during follow-up, 60 patients (34%) died of BC. For 81 patients (45%), BC was not clinically relevant at the time of death. Median overall survival was 2.3 years (range 0.2-10.7) and did not differ between BC and other causes of death (p=0.9). Omission of surgery for elderly patients with resectable BC has increased significantly over the past decade; instead patients often received primary endocrine treatment. Although this may appear an effective alternative to surgery, the potential for a longer term negative impact on disease control and quality of life deserves further investigatio